Loneshot wrote:I thought it was just me when I was watching the game. I can't blame Ja if the offensive scheme called for him to play like a role player rather than use his unique abilities in iso.
This is probably what Ja heard when coaches told him the O could use some more variety and passing and movement. You're right he's a unique ISO player. Electric when on. And you'd be right if coaching staff told him to be an ancillary after thought, wasting all that talent.
But given Ja's me-ness on and off the court, is the latter plausible? I think it's more likely coaching staff wants to use more of the talents of other players integrated into a more varied and deadly team game.
I even get Ja being put off by the message; it's an adjustment and a matter of pride when a team is moving from a Ja-centric to a more team oriented game. And we don't know how strongly or bluntly or in front of the whole team this was communicated.
If kid gloves are off in the messaging then it indicates to me coach has FO backing and perhaps it's a get on board or we pivot away from you situation. Either way, this is to the team's benefit.
But if Ja sits with the message, he can benefit, too. He has to show he can adjust, get teammates more involved, still get his but pick his spots, and grow his game so it's not so reliant on athleticism which is already facing injuries, he can rebuild his reputation and value.
Ja seems to take interactions he doesn't like as confrontations. Not everything is a **** fight. The passive aggressive **** on court followed by the repeated 'ask the coaches' in the post-game is an adversarial choice.
My sense with teams who have problematic stars is that they work to get talent around a star which short term makes for a better team. Long term it builds leverage for the team as it can then look to trade said star for assets that better fit with a current group.
Maybe the powers that be want to push him out and the only way he stays is if he can adjust. Even if Ja wants out it's to his benefit to at least put in some effort. It sounds like an FO that has had it with catering to and covering for a stubborn player whose juice isn't worth the squeeze.
No idea what JJJ is doing. He has his contract. Not sure I understand the context - is he also passive aggressive in not scoring and hitching his loyalty wagon to Ja, against the coaches, or is he not on board with the new O schemes or how it was communicated or what?