Randle McMurphy wrote:C Court wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:The Jays got the best player in the trade. The Jays chose the better catcher of the two. The Jays won the American League and had their best season in three decades due to their enormous contributions (they were #2 and #3 in WAR rate for the 2025 Jays).
In what world is any of that not an enormous win for the Jays?

Oh man, you got me there!
Varsho’s presence in the line-up is pretty much the only reason (or one of the primary reasons) the Jays won the American League and had their best season in decades. I'm sure we can prove your hypothesis by simply looking at how the Jays winning percentage dropped dramatically when Varsho was out of the line-up and how it significantly surged when Varsho was on the field.
Except, the facts are that the Blue Jays win percentage is virtually identical, with or without Varsho in the line-up.
Without Varsho - 52-39 - .571
With Varsho - 51-38 - .573
So Varsho didn't significantly change the Blue Jays win percentage when he was in the line-up. The Jays real win/loss record means more than your favorite fantasy WAR numbers

So your argument is that because the team also was good without Varsho that he wasn’t one of their most valuable players? What if Vlad or Springer just happened to hit better in the games he was missing? What if Hoffman had one of his good stretches where he wasn’t blowing games twice a week in that time (and he did, see April)? Does that get attributed to a lack of Varsho?
Feels like you could use a refresher course on basic logic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation Take a readthrough and come back with something that actually proves your point (which is apparently that Varsho wasn’t a very good or valuable player for the Jays while hitting 23 HR in 70+ games and playing elite CF defense with the 3rd best WAR rate on the team). Good luck.
See, you love to gaslight by telling me things I never said. Clever, but stupid.
I never said that Varsho wasn't a very good player. I said that the Jays' record was the same with and without Varsho. Now you dismiss that, because it doesn't support your hard-wired bias.
You conveniently overlook that I am referring to a large sample size which is evenly split - 91 games without Varsho and 89 games with Varsho - a total of 180 games. That is a large enough sample to account for various line-ups and the postive/negative impact of other players. Is is an exact measure? No, but it provides a reasonable measure of Varsho's impact on wins/losses.
You love to mention various forms of WAR. Yet, they are far from exact and are calculated with a combination of hard stats and human opinion. Everything has to be put into context. You have repeatedly called Varsho the Jays MVP, yet I don't believe many in MLB insiders would share that opinion.
https://medium.com/@michaelpeereboom04/why-you-shouldnt-trust-war-the-stat-18998a138efcNow is where we get to explaining what makes WAR a non-definitive stat. While I do truly believe it is an excellent stat for summarizing value, it should never be used as definitive proof for comparisons. There are two main issues with the stat, and we’ll begin with the most important one: Defense. Ever since the inception of the statistic, it has used DRS (Defensive Runs Saved) as the metric for grading defense. With DRS, the context is more important that the play itself.