The Lauri Markkanen trade situation

Moderators: Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, MoneyTalks41890, HartfordWhalers, Texas Chuck, BullyKing, Andre Roberstan, loserX, Trader_Joe

Daddy 801
General Manager
Posts: 8,657
And1: 3,081
Joined: May 14, 2013
 

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#81 » by Daddy 801 » Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:57 am

tester551 wrote:
NYG wrote:Jerami Grant, Scoot Henderson, Earlier of Bucks/Blazers 2030 Unprotected First Round Draft Pick and 2032 Blazers Unprotected First Round Draft Pick for Lauri Markkanen?

Overpaying


Picks that are 5 and 7 years out is a hard pill to swallow. It would be knowing you are ranking for 5 years and hopefully get a few good guys ready to go in 2030 and then have amazing pieces that can add to your core.

So I’m not sure it’s an overpay. The time value of an unprotected pick in 5 and 7 years is worth a lot less than an unprotected pick in the next 1-3 years.
Jkam31
Head Coach
Posts: 6,881
And1: 5,835
Joined: Feb 23, 2014

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#82 » by Jkam31 » Thu Oct 30, 2025 8:46 am

BlazersBroncos wrote:I still really like his fit in San Antonio. I also think SAS should move Fox, as unrealistic as that sounds.

SAS OUT - Fox, Olynyk, 1 FRP
SAS IN - Markkanen

MIA OUT - Rozier, JJJ, 2 FRP
MIA IN - Fox

UTA OUT - Markkanen
UTA IN - Rozier, Olynyk, JJJ, 1 SAS FRP, 2 MIA FRP

Then SAS runs w/ -

G - Castle / Harper
G - Vassell / Harper
F - Barnes / Champagine / Keldon
F - Markkanen / Sochan / Keldon
C - Wemby / Kornet



I don’t get y’all fox is a big time playoff performer went head to head with Steph the spurs need an elite perimeter scorer why trade him. They can get Lauri without trading fox, castle, or Harper
Wolveswin
General Manager
Posts: 8,324
And1: 3,083
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#83 » by Wolveswin » Thu Oct 30, 2025 12:00 pm

If Philly thinks they are legit, pretty good offer.

Markkanen/Anderson

FOR

George/McCain/3x 1sts

McCain could be sent to 3rd team, many desperate for a PG (like Rockets), for additional 1st or two.

George takes the long road back. Ainge can try and rehab for trade at much later time or buyout at later time. Either option helps the tank this year.
tcheco
Starter
Posts: 2,322
And1: 1,551
Joined: Jan 15, 2015

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#84 » by tcheco » Thu Oct 30, 2025 12:10 pm

Jkam31 wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:I still really like his fit in San Antonio. I also think SAS should move Fox, as unrealistic as that sounds.

SAS OUT - Fox, Olynyk, 1 FRP
SAS IN - Markkanen

MIA OUT - Rozier, JJJ, 2 FRP
MIA IN - Fox

UTA OUT - Markkanen
UTA IN - Rozier, Olynyk, JJJ, 1 SAS FRP, 2 MIA FRP

Then SAS runs w/ -

G - Castle / Harper
G - Vassell / Harper
F - Barnes / Champagine / Keldon
F - Markkanen / Sochan / Keldon
C - Wemby / Kornet



I don’t get y’all fox is a big time playoff performer went head to head with Steph the spurs need an elite perimeter scorer why trade him. They can get Lauri without trading fox, castle, or Harper


Fox played 1 playoff series where he shot 5-19 for 16 points and 5 TO in an elimination game 3 seasons ago.

He won't be traded, but I get why people might choose depth over Fox considering how much he gets paid. That being said, Fox, if healthy, can contribute, the question would be if he can be more positive than Vassel's improved defense and 3 point shooting(since Vassel would have to be sent out to gete Markkanen)
Jkam31
Head Coach
Posts: 6,881
And1: 5,835
Joined: Feb 23, 2014

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#85 » by Jkam31 » Thu Oct 30, 2025 4:06 pm

tcheco wrote:
Jkam31 wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:I still really like his fit in San Antonio. I also think SAS should move Fox, as unrealistic as that sounds.

