rcklsscognition wrote:I’m curious to see some takes on rebuilding coaches vs winning coaches. Is it really a thing? If so, what do you think it is that makes a difference? Why can’t coaches go from rebuilding to winning? Or can they (examples?)
I wonder if early on in a rebuild you have young players who you can get to buy in to high effort/energy and as things progress, players age, become more selfish in their careers, and lose a bit of the team spirit so to speak. Maybe they tune out coaches, start to think they know better, maybe don’t give effort to things that don’t benefit themselves or that they don’t believe in as they’ve matured into a certain mindset of their game/the NBA as a whole.
I feel like as players age and mature in the NBA, they expect to do less work for more results, as in play smarter not harder, and that might require more high level thinking from the coaching staff to get buy in. Like we need to play intelligently not just hard every night. Seems like vet teams don’t play as hard but play smarter to make the game easier and maybe rebuilding coaches have a hard time making that transition for whatever reason.
Good established coaches rarely agree to lead a rebuild.
You also need to be lucky enough to coach great players . Than you can establish your position and choose better situations.
OKC Daigneault went from tank to champion. He had elite GM and luck to coach SGA at his first gig.
We never rewarded skill and smart play. Some players were rewarded for effort, some for being a high lottery pick and potential, some becouse we just couldnt find better alternative. You could argue only players who got rewarded for good/smart play are Franz and Mo Wagners. Now TDS could join this group