I don't think we know much about the Lakers yet.
What this team looks like, offensively, and defensively with their top 3 healthy, is pretty important. To me it's a question of: how great can this offense be, and can the defense get to solid? Luka/Lebron with this upgraded Austin Reaves has the potential for a #1 ranked offense in the league? The defense is a question mark still, as those 3 stars are all very slow, and it's going to be hard for them to consistently defend good offense with 3 players who can't really rotate off-ball.
JJ Redick is an excellent coach when it comes to operating with a skeleton crew. He comes up with functional schemes and gets player buy in, and can really maximize some player utility. He's getting a lot out of Ayton, Smart, and Laravia right now and leaning on what those guys do well.
kobe_vs_jordan wrote:Big reason they lost to the wolves is they had no center, lost rebounding battle and no bench scoring . Beat the wolves twice this year due to them adding ayton, smart and laravia.
Now does that trio plus a trade get them to okc status? I doubt it
Wolves have had a very cold, slow start to the season, so I don't think beating them is a big indicator for the Lakers.
The Lakers still profile as a very poor rebounding and rim protection team. They're a bottom 3 rebounding team, rank 24th in rim protection, 26th in block rate, and are generally allowing a lot of shots at the rim AND from 3.
Obviously, just having a big body like Ayton would have made a huge difference in last years series. It felt like the Lakers had to choose between keeping Gobert off the boards and playing real defense against everyone else. Even more importantly though, Luka was clearly not healthy in that series, so the Lakers couldn't really hit back on offense.