ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,392
And1: 22,802
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1941 » by Klomp » Wed Oct 29, 2025 5:48 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
Klomp wrote:Dare I mention Tyus Jones as an option?


Its only 68 minutes, but he's off to a disastrous start - so he might be available. If we could flip Miller for him, it would be great.

--edit--

Holy crap. I didn't realize Tyus is making 7M...

Yep....he would have to be in the Donte category of trades
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,031
And1: 6,051
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1942 » by Devilzsidewalk » Wed Oct 29, 2025 7:15 pm

What about Dillingham and Lenny Miller for Anthony Black? There were reports Minnesota had interest in him pre-draft. His size is way more along the lines of what Finch likes. His defense is legit, but the big PG thoughts have evolved into more of a combo guard at best.

why for Orlando: They've got a lot of money locked up already, and Black's extension is looming. This would extend their financial timeline while returning an intriguing prospect and so they maintain more financial flexibility. I think this would be the main reasoning for them by far - some reprehension about committing even more money and locking themselves down into a team that has yet to take that next leap.

why NOT for Orlando: Black's size gives them lineup versatility and can play with other Point guards. And he's shown a high enough floor that he can fill in for Suggs if he gets injured again. Dillingham is an unknown and can't pair with Tyus for example.

why for MN: they get a viable long-term PG prospect that doesn't sacrifice their defensive expectations. He's shown some signs that he might develop into a solid off-ball floor spacer too.

why NOT for MN: while they'll regain some financial flexibility with Conley coming off the books, they still have to figure out Jaylen Clark's future and also replace almost the entire bottom half of the roster, so there'd be some financial questions to work though on extending Black. Also the risk of trading low-floor / high-ceilng for high-floor / low-ceiling. You'd have to consider the possibility that we're looking back and heavily regretting this move 5 years from now. If Rob is a star and Black has settled into a Delon Wright type, then that's the type of stuff that can force your star player out. Though Black is only 21 and already playable, so maybe his ceiling has more potential than we know.
Image
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,392
And1: 22,802
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1943 » by Klomp » Wed Oct 29, 2025 7:21 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:What about Dillingham and Lenny Miller for Anthony Black? There were reports Minnesota had interest in him pre-draft. His size is way more along the lines of what Finch likes. His defense is legit, but the big PG thoughts have evolved into more of a combo guard at best.

why for Orlando: They've got a lot of money locked up already, and Black's extension is looming. This would extend their financial timeline while returning an intriguing prospect and so they maintain more financial flexibility. I think this would be the main reasoning for them by far - some reprehension about committing even more money and locking themselves down into a team that has yet to take that next leap.

why NOT for Orlando: Black's size gives them lineup versatility and can play with other Point guards. And he's shown a high enough floor that he can fill in for Suggs if he gets injured again. Dillingham is an unknown and can't pair with Tyus for example.

why for MN: they get a viable long-term PG prospect that doesn't sacrifice their defensive expectations. He's shown some signs that he might develop into a solid off-ball floor spacer too.

why NOT for MN: while they'll regain some financial flexibility with Conley coming off the books, they still have to figure out Jaylen Clark's future and also replace almost the entire bottom half of the roster, so there'd be some financial questions to work though on extending Black. Also the risk of trading low-floor / high-ceilng for high-floor / low-ceiling. You'd have to consider the possibility that we're looking back and heavily regretting this move 5 years from now. If Rob is a star and Black has settled into a Delon Wright type, then that's the type of stuff that can force your star player out. Though Black is only 21 and already playable, so maybe his ceiling has more potential than we know.

I like this for both teams.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,800
And1: 3,492
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1944 » by BlacJacMac » Wed Oct 29, 2025 7:25 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:What about Dillingham and Lenny Miller for Anthony Black? There were reports Minnesota had interest in him pre-draft. His size is way more along the lines of what Finch likes. His defense is legit, but the big PG thoughts have evolved into more of a combo guard at best.

why for Orlando: They've got a lot of money locked up already, and Black's extension is looming. This would extend their financial timeline while returning an intriguing prospect and so they maintain more financial flexibility. I think this would be the main reasoning for them by far - some reprehension about committing even more money and locking themselves down into a team that has yet to take that next leap.

why NOT for Orlando: Black's size gives them lineup versatility and can play with other Point guards. And he's shown a high enough floor that he can fill in for Suggs if he gets injured again. Dillingham is an unknown and can't pair with Tyus for example.

why for MN: they get a viable long-term PG prospect that doesn't sacrifice their defensive expectations. He's shown some signs that he might develop into a solid off-ball floor spacer too.

why NOT for MN: while they'll regain some financial flexibility with Conley coming off the books, they still have to figure out Jaylen Clark's future and also replace almost the entire bottom half of the roster, so there'd be some financial questions to work though on extending Black. Also the risk of trading low-floor / high-ceilng for high-floor / low-ceiling. You'd have to consider the possibility that we're looking back and heavily regretting this move 5 years from now. If Rob is a star and Black has settled into a Delon Wright type, then that's the type of stuff that can force your star player out. Though Black is only 21 and already playable, so maybe his ceiling has more potential than we know.