SAS OUT - Fox, Olynyk, 1 FRP
SAS IN - Markkanen

MIA OUT - Rozier, JJJ, 2 FRP
MIA IN - Fox

UTA OUT - Markkanen
UTA IN - Rozier, Olynyk, JJJ, 1 SAS FRP, 2 MIA FRP

Then SAS runs w/ -

G - Castle / Harper
G - Vassell / Harper
F - Barnes / Champagine / Keldon
F - Markkanen / Sochan / Keldon
C - Wemby / Kornet



I don’t get y’all fox is a big time playoff performer went head to head with Steph the spurs need an elite perimeter scorer why trade him. They can get Lauri without trading fox, castle, or Harper


Fox played 1 playoff series where he shot 5-19 for 16 points and 5 TO in an elimination game 3 seasons ago.

He won't be traded, but I get why people might choose depth over Fox considering how much he gets paid. That being said, Fox, if healthy, can contribute, the question would be if he can be more positive than Vassel's improved defense and 3 point shooting(since Vassel would have to be sent out to gete Markkanen)


You know he was hurt right? He went toe to toe with curry that whole series outside that game and they won if he’s healthy or Sabonis doesn’t get assaulted
hugepatsfan
General Manager
Posts: 8,896
And1: 9,362
Joined: May 28, 2020
       

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#86 » by hugepatsfan » Thu Oct 30, 2025 4:21 pm

Jkam31 wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:I still really like his fit in San Antonio. I also think SAS should move Fox, as unrealistic as that sounds.

SAS OUT - Fox, Olynyk, 1 FRP
SAS IN - Markkanen

MIA OUT - Rozier, JJJ, 2 FRP
MIA IN - Fox

UTA OUT - Markkanen
UTA IN - Rozier, Olynyk, JJJ, 1 SAS FRP, 2 MIA FRP

Then SAS runs w/ -

G - Castle / Harper
G - Vassell / Harper
F - Barnes / Champagine / Keldon
F - Markkanen / Sochan / Keldon
C - Wemby / Kornet



I don’t get y’all fox is a big time playoff performer went head to head with Steph the spurs need an elite perimeter scorer why trade him. They can get Lauri without trading fox, castle, or Harper


His 52.4% true shooting percentage in the playoffs was bad. He shot 42%/33% from the field if you just use raw percentages, both also bad. He had 4 turnovers per game - bad. He went head to head with Steph and was high volume, inefficient. He's not an elite perimeter scorer. Not even close. To be an elite perimeter scorer you need some efficiency.
tcheco
Starter
Posts: 2,322
And1: 1,551
Joined: Jan 15, 2015

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#87 » by tcheco » Thu Oct 30, 2025 5:27 pm

Jkam31 wrote:
tcheco wrote:
Jkam31 wrote:

I don’t get y’all fox is a big time playoff performer went head to head with Steph the spurs need an elite perimeter scorer why trade him. They can get Lauri without trading fox, castle, or Harper


Fox played 1 playoff series where he shot 5-19 for 16 points and 5 TO in an elimination game 3 seasons ago.

He won't be traded, but I get why people might choose depth over Fox considering how much he gets paid. That being said, Fox, if healthy, can contribute, the question would be if he can be more positive than Vassel's improved defense and 3 point shooting(since Vassel would have to be sent out to gete Markkanen)


You know he was hurt right? He went toe to toe with curry that whole series outside that game and they won if he’s healthy or Sabonis doesn’t get assaulted


Everyone is hurt at some point. Surely if Fox going toe to toe with Curry one playoff series while being hurt really signifies how he impacts winning, he should've made the playoffs more times by now? A lower seed warriors beat them and then the following year he got eliminated in the play-in by Jonas and Ingram while shooting 12-29.

