Mr Peanut wrote:The Duren detractors on the board have been awfully quiet recently. He has his flaws like any player but there's no denying his importance to our winning team currently.
Dude, it's tunnel vision on these boards. People expect guys to be flawless by 20 years old. Duren is 21 for crying out loud. The fact that people don't understand that players can learn and develop and put in work is insane. I mean how many examples do we need?
"Cade isn't a fit at PG and isn't worth the max" - Flash forward a year later and we're chanting MVP and he's one of the top 3 assist guys in the league.
"Holland was such a redundant, reach of a pick." Less than a season later "HOLLAND GOT THAT DAWG IN HIM!!!"
"Duren is a dime a dozen player, we should trade him, and I'm weary of extending him" ... "Duren is a big part of this team's future!"
It's why I'm so tired of the Ivey hate. Why? Why have we given up on a guy at 23 who shows flashes and already showed improvement last year. I'm not even saying he's going to be great, but why can't we at least hope he is good and see how things pan out instead of actively rooting against the guy? Thank goodness none of y'all are the Pistons' management or you would have traded away our core for some late first round picks or aging vets.
I know we've all been burned by the Killian Hayes's of the world, but at least our young guys show potential. Killian never ever showed that, despite given every opportunity. I get that people want to win, and yes we can easily get better TODAY by trading Duren/Ivey/Ausar/Holland for a proven player. But big picture, if we can continue to develop those guys, who have all in some way shown a high ceiling, I mean we're talking about potentially having a core that's deadly for 5+ years, even if 1-2 of them don't pan out or are bench guys. Thankfully I think Pistons' ownership sees that bigger picture.
Cade 24
Stew 24
Ivey 23
Ausar 22
Duren 21
Ron 20
The future is bright. Trust the process.