I think Wilt is as far back as we have to go for a proper comparison to Wemby.

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid


D.Brasco wrote:Not that they necessarily play the game the same way, but both have such physical advantages over their competition that you'd almost want to change the games rules just for them. Wilt, being a 7'1" super-athlete in the early 1960s, and Wembanyama, at 7'5" in today's league and having guard like skills, are both massive physical outliers compared to their competition.
I think Wilt is as far back as we have to go for a proper comparison to Wemby.
Doctor MJ wrote:D.Brasco wrote:Not that they necessarily play the game the same way, but both have such physical advantages over their competition that you'd almost want to change the games rules just for them. Wilt, being a 7'1" super-athlete in the early 1960s, and Wembanyama, at 7'5" in today's league and having guard like skills, are both massive physical outliers compared to their competition.
I think Wilt is as far back as we have to go for a proper comparison to Wemby.
So I can't not note that Wilt's impact wasn't the best of his own era, Russell's was.
To your question, that means it's really not that hard for Wemby to top Wilt's impact - it's not some impossible thing we've never seen before or since - and so long as Wemby stays healthy, it's probably more a question of when Wemby tops Wilt's impact rather if.
And the answer to When? may be "Now", but I'll let the season play out longer before making that assertion.

D.Brasco wrote:Doctor MJ wrote:D.Brasco wrote:Not that they necessarily play the game the same way, but both have such physical advantages over their competition that you'd almost want to change the games rules just for them. Wilt, being a 7'1" super-athlete in the early 1960s, and Wembanyama, at 7'5" in today's league and having guard like skills, are both massive physical outliers compared to their competition.
I think Wilt is as far back as we have to go for a proper comparison to Wemby.
So I can't not note that Wilt's impact wasn't the best of his own era, Russell's was.
To your question, that means it's really not that hard for Wemby to top Wilt's impact - it's not some impossible thing we've never seen before or since - and so long as Wemby stays healthy, it's probably more a question of when Wemby tops Wilt's impact rather if.
And the answer to When? may be "Now", but I'll let the season play out longer before making that assertion.
I'm viewing things from the standpoint of individual impact. As good as Russell was, he was on some damn good teams. Wemby likewise, even if he wins the MVP and DPOY this year, is not winning a ring as his team is just not up to the level right now.
We've certainly seen physical outliers in this league's history but I think Wemby and Wilt are on their own tiers, at least with respect to the leagues they played in. I have to imagine a Wilt playing in 1960 was as much as an alien as Wemby in the 2025 NBA.

infinite11285 wrote:I strongly reject the claim that Wilt was a loser simply because he often lost to the guy with the better team.
Swap their rosters, and the results flip. Everyone loves to call basketball a “team sport,” but that truth conveniently disappears when it’s time to give credit—or assign blame.
KGtabake wrote:Unless someone in here is 80 years and older you can't possibly know the answer to this.
Someone who has actually watched Wilt play live can answer.
I have him as the GOAT big only by watching film.
That's not a way to know about his impact though.
D.Brasco wrote:KGtabake wrote:Unless someone in here is 80 years and older you can't possibly know the answer to this.
Someone who has actually watched Wilt play live can answer.
I have him as the GOAT big only by watching film.
That's not a way to know about his impact though.
Do you hold the same standard to discussing Michael Jordan? It's been almost 30 years since he has last played as a Bull and there has been an entire generation of NBA fans now who were not old enough to ever see him play live.
The Master wrote:To be honest, if we're already reaching with historical comparisons - he may be the first player since Bill Russell with that much transformational defensive impact.
Spurs: 1st DRTG (104.1)
Wemby on: 98.8 DRTG
Wemby off: 120.0 DRTG
Imagine if Wemby can lead Spurs on annual basis to -8/-10 rDRTG defenses.
D.Brasco wrote:Russells offensive game never had the volume and efficiency that Wemby has, and Wilt was a dominant deffensive force himself. It's a sad irony they only started officially counting blocks the literal year after he retired.
infinite11285 wrote:I strongly reject the claim that Wilt was a loser simply because he often lost to the guy with the better team.
Swap their rosters, and the results flip. Everyone loves to call basketball a “team sport,” but that truth conveniently disappears when it’s time to give credit—or assign blame.