Sure he is not terrible, but he is not a star, and he is paid like one. As a Spurs fan, the trade was premature at the time, but I get why they did it, low value picks were moved, but the money spent on his extension is crazy, limits their future moves and decisions, which is why most people would look at moving him if anyone wants to bite the bullet.

Once again, that being said, he will benefit with playing with Wemby, and should get good numbers, but his size and lack of a reliable 3 ball worry me in the long run
QMemphis
Rookie
Posts: 1,060
And1: 624
Joined: May 22, 2018
     

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#88 » by QMemphis » Thu Oct 30, 2025 6:31 pm

babyjax13 wrote:
QMemphis wrote:Grizz could offer a pretty competitive package for Lauri if we choose to go that direction.

Santi/BC/Konchar/3 1st (Suns and Magic/Grizz in 26 1sts plus Magic 1st in 30)

I would easily do that but dont really understand Memphis trading Bane for Lauri, effectively. Seems financially to be a bad decision if they traded Bane because of cost.



We traded Bane primarily for fit, the money played a portion but with our young guys Ced, Wells, Pippen and Edey locked of for 3 more years it could make sense if we go all in. Also still have vets in KCP and Ty on the roster.

Ja/Coward/Lauri/Jaren/Edey
Ty/Pip/Wells/KCP

GG/Vince/OMax

That’s a title level group if things break right.
Jojothewhale
Senior
Posts: 504
And1: 346
Joined: Dec 20, 2011

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#89 » by Jojothewhale » Thu Oct 30, 2025 6:45 pm

Wolveswin wrote:If Philly thinks they are legit, pretty good offer.

Markkanen/Anderson

FOR

George/McCain/3x 1sts

McCain could be sent to 3rd team, many desperate for a PG (like Rockets), for additional 1st or two.

George takes the long road back. Ainge can try and rehab for trade at much later time or buyout at later time. Either option helps the tank this year.


Forget value. Markannen only makes sense as a Sixers trade target if Embiid is healthy. The whole reason they almost traded for him last year was that fit.

They’re a downright horrendous defensive team if they make this deal and Embiid is even a half step below his defensive prime. Right now, it looks like his offense is coming around. But his defense is non-functional. He’s not even attempting to challenge shots.
Wolveswin
General Manager
Posts: 8,324
And1: 3,083
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#90 » by Wolveswin » Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:21 pm

Jojothewhale wrote:
Wolveswin wrote:If Philly thinks they are legit, pretty good offer.

Markkanen/Anderson

FOR

George/McCain/3x 1sts

McCain could be sent to 3rd team, many desperate for a PG (like Rockets), for additional 1st or two.

George takes the long road back. Ainge can try and rehab for trade at much later time or buyout at later time. Either option helps the tank this year.


Forget value. Markannen only makes sense as a Sixers trade target if Embiid is healthy. The whole reason they almost traded for him last year was that fit.

They’re a downright horrendous defensive team if they make this deal and Embiid is even a half step below his defensive prime. Right now, it looks like his offense is coming around. But his defense is non-functional. He’s not even attempting to challenge shots.

Everything 76ers do is based on Embiid health. 76ers are a nice early success story - but without Embiid will fade and won’t be a real player come playoffs. So…

Yes, a 76ers all-in trade means Embiid is ready/healthy to lead 76ers into playoffs - and adding Markkanen is additive to what is in place (including Embiid).
Jojothewhale
Senior
Posts: 504
And1: 346
Joined: Dec 20, 2011

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#91 » by Jojothewhale » Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:28 pm

Wolveswin wrote:Yes, a 76ers all-in trade means Embiid is ready/healthy to lead 76ers into playoffs - and adding Markkanen is additive to what is in place (including Embiid).


Then I still hate the value. I’m not sure that team is materially better and it cost them everything that isn’t nailed down, plus Grimes walking in free agency. That last bit is happening anyway, but they keep their picks without doing the deal.

