ImageImage

Game 7: Packers at Steelers - 10/26/25 - 7:20 - NBC

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis, humanrefutation

ReginaldDwight
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,852
And1: 2,440
Joined: Feb 11, 2015
   

Re: Game 7: Packers at Steelers - 10/26/25 - 7:20 - NBC 

Post#561 » by ReginaldDwight » Tue Oct 28, 2025 2:51 am

ReasonablySober wrote:Maybe the biggest example of a RB falling off a cliff is Shaun Alexander. He had 1704 carries prior to the season his career took a nose dive. Jacobs has 1730. He's got serious tread on the tires.

Also had about 500 more carries then Jacobs in college. He looks hurt pretty clearly.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 105,180
And1: 57,237
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

Re: Game 7: Packers at Steelers - 10/26/25 - 7:20 - NBC 

Post#562 » by MickeyDavis » Tue Oct 28, 2025 3:23 am

Jacobs is hurt. I'll give him the season. He's having a better year than he had 2 years ago. His average yards per reception are at a career high. Seems premature to write him off.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 9,048
And1: 5,085
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: Game 7: Packers at Steelers - 10/26/25 - 7:20 - NBC 

Post#563 » by RRyder823 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 5:16 am

MickeyDavis wrote:I'll wait until his calf is healed before writing him off. He's 27 not 30. Sure you can find examples of RBs who fall off at 27. And many who did not ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Its the touches more then the age that does in RBs. And Jacobs has a LOT of touches for a 27 year old

Sent from my SM-S918U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Ron Swanson
RealGM
Posts: 26,104
And1: 30,110
Joined: May 15, 2013

Re: Game 7: Packers at Steelers - 10/26/25 - 7:20 - NBC 

Post#564 » by Ron Swanson » Tue Oct 28, 2025 1:47 pm

I'm not gonna go as far as saying he's completely cooked, but the warning signs are all there. Everybody clowned that take after the Bengals game but the reality is that's usually how these things go and it's not just some hard cutoff. These guys will have that one game where you'll think "He's still got it!", but then follow it up with two straight games where they don't crack 50 scrimmage yards and/or 3.5 yards per touch.

I think we all knew when we signed Jacobs to that contract that it was essentially a 2-year proposition (dead cap hit of $6.2 mil this offseason). But I mean, if he's hurt, then he probably shouldn't be out there either way, and that's the issue here. Let Wilson carry the workload next week, and if Lloyd still isn't good to go, you're gonna need to scour the waiver wire for a cheap practice squad body or something.
User avatar
humanrefutation
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 33,222
And1: 16,918
Joined: Jun 05, 2006
       

Re: Game 7: Packers at Steelers - 10/26/25 - 7:20 - NBC 

Post#565 » by humanrefutation » Tue Oct 28, 2025 2:16 pm

The underlying metrics weren't as favorable for Jacobs last year.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/insider/story/_/id/41959769/older-nfl-rbs-thriving-impact-future-contracts-free-agency-deals-money-2025-henry-barkley

Bill Barnwell wrote:Josh Jacobs has been below average in Green Bay.

Jacobs' deal with the Packers: Four years, $48 million

Jacobs hasn't been quite as productive as Mixon, let alone Barkley or Henry. Jacobs has topped 100 rushing yards in a game just once, with that coming on a 32-carry, 151-yard effort against Indianapolis in backup quarterback Malik Willis' first start for Green Bay. While his 4.5-yards per carry average is respectable, it pales in comparison to that of the other backs we've discussed. Jacobs also has fumbled twice, while Barkley, Henry and Mixon have combined for just one.

The biggest problem for Jacobs is that he hasn't been able to keep the offense on time. I mentioned how Mixon's first-down success rate is below league average. Jacobs' is even worse; he is keeping the offense ahead of schedule on just 28.2% of his first-down carries and 33.3% of his total carries. Among backs with at least 70 carries, that latter figure ranks 21st out of 24 players. Only Najee Harris, D'Andre Swift and Breece Hall have been less effective at keeping the offense on track for first downs this season.