I would do this one.

I think another NOT for Orlando would be Jase Richardson. He's probably a combo guard, but it sounds like they want to give him every chance to see if he can play PG.

Can you develop Richardson and Dilly simultaneously?
Burgs_Burgi
Ballboy
Posts: 43
And1: 24
Joined: Sep 30, 2025
Location: New Zealand
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1945 » by Burgs_Burgi » Wed Oct 29, 2025 7:32 pm

Klomp wrote:
Devilzsidewalk wrote:What about Dillingham and Lenny Miller for Anthony Black? There were reports Minnesota had interest in him pre-draft. His size is way more along the lines of what Finch likes. His defense is legit, but the big PG thoughts have evolved into more of a combo guard at best.

why for Orlando: They've got a lot of money locked up already, and Black's extension is looming. This would extend their financial timeline while returning an intriguing prospect and so they maintain more financial flexibility. I think this would be the main reasoning for them by far - some reprehension about committing even more money and locking themselves down into a team that has yet to take that next leap.

why NOT for Orlando: Black's size gives them lineup versatility and can play with other Point guards. And he's shown a high enough floor that he can fill in for Suggs if he gets injured again. Dillingham is an unknown and can't pair with Tyus for example.

why for MN: they get a viable long-term PG prospect that doesn't sacrifice their defensive expectations. He's shown some signs that he might develop into a solid off-ball floor spacer too.

why NOT for MN: while they'll regain some financial flexibility with Conley coming off the books, they still have to figure out Jaylen Clark's future and also replace almost the entire bottom half of the roster, so there'd be some financial questions to work though on extending Black. Also the risk of trading low-floor / high-ceilng for high-floor / low-ceiling. You'd have to consider the possibility that we're looking back and heavily regretting this move 5 years from now. If Rob is a star and Black has settled into a Delon Wright type, then that's the type of stuff that can force your star player out. Though Black is only 21 and already playable, so maybe his ceiling has more potential than we know.

I like this for both teams.


I second this one. Have been preaching this to a mate who is in agreeance.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,713
And1: 5,206
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1946 » by minimus » Wed Oct 29, 2025 9:39 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:What about Dillingham and Lenny Miller for Anthony Black? There were reports Minnesota had interest in him pre-draft. His size is way more along the lines of what Finch likes. His defense is legit, but the big PG thoughts have evolved into more of a combo guard at best.

why for Orlando: They've got a lot of money locked up already, and Black's extension is looming. This would extend their financial timeline while returning an intriguing prospect and so they maintain more financial flexibility. I think this would be the main reasoning for them by far - some reprehension about committing even more money and locking themselves down into a team that has yet to take that next leap.

why NOT for Orlando: Black's size gives them lineup versatility and can play with other Point guards. And he's shown a high enough floor that he can fill in for Suggs if he gets injured again. Dillingham is an unknown and can't pair with Tyus for example.

why for MN: they get a viable long-term PG prospect that doesn't sacrifice their defensive expectations. He's shown some signs that he might develop into a solid off-ball floor spacer too.

why NOT for MN: while they'll regain some financial flexibility with Conley coming off the books, they still have to figure out Jaylen Clark's future and also replace almost the entire bottom half of the roster, so there'd be some financial questions to work though on extending Black. Also the risk of trading low-floor / high-ceilng for high-floor / low-ceiling. You'd have to consider the possibility that we're looking back and heavily regretting this move 5 years from now. If Rob is a star and Black has settled into a Delon Wright type, then that's the type of stuff that can force your star player out. Though Black is only 21 and already playable, so maybe his ceiling has more potential than we know.



ORL IN: DDV, Champagnie, Miller
ORL OUT: Bitadze, Black

WAS IN: Dillingham
WAS OUT: Champagnie, 2026 late FRP

MIN IN: Bitadze, Black, AJ Johnson, 2026 late FRP
MIN OUT: DDV, Dillingham, Miller

Gobert/Bitadze/Beringer + Zikarsky
Randle/Reid + Freeman
McDaniels/TJ/Juzang
Edwards/Clark/Black
Conley/Black/Hyland
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,713
And1: 5,206
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1947 » by minimus » Yesterday 10:24 am

After watching a bit Anthony Black: I think that a trade built round DDV - Black swap might be beneficial for both teams: like MIN ORL are struggling mightily. ORL have enough comboguards with Suggs, Bane, Jase Richardson and have PG Tyus Jones. They could use DDV shooting and experience. While MIN could use Black size, on-ball defense and playmaking. The most intriguing part of Black skillset is his potential as big physical guard like Nembhard.