No one is taking PG at any price close to palatable when he’s probably not as bad as he was last year post-quitting. Another team would be insane to take on the risk, so they have to ride it out for now.
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,928
And1: 14,264
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#92 » by JRoy » Thu Oct 30, 2025 7:30 pm

NYG wrote:Jerami Grant, Scoot Henderson, Earlier of Bucks/Blazers 2030 Unprotected First Round Draft Pick and 2032 Blazers Unprotected First Round Draft Pick for Lauri Markkanen?


Pass for POR.

Grant and one of those picks.

Scratch that.

Trying to build a defensive team.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
GrowingHorns
Rookie
Posts: 1,157
And1: 621
Joined: Sep 05, 2017

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#93 » by GrowingHorns » Thu Oct 30, 2025 8:53 pm

tester551 wrote:
NYG wrote:Jerami Grant, Scoot Henderson, Earlier of Bucks/Blazers 2030 Unprotected First Round Draft Pick and 2032 Blazers Unprotected First Round Draft Pick for Lauri Markkanen?

Overpaying


Not if he plays even close to this level next week's and months. You can't get him in that case w/o a package to this tier. But it's all about how his season progresses from now. Anyway, I think Jazz are after earlier picks that might become lottery picks.
Wolveswin
General Manager
Posts: 8,324
And1: 3,083
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#94 » by Wolveswin » Thu Oct 30, 2025 8:59 pm

Jojothewhale wrote:
Wolveswin wrote:Yes, a 76ers all-in trade means Embiid is ready/healthy to lead 76ers into playoffs - and adding Markkanen is additive to what is in place (including Embiid).


Then I still hate the value. I’m not sure that team is materially better and it cost them everything that isn’t nailed down, plus Grimes walking in free agency. That last bit is happening anyway, but they keep their picks without doing the deal.

No one is taking PG at any price close to palatable when he’s probably not as bad as he was last year post-quitting. Another team would be insane to take on the risk, so they have to ride it out for now.

PG isn’t a risk for a team tanking. He is additive. Tanking team is fine with him not playing.
Wolveswin
General Manager
Posts: 8,324
And1: 3,083
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#95 » by Wolveswin » Thu Oct 30, 2025 9:45 pm

Jojothewhale wrote:
Wolveswin wrote:Yes, a 76ers all-in trade means Embiid is ready/healthy to lead 76ers into playoffs - and adding Markkanen is additive to what is in place (including Embiid).


Then I still hate the value. I’m not sure that team is materially better and it cost them everything that isn’t nailed down, plus Grimes walking in free agency. That last bit is happening anyway, but they keep their picks without doing the deal.

No one is taking PG at any price close to palatable when he’s probably not as bad as he was last year post-quitting. Another team would be insane to take on the risk, so they have to ride it out for now.

PG isn’t a risk for a team tanking. He is additive. Tanking team is fine with him not playing.
Jojothewhale
Senior
Posts: 504
And1: 346
Joined: Dec 20, 2011

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#96 » by Jojothewhale » Thu Oct 30, 2025 9:59 pm

Wolveswin wrote:PG isn’t a risk for a team tanking. He is additive. Tanking team is fine with him not playing.


I wish that were true as I'm a Sixers fan. Don't agree, but I'll play along. I like this deal even less.

So PG isn't a huge negative, but it still requires adding 3 1sts with no mention of protection and McCain to get a guy who wasn't particularly good last year and is now locked into a massive deal? I'm sympathetic to Jazz fans' claims that last year was not indicative of what Markkanen can be, but it still happened. You'd be insane to trade for him at full 2023-24 previous contract valuation.

Basically, I think you're centering a deal on two players in Lauri and PG who are the last guys either team involved should accept market rate for today. Both teams are better off betting on bouncebacks and going from there. Hopefully both do. The more good players in the league, the better off we all are.
Wolveswin
General Manager
Posts: 8,324
And1: 3,083
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#97 » by Wolveswin » Fri Oct 31, 2025 2:27 am

Jojothewhale wrote:
Wolveswin wrote:PG isn’t a risk for a team tanking. He is additive. Tanking team is fine with him not playing.


