PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
Moderators: niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, Morris_Shatford, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, DG88
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
-
kalel123
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,423
- And1: 4,794
- Joined: Oct 19, 2004
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
Wemby up next. We are f'ed.
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
- LoveMyRaps
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,837
- And1: 50,305
- Joined: Jun 10, 2013
-
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
I like how RJ has reduced his touches and taken a backseat to Ingram and Barnes.
He’s thinking pass first on offense and trying his best on defense.
Hence why he’s been so effective.
Need IQ to do the same. Less dribbling and more coming off screens trying to get open for a catch and shoot 3.
He’s thinking pass first on offense and trying his best on defense.
Hence why he’s been so effective.
Need IQ to do the same. Less dribbling and more coming off screens trying to get open for a catch and shoot 3.
In Masai We Trust 


Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
-
nikster
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,581
- And1: 13,052
- Joined: Sep 08, 2013
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
kalel123 wrote:Wemby up next. We are f'ed.
Giannis, AD and Wemby is a pretty brutal stetch for us, especially with Poeltl working his way back and CMB missing games and getting up to speed
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
- MEDIC
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,640
- And1: 11,377
- Joined: Jul 25, 2006
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
Boselecta wrote:Darko and even Nick Nurses scrambling around blitzing defenses are driving me crazy. These defenses only work on the college level or if you have very elite personal like we did our championship year otherwise this defense gets cooked every time.
See........I love it......but you have to have the dawgs to do it. I found the Davion/ Jamal duo highly entertaining. Super competitive basketball. The level of effort & the competitive fire looked so much better.

* Props to the man, the myth, the legend......TZ.
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
-
kalel123
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,423
- And1: 4,794
- Joined: Oct 19, 2004
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
MEDIC wrote:Boselecta wrote:Darko and even Nick Nurses scrambling around blitzing defenses are driving me crazy. These defenses only work on the college level or if you have very elite personal like we did our championship year otherwise this defense gets cooked every time.
See........I love it......but you have to have the dawgs to do it. I found the Davion/ Jamal duo highly entertaining. Super competitive basketball. The level of effort & the competitive fire looked so much better.
Kinda difficult to replicate when you got Quickley, RJ, and Ingram as your 1, 2, 3 especially with Poeltl playing like dog ****.
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
- MEDIC
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,640
- And1: 11,377
- Joined: Jul 25, 2006
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
Shakril wrote:MEDIC wrote:HiJiNX wrote:I agree that I liked us when we had Davion and Shead. It was 48 minutes of tough defence that other teams struggled with.
Here's an honest question:
What would you rather have:
Davion Mitchell - 12 million
Immanuel Quickley - 32.5 million
Depends on the goal. If i want to be competitive, IQ. Otherwise Mitchell.
I don't think the needle moves much. One is 1/3 of the price & is way better at defense. One if 3x the price & is better at shooting 3's.
Neither is an elite floor general. Davion probably has the better 1st step, but neither is a great finished around the rim.

* Props to the man, the myth, the legend......TZ.
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
- LoveMyRaps
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,837
- And1: 50,305
- Joined: Jun 10, 2013
-
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
shmoosicle wrote:LoveMyRaps wrote:Look at the nasty stuff being tweeted at our players…
Too many immature imbeciles in our fanbase
?s=46&t=PSy3Ch7pvG4ybe2MpvWFcw
What the hell is this, that's an insane thing to tweet.
Nasty stuff man. There's a lot more as well. Bunch of kids that hopped on the 2019 title run bandwagon and have no sense of right or wrong.
In Masai We Trust 


Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
- HiJiNX
- Forum Mod - Raptors