Jacobs has been better than the other backs in Green Bay's offense, but not by much. He has generated 79 RYOF on 120 carries or 0.7 RYOE per carry. Emanue. Wilson, the team's No. 2 back after the injuries suffered by MarShawn Lloyd and AJ Dillon, has put up 18 RYOE on 47 carries or 0.4 RYOE per carry. Wilson also has averaged 4.7 yards per carry and posted a 44.7% success rate. Lloyd and Chris Brooks have been replacement level on their 13 touches, which helps boost Jacobs a bit, but there's not that chasm between him and the other backs that we saw with Mixon.

It's OK to post below-average success rates if a back is generating big plays, but Jacobs hasn't really thrived there, either. Fifteen of his 120 carries have gone for 10- plus yards, which is a respectable 12.5%, but he has only four carries over 20 yards and hasn't hit anything longer than 34 yards so far. That 3.3% 20-plus-yard carry rate is fine, but it's not moving the needle as compared to Barkley and Henry. And four of those five runs came during the first two weeks of the season. The one exception was last week against the Texans, and it came on a play in which coach Matt LaFleur himself might have been able to take the field and run for a first down.

In the passing game, Jacobs has averaged just over one yard per route run, which is solid but just below league average. What he has been so far is the guy we saw for most of his tenure with the Raiders (with the exception of his excellent 2022 campaign, which was driven by an out-of-character explosive play rate). He has absorbed a heavy workload and delivered -- depending on which metric you're using -- below-average to slightly above-average results in return.

Each of the prior three teams would probably feel pretty good about getting the production they've received for what they paid in free agency. Jacobs might not qualify there. While the headlines suggested the Packers gave him a four-year, $48 million deal, he really landed a one-year, $14.1 million contract with three team options. At this rate, I imagine Green Bay would be better off moving on from him.
User avatar
BUCKnation
RealGM
Posts: 20,189
And1: 4,582
Joined: Jun 15, 2011
       

Re: Game 7: Packers at Steelers - 10/26/25 - 7:20 - NBC 

Post#566 » by BUCKnation » Tue Oct 28, 2025 2:50 pm

I don't think the line is helping at all, but there is definitely seems to be some real smoke to the fire of the trade rumors linking us to rb's.
User avatar
mlloyd10
General Manager
Posts: 8,097
And1: 970
Joined: Jan 18, 2012
     

Re: Game 7: Packers at Steelers - 10/26/25 - 7:20 - NBC 

Post#567 » by mlloyd10 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 3:18 pm

Jacobs needs to sit...rest this week and be ready for Eagles
User avatar
Finn
Starter
Posts: 2,364
And1: 2,612
Joined: Aug 14, 2009
       

Re: Game 7: Packers at Steelers - 10/26/25 - 7:20 - NBC 

Post#568 » by Finn » Tue Oct 28, 2025 8:02 pm

mlloyd10 wrote:Whats up with Golden - He deactivated his instagram account after the game. It seems like every time he has a bad week or isn't involved, he pouts

Wait! People actually give a **** about Instagram, or any social media? Could all disappear overnight for all I care.
HKPackFan
RealGM
Posts: 15,657
And1: 11,002
Joined: Jan 14, 2014
Location: Hong Kong
   

Re: Game 7: Packers at Steelers - 10/26/25 - 7:20 - NBC 

Post#569 » by HKPackFan » Sun Nov 2, 2025 1:59 am

Finn wrote:
mlloyd10 wrote:Whats up with Golden - He deactivated his instagram account after the game. It seems like every time he has a bad week or isn't involved, he pouts

Wait! People actually give a **** about Instagram, or any social media? Could all disappear overnight for all I care.



The younger generation has been on it since childhood.


For deactivating, early days giannis would shut it down during the season, Rodgers also used to shut it down during the season.

It's probably a smart move.

They didn't want the distraction. Or getting caught up in their head with comments from people.
#FreeChuckDiesel

Return to Green Bay Packers