I wish that were true as I'm a Sixers fan. Don't agree, but I'll play along. I like this deal even less.

So PG isn't a huge negative, but it still requires adding 3 1sts with no mention of protection and McCain to get a guy who wasn't particularly good last year and is now locked into a massive deal? I'm sympathetic to Jazz fans' claims that last year was not indicative of what Markkanen can be, but it still happened. You'd be insane to trade for him at full 2023-24 previous contract valuation.

Basically, I think you're centering a deal on two players in Lauri and PG who are the last guys either team involved should accept market rate for today. Both teams are better off betting on bouncebacks and going from there. Hopefully both do. The more good players in the league, the better off we all are.

Ahhh 6ers fan thinking protections added to picks to turn George into Markkanen. That is sweet.
Daddy 801
General Manager
Posts: 8,657
And1: 3,081
Joined: May 14, 2013
 

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#98 » by Daddy 801 » Fri Oct 31, 2025 7:30 am

Wolveswin wrote:
Jojothewhale wrote:
Wolveswin wrote:Yes, a 76ers all-in trade means Embiid is ready/healthy to lead 76ers into playoffs - and adding Markkanen is additive to what is in place (including Embiid).


Then I still hate the value. I’m not sure that team is materially better and it cost them everything that isn’t nailed down, plus Grimes walking in free agency. That last bit is happening anyway, but they keep their picks without doing the deal.

No one is taking PG at any price close to palatable when he’s probably not as bad as he was last year post-quitting. Another team would be insane to take on the risk, so they have to ride it out for now.

PG isn’t a risk for a team tanking. He is additive. Tanking team is fine with him not playing.


Tanking team is fine with him not playing. Tanking team is not ok with taking his contract on without significant first round draft picks. Same goes for Embiid.
Wolveswin
General Manager
Posts: 8,324
And1: 3,083
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#99 » by Wolveswin » Fri Oct 31, 2025 9:39 am

Daddy 801 wrote:
Wolveswin wrote:
Jojothewhale wrote:
Then I still hate the value. I’m not sure that team is materially better and it cost them everything that isn’t nailed down, plus Grimes walking in free agency. That last bit is happening anyway, but they keep their picks without doing the deal.

No one is taking PG at any price close to palatable when he’s probably not as bad as he was last year post-quitting. Another team would be insane to take on the risk, so they have to ride it out for now.

PG isn’t a risk for a team tanking. He is additive. Tanking team is fine with him not playing.


Tanking team is fine with him not playing. Tanking team is not ok with taking his contract on without significant first round draft picks. Same goes for Embiid.

Yep. That is why 3x 1sts and McCain needed to turn PG into Markkanen.
User avatar
giannis and 1
Starter
Posts: 2,391
And1: 1,195
Joined: Jan 06, 2019
Location: Vancouver, BC
       

Re: The Lauri Markkanen trade situation 

Post#100 » by giannis and 1 » Fri Oct 31, 2025 11:03 am

Wolveswin wrote:
giannis and 1 wrote:
HadAnEffectHere wrote:
I mean, that's literally possible I guess, but man, that is not a good fit for the Bucks and those picks are a while away for the Jazz.

Hows that not a good fit for the Bucks? Giannis can play the 3 if needed.

Bucks can trade one future 1st. Portis/Kuzma/1st isn’t even positive value. No way - in the realm of being realistic - has Danny Ainge been sitting around waiting to trade Markkanen for a not even positive trade package.

Bucks can add first round swap in either 31 or 32 as well. Along with a decent cheap youngish rotation player like GTJ. A prospect like Markovic or Ajax can be added as well.
still learning the game

Matches Malone wrote:How did NBA fandom get to the point that it's more fun to thirst over players on other teams than to care more about your own team and players...

Return to Trades and Transactions