- Posts: 16,527
- And1: 15,813
- Joined: Mar 19, 2004
- Location: T-Dot
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
sbsat wrote:HiJiNX wrote:sbsat wrote:
Agreed and also the development coach argument is a non starter. The raptors are a luxury tax team they need to move now
No coach is going to get RJ, Ingram, IQ, and an out of shape Poeltl to play good defence against a good team. The personnel is the issue.
EDIT: Upon further review, having IQ guard Flagg and sticking Ingram on a washed Klay was a horrible move. Lost us the game.
You have 2 other seasons to lean on as a sample. I get it, the roster isnt built properly, but that doesnt mean you cannot judge the coach on what hes actually accomplished
It’s really hard to judge honestly. Sometimes the players you have are just the players you have. Hard to make anything work when you have three guys in your starting lineup who can’t keep anyone in front of them.
not strong, only aggresive cuz the power ain't directed/ that's why, we are subjected to the will of the oppressive
Re: PG: Need some Darko Magic
-
DemHeavyHands
- Starter
- Posts: 2,221
- And1: 3,113
- Joined: Dec 11, 2022
-
Re: PG: Need some Darko Magic
YogurtProducer wrote:Madvillainy2004 wrote:DemHeavyHands wrote:“yOu AsKeD fOr AnAlYsIS”
I watched every Cole bucket + assist and man Ingram was guarding Cole more than IQ was lmao
Unreal to acually be provided with the data, and instead of just taking the L, to double down on childish ****
Why do you act like a dumbass tho?
Obviously IQ won’t be responsible for every single bucket, so I don’t know why you went through each point like that clears him. If you’re watching the game like you said you are, then you’ll clearly see that IQ has been awful on defense. It’s not even just dlo or Cole, anytime he was stuck on Cooper Flagg he showed no resistance. Obviously it’s a mismatch but at least fight to push him out
You think IQ has been good on defense?
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
- LoveMyRaps
- RealGM
- Posts: 29,837
- And1: 50,305
- Joined: Jun 10, 2013
-
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
Such a well rounded performance by Scottie.
Making a couple mid range jumpers it the key to unlocking the 3pt shot for him intra-game.
Making a couple mid range jumpers it the key to unlocking the 3pt shot for him intra-game.
In Masai We Trust 


Re: PG: Need some Darko Magic
-
YogurtProducer
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,798
- And1: 33,474
- Joined: Jul 22, 2013
- Location: Saskatchewan
-
Re: PG: Need some Darko Magic
What exactly did I do to act like a dumbass?DemHeavyHands wrote:Why do you act like a dumbass tho?
It was not even that IQ was responsible for every single bucket... it was that he was not even on the floor for most of the damage the players you referenced. Which kind of supports my theory that people are looking for someone to blame and for some reason have honed in on IQ for whatever reason.Obviously IQ won’t be responsible for every single bucket, so I don’t know why you went through each point like that clears him.
I have watched the game, and I am not seeing "awful" by any means.If you’re watching the game like you said you are, then you’ll clearly see that IQ has been awful on defense. It’s not even just dlo or Cole, anytime he was stuck on Cooper Flagg he showed no resistance. Obviously it’s a mismatch but at least fight to push him out
But lol at bringing up Cooper Flagg like any PG in the league who is a normal size stands a chance against a 6'9 player like that.
He has been fine. Not a liability like you are making it out and not amazing. FAR from our problem defensively. Ingram has been a turnstile, and a lot of the "IQ BAD" can be attributed to some poor communication defensively with just poor switching and weird rotations, which kind of makes sense in game 3 of a starting lineup that has barely played together.You think IQ has been good on defense?
A lot of the complaints about IQ would be made about 90% of the NBA's starting PGs. It just screams to me that guys don't watch other teams to actually have reasonable expectations.
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
-
Shakril
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,065
- And1: 2,277
- Joined: Feb 10, 2023
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
MEDIC wrote:Shakril wrote:MEDIC wrote:
Here's an honest question:
What would you rather have:
Davion Mitchell - 12 million
Immanuel Quickley - 32.5 million
Depends on the goal. If i want to be competitive, IQ. Otherwise Mitchell.
I don't think the needle moves much. One is 1/3 of the price & is way better at defense. One if 3x the price & is better at shooting 3's.
Neither is an elite floor general. Davion probably has the better 1st step, but neither is a great finished around the rim.
IQ is the far better playmaker, and thats what i want out from him and that he is decent from 3. That his D wasnt good applies to everyone, even Barnes. Thats more a collective problem.
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
-
YogurtProducer
- RealGM
- Posts: 30,798
- And1: 33,474
- Joined: Jul 22, 2013
- Location: Saskatchewan
-
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
LoveMyRaps wrote:Such a well rounded performance by Scottie.
Making a couple mid range jumpers it the key to unlocking the 3pt shot for him intra-game.
Best version of Scottie. Not really trying to create anything himself and playing off others.
I still hate the early clock 3s despite him making them. They're just horrible shots for him to take as I don't yet buy him being a plus 3 point guy lol
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
- MEDIC
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,640
- And1: 11,377
- Joined: Jul 25, 2006
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
Shakril wrote:MEDIC wrote:Shakril wrote:
Depends on the goal. If i want to be competitive, IQ. Otherwise Mitchell.
I don't think the needle moves much. One is 1/3 of the price & is way better at defense. One if 3x the price & is better at shooting 3's.
Neither is an elite floor general. Davion probably has the better 1st step, but neither is a great finished around the rim.
IQ is the far better playmaker, and thats what i want out from him and that he is decent from 3. That his D wasnt good applies to everyone, even Barnes. Thats more a collective problem.
Come on man. IQ's man defense has been Calderon-esque since he landed here.
IQ's playmaking looked improved in the last pre-season game.& the game against the Hawks. I will give him that. We will have to see about the rest of the season.