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter


Playing big and physical PG would lift our second unit.

Read on Twitter


I feel like Black skillset fits our needs better: Reid-Randle-TJ/Clark-Edwards-Black. This combination might offer balanced combination of rim pressure, perimeter defense, playmaking and shooting.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,031
And1: 6,051
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1948 » by Devilzsidewalk » Yesterday 12:21 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
Devilzsidewalk wrote:What about Dillingham and Lenny Miller for Anthony Black? There were reports Minnesota had interest in him pre-draft. His size is way more along the lines of what Finch likes. His defense is legit, but the big PG thoughts have evolved into more of a combo guard at best.

why for Orlando: They've got a lot of money locked up already, and Black's extension is looming. This would extend their financial timeline while returning an intriguing prospect and so they maintain more financial flexibility. I think this would be the main reasoning for them by far - some reprehension about committing even more money and locking themselves down into a team that has yet to take that next leap.

why NOT for Orlando: Black's size gives them lineup versatility and can play with other Point guards. And he's shown a high enough floor that he can fill in for Suggs if he gets injured again. Dillingham is an unknown and can't pair with Tyus for example.

why for MN: they get a viable long-term PG prospect that doesn't sacrifice their defensive expectations. He's shown some signs that he might develop into a solid off-ball floor spacer too.

why NOT for MN: while they'll regain some financial flexibility with Conley coming off the books, they still have to figure out Jaylen Clark's future and also replace almost the entire bottom half of the roster, so there'd be some financial questions to work though on extending Black. Also the risk of trading low-floor / high-ceilng for high-floor / low-ceiling. You'd have to consider the possibility that we're looking back and heavily regretting this move 5 years from now. If Rob is a star and Black has settled into a Delon Wright type, then that's the type of stuff that can force your star player out. Though Black is only 21 and already playable, so maybe his ceiling has more potential than we know.


I would do this one.

I think another NOT for Orlando would be Jase Richardson. He's probably a combo guard, but it sounds like they want to give him every chance to see if he can play PG.

Can you develop Richardson and Dilly simultaneously?


Great point - the size of Black and Suggs probably made that pick happen. Impossible to see Rob/Jase playing simultaneously.
Image
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,403
And1: 872
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1949 » by Norseman79 » Yesterday 12:36 pm

Complacency, pride, narcissism....
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,392
And1: 22,802
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1950 » by Klomp » Yesterday 7:00 pm

Honestly, I might be shifting from the next big move being Julius to the next big move being Rudy....
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
gandlogo
Senior
Posts: 557
And1: 419
Joined: Jun 14, 2017
Location: Fountain Inn, SC
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1951 » by gandlogo » Yesterday 8:04 pm

Klomp wrote:Honestly, I might be shifting from the next big move being Julius to the next big move being Rudy....


Welcome. A lot of us have wanted Gobert gone since 7/6/22.

Gobert and Ingles to Orlando for Black, Isaac, and Bitadze. Or something like it.
BlacJacMac
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,800
And1: 3,492
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1952 » by BlacJacMac » Yesterday 9:45 pm

gandlogo wrote:
Klomp wrote:Honestly, I might be shifting from the next big move being Julius to the next big move being Rudy....


Welcome. A lot of us have wanted Gobert gone since 7/6/22.

Gobert and Ingles to Orlando for Black, Isaac, and Bitadze. Or something like it.


I'd do that.

I'm a much bigger fan of Bitadze than Jamahl Mosley is apparently. All he does is positively impact offense and defense whenever he plays.

I've warmed more and more to Black.

I used to love Isaac, but he's kind of a nutcase and made of glass. But anything he gives us would be gravy.
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,474
And1: 2,877
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1953 » by Neeva » Yesterday 9:50 pm

Naz has to go before Rudy. I saw a trade on trade board that will work
naz, ddv for quickley, filler and two first from toronto. Quickley contract is terrible but he fills a need and wolves get two top ten picks out of it, I expect Raptors to continue to be awful even with Naz and ddv.

