Phillybul wrote:I don’t think it matters imo when you made the “he hasn’t contributed to winning” comment. The fact is he’s never been in a situation to prove so. You didn’t even bother going him that much grace. And you’re kinda doubling down when you said you’re still not sold he contributes to winning given this season. Crediting other players for the wins. Especially embiid whose minutes are being managed (21mpg).  
 
 George can play 3 and 4. McCain can play 1 and 2. Grimes has flexibility to play 1-2-3. And it’s a very good chance George too will have his minutes monitored much like Embiid to an extent. Given he’s coming back from injury and how him rushing back last year hindered his effectiveness. Altho just me speculating what Sixers do. One thing the sixers ga e consistently been lackluster, average at best at? Bench production. A guy like grimes can contribute to making that bench stronger. He can counter any injuries to other starters. Or someone having a cold streak. But I don’t know how sixers will value him come trade deadline. I say keep him and ride this season out. He’s been consistently good since he has been here. Go sixers
 
Off course it matters because until now, Grimes has never proved to be a player that contributed to winning games. 
Now he has a chance to prove something, but that's redundant because our FO had to decide this summer what to do. 
I also said we won our last 4 games because of Maxey and VJ (not only Embiid). How many minutes did those guys play? 
Those are 3 Allstar level players (VJ not really off course, but his impact atm is high), I feel that that does something for a team indeed. More than Grimes' impact fi, what doesn't mean he's not a good player and helps us win those games too. 
Last season, we were without Maxey, George and Joel for the last 20-21 games I checked. Grimes was our main man than. We won 3 of those. Fair to say he hadn't proved himself as a winning type of player, which isn't a knock on him either. Just, you're deciding how much you have to pay that man. 
You"re saying he didn't have the chance to prove himself as an impactplayer, I say he hasn't shown it. It's actually the same. But the fact is, there was no prove so he didn't get paid. It's that simple. And it was the right decision. 
And because he hasn't proven yet to be that player that really impacts winning, they decided not to throw big money at him, which is off course the smartest thing. Other teams apparently valued him the same as the Sixers (and me?), because otherwise, he would have had his payday somewhere and wasn't here anymore.
You can ride him out, but Sixers don't have that much money to throw at him. On the other hand, he has a trade veto. But with McCain coming back (and PG), the minutes on guard and SF will diminish, so him veto'ing a trade to a team where he can get more exposure, would not be smart either? 
Indeed interesting to see how this turns out. 
I bet he's a FA this summer and Sixers will not retain him. Let's hope he has a ring by than  