* Props to the man, the myth, the legend......TZ.
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
-
Tripod
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,328
- And1: 12,824
- Joined: Aug 13, 2021
-
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
YogurtProducer wrote:LoveMyRaps wrote:Such a well rounded performance by Scottie.
Making a couple mid range jumpers it the key to unlocking the 3pt shot for him intra-game.
Best version of Scottie. Not really trying to create anything himself and playing off others.
I still hate the early clock 3s despite him making them. They're just horrible shots for him to take as I don't yet buy him being a plus 3 point guy lol
Yeah I have no confidence in his 3's going in and prefer he just take them when wide open.
Quite sure he is going to go cold while IQ heats up. The data says that will happen then Barnes gets ripped and IQ gets praise.
I said pre-season that reality is, not everyone plays good games every night. So I expect different nights for different guys within the 4 to lead us in scoring. We need to hunt mismatches and the hot guy to take advantage and the guys struggling or in the "bad" matchup, need to accept that, for the team.
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
- HiJiNX
- Forum Mod - Raptors

- Posts: 16,527
- And1: 15,813
- Joined: Mar 19, 2004
- Location: T-Dot
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
MEDIC wrote:HiJiNX wrote:MEDIC wrote:You can't become an elite defensive team in the NBA with a PG that can't keep his man in front. Quick was getting cooked over and over again by a PG that isn't even all that fast. We need our Jrue Holiday type PG. Like I said in the game thread, this team looked better with the Mitchell/ Shead tandem.
It seemed like Raps gave up on full court defense. Too much effort. Are they rebelling against Darko already? The Mavs didn't look bothered by anything the Raps were doing.
I agree that I liked us when we had Davion and Shead. It was 48 minutes of tough defence that other teams struggled with.
Here's an honest question:
What would you rather have:
Davion Mitchell - 12 million
Immanuel Quickley - 32.5 million
Davion
not strong, only aggresive cuz the power ain't directed/ that's why, we are subjected to the will of the oppressive
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
-
ConSarnit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,275
- And1: 6,018
- Joined: May 05, 2015
-
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
The good news is we’re due for some positive regression as far as rim protection goes. Poeltl, Barnes and Mamu (expected) rim protection numbers have been terrible. We’re getting cooked at the rim, both in terms of shot volume and fg%. Barnes and Poeltl will not be near as bad as their early numbers suggest. Hopefully Poeltl gets healthy soon because if he’s lumbering around we’re in trouble. Anyone have access to second spectrum data concerning blow by stats? Don’t want to pin all of our defensive woes on our front court as the eye test implies our perimeter defenders aren’t doing a great job keeping their man in front of them.
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
- bape_lovers
- RealGM
- Posts: 25,013
- And1: 19,114
- Joined: Oct 28, 2010
- Location: 6ix side
-
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
You gonna get based for saying any regarding Freddy
Madvillainy2004 wrote:TorontoBarneys wrote:Is this team better than the '21-22 team?
Fred and Siakam > BI and IQ

Credit to JaysRule, Detective
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
- Brinbe
- RealGM
- Posts: 66,241
- And1: 41,023
- Joined: Feb 26, 2005
- Location: Terana
-
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
HiJiNX wrote:MEDIC wrote:HiJiNX wrote:I agree that I liked us when we had Davion and Shead. It was 48 minutes of tough defence that other teams struggled with.
Here's an honest question:
What would you rather have:
Davion Mitchell - 12 million
Immanuel Quickley - 32.5 million
Davion
yep. a much better fit with their defensive scheme/mentality and he's fine as a fifth starter. IQ has gotta score at a high level to justify that contract and he's not looking likely to reach that based on what we've seen and he can't defend lead guards at all. The Knicks had it right with what he was as an off-ball scoring guard.
And it's tough because I really like IQ's attitude/personality but the play on the court is what matters most.

Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
-
Jadoogar
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,409
- And1: 17,058
- Joined: May 06, 2010
-
Re: PG: Need some Dark(o) Magic (1-2)
i really hope Poeltl is just dealing with an injury because otherwise, woof.
For a team that's been preaching defense, it's really sad that we couldn't stop a team with no lead guards
For a team that's been preaching defense, it's really sad that we couldn't stop a team with no lead guards









