babyjax13 wrote:ProcessDoctor wrote:babyjax13 wrote:I would at least think about it, but I dont see Chicago trading for Embiid and including anything if value even if that first is, IMO, more likely to convey as 2nds.
Yea the 3rd team is the harder part. Embiid + LAC 1st for Lauri is so much cleaner. If any team can pump up his value more, it's Utah. They're in a similar spot as OKC was prior to SGA (think of their CP3 and Horford acquisitions).
I think George makes more sense for a lot of reasons. I think he is more likely to recover enough value to be tradeable but his contract is also shorter. Embiid is, IMO, by far the worst contract in the league. I would expect that LAC 1st at minimum just to send a bunch of bad players to match salary.
I agree 100%. Utah and maybe Brooklyn are the two best dump players for picks teams in the league and I wouldn’t even consider taking on Embiid unless it was two very good unprotected picks and another ok pick. 1 of them would have to be this year that is all but guaranteed to be a lottery pick.
For PG I would take two very good picks. 1 would have to convey this year and one could be a good pick but in the future like a 2030 or 2031 pick.
But if I was a sixers fan/GM I wouldn’t even bother sending picks. Just keep rolling with what you got. Because if you send out just one of Embiid and/or PG you are still stuck with the other. And Philly can’t realistically afford to send out 3-5 picks just to get off those guys. Just keep getting young guys and deal with the pain of those contracts and hope for the best! They have a good/great young core.


