I really like the 2026 draft, wolves need to be careful with Ant’s health and not wear him down and they also need to find him a superstar partner to compete with OKC and he may come from the 2026 draft.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,392
And1: 22,802
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1954 » by Klomp » Yesterday 9:52 pm

Gobert and DiVincenzo for Markkanen

Abandon any semblance of defensive identity you're holding on to, and instead build around the team's offensive pieces in a five-out system.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,242
And1: 5,810
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1955 » by winforlose » Yesterday 10:02 pm

Klomp wrote:Gobert and DiVincenzo for Markkanen

Abandon any semblance of defensive identity you're holding on to, and instead build around the team's offensive pieces in a five-out system.


It wouldn’t work. We were the 30th best defense last year without Rudy. Markkanen is not that good offensively to replace the rebounding, easy baskets, and other flaws we would unleash. Plus he has injury issues.

I am open to trading Rudy, I said so in the offseason. He made much more sense when paired with a KAT type big. Without KAT (or equivalent big,) Rudy is not a good fit with Ant’s style of offense. That said, we need a defensive capable big who moves better, and a PG. it would probably be a multi player multi team deal, I just don’t know with who or for who.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,031
And1: 6,051
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1956 » by Devilzsidewalk » Yesterday 10:16 pm

lets get wacky. I'm thinking this is not a homer trade proposition because honestly feels like Minnesota is probably the most unlikely to say yes.

Brooklyn out: Nicolas Claxton / Terance Mann
Brooklyn in: Donte Divincenzo / Dejounte Murray

Minnesota out: Rudy Gobert / Donte DiVincenzo
Minnesota in: Nic Claxon / Terance Mann

New Orleans out: Dejounte Murray
New Orleans In: Rudy Gobert


Why for Brooklyn: They have tons of on-ball talent, Donte gives them another off-ball shooter along with MPJ. With Dejounte out, Brooklyn can commit to super tank mode this season, hopefully come back next year with Peterson, Dybantsa, or Boozer, a couple shooters, bunch of rookies who all got great playing time and seasoning, and now a healthy Dejounte Murray.

Why NOT for Brooklyn: I dunno, honestly I think it's a slam dunk for them because I'd jump at the chance to increase tanking odds for a great draft while not decreasing their net assets (assuming Murray comes back looking reasonable). But maybe they really like Claxton and/or Mann, who knows. They'd have to find a center to replace Claxton's minutes, which could be tough, but again, if you're just tanking then it's almost a good thing....

Why for MN: Claxton is a huge influx of frontcourt athleticism, more life offensively, and a lower salary. Mann isn't quite the shooter than DDV is, but at least as good a playmaker - if not better. HIs size and athleticism will give them more defensive pop over DDV.

Why NOT for MN: Claxton might be a numbers guy and too slight to actually anchor a top-shelf defense. He's never averaged over 10 rebounds a game. And losing DDV's shooting might hurt. He can let it fly from almost anywhere. Between losing him and NAW both, it's possible we end up feeling like we're too light on perimeter shooting. Also we'd have to deal with Rudy on a potential playoff competitor in the west. Also Beringer will now have to find an english-speaking mentor (though Claxton's game is probably more similar and easier to pattern after).

Why for New Orleans: They are off to a bad start - defense is in shambles. Rudy gives them a strong back line defender that could revamp their defensive identity into a positive direction. Murray is a zero and now that Fears and Poole are on board, he doesn't really have a strong fit anymore. Also Atlanta has their pick, so they have no tanking incentive - they want to be good asap.

Why NOT for New Orleans: maybe they like Queen and don't want to do anything that gets in the way of his minutes. Or possibly they think Murray, even despite the injury, is just a more valuable asset than Gobert.
Image
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,474
And1: 2,877
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1957 » by Neeva » Yesterday 11:49 pm

Klomp wrote:Honestly, I might be shifting from the next big move being Julius to the next big move being Rudy....


Why? Julius has been outplaying KAT except for rebounding and his contract is a steal compared to KAT
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,392
And1: 22,802
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1958 » by Klomp » Today 1:33 am

Neeva wrote:
Klomp wrote:Honestly, I might be shifting from the next big move being Julius to the next big move being Rudy....

Why? Julius has been outplaying KAT except for rebounding and his contract is a steal compared to KAT

(you might want to reread, that's kinda my point)
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,392
And1: 22,802
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1959 » by Klomp » Today 1:38 am

Is Donte DiVincenzo for Royce O'Neale a sell-low? (DiVincenzo would likely be rerouted to a third team)
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,474
And1: 2,877
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#1960 » by Neeva » Today 2:14 am

Ok then you only trade Rudy if the plan is to tank the season and Ant’s injuries will be a season long thing.. wolves will go nowhere without Rudy.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves