Thaddy wrote:We should use RJ as the PG and move him off ball.
RJ gives us the biggest look. He can get his offense off too, unlike IQ.
Moderators: niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, Morris_Shatford, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, DG88
Thaddy wrote:We should use RJ as the PG and move him off ball.

Grew wrote:PushDaRock wrote:Grew wrote:
Yep and we got to see IQ run point a little bit last year. He came into this year knowing his role, he looks uncomfortable playing it. Even if he gets comfortable, he hasn't developed true PG skills. I was hoping he was one of those guys that just played other positions due to versatility, and having teammates ahead of him at PG. IQ wasn't even really a full time PG in college. So far in his opportunity as a starting PG, he seems just unsuited to the role, mentally, physically and skill set wise. I think we are seeing he was never a PG, the wiring isn't there. I hope he proves these posts to be premature.
How many teams have what you would consider a "True" PG as a starter?
You're thinking along the lines of an oldschool point guard who brings leadership and team direction. There is less of that in today's NBA for sure. IQ is definitely not that from what we have seen. The new school PG can break down a defense and create for themselves or others. IQ doesn't really fall into this category either from what we have seen. Most rosters in the NBA have at least one guy who falls into the latter category, even if his position is not the 1. We still lack this on our roster.
I was hoping BI would fill this role, but he's more of an ISO hooper who doesn't beat his man or break down the D, he just shoots over the top when he gets to his spot.
So I guess the better way of putting it would be. IQ is an offball guy. He's better suited to catch and shoot 3s, or attacking a closeout. Without the creator archetype on our roster, IQ is being tasked to be that guy, and he's failing. He's being tasked to be a bit of an old school point guard, but he doesn't bring leadership or point of attack defense, he just sets up a dry offense. Probably 20 teams start a guy at PG better suited than IQ to one of these roles.
I don't think Darko has figured out how to make the best of this roster yet. That's understandable. We shall see if IQ, Darko and this team as a whole can figure it out.
dballislife wrote:quick is clearly playing with 3 better offensive options right now and yet he pounds the ball and has it the most on the team for some reason
dballislife wrote:quick is clearly playing with 3 better offensive options right now and yet he pounds the ball and has it the most on the team for some reason
hyper316 wrote:dballislife wrote:quick is clearly playing with 3 better offensive options right now and yet he pounds the ball and has it the most on the team for some reason
IQ is a catch and shoot guy even from his Knicks days (Brunson pounded the ball). Yes he can pull up but those chances are less common on transitions
Part of that is simply taking more three-pointers, Rajaković said. Toronto wants Quickley taking as many as 10 threes per game and across the board, the Raptors need to get up more threes. The team can’t continue to rank 20th in the NBA in three-point attempts per game and that means getting more corner looks and more above-the-break threes, Rajaković told his team.
Thaddy wrote:dballislife wrote:quick is clearly playing with 3 better offensive options right now and yet he pounds the ball and has it the most on the team for some reason
It's definitely a coaching or execution issue. IQ was supposed to shoot ten threes a game but he's just dribbling around.
The solution should be use RJ and Ingram as point forwards. Use Barnes and Poeltl as screeners and run sets for IQ similar as we do for Gradey. Generate 3s, get doubles and pass out, just simple basketball.
I'd have the first sub as IQ and play him with the bench with Scottie. We should see what we have there in combo with Mamu a stretch big.
That second unit needs to be better. CMB is good but we need a wing player who can put the clamps on.

HiJiNX wrote:I’m not enjoying the IQ experience and even if he was shooting well I don’t think he’s a good fit. That said, Shead is not ready to start yet. He would get massacred. Let’s see him look consistently good coming off the bench before we entertain that discussion.
I’d love to bench him in favour of CMB or Ochai when Poeltl is healthy but then we lack ball handlers who can bring the ball up the floor. Maybe RJ, BI, and Barnes could share those duties? I don’t know. We need a strong ball handler on this team.
YogurtProducer wrote:Curious how in theory he isn’t a good fit?
Despite what people are spouting on here (which just screams groupthink at this point), he’s a solid defender at the 1, very good at protecting the ball, and a big plus shooting the ball (historically). In a lineup of RJ/BI/SB/JP, I’m curious what a “better fit” is if not a guy who fires a ton of 3’s
Mr.Raptorsingh wrote:Probably going to be Ja'Rome Morant