ImageImageImageImageImage

Alex Sarr

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,801
And1: 10,428
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1281 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Nov 7, 2025 1:21 am

willbcocks wrote:
AFM wrote:This comes as no surprise for those of us that put faith in the Bordeaux Beast.


I've been a believer in Sarr, but frankly I'm surprised; what he is showing now is close to the max of what I thought was possible, and I definitely didn't expect it this year.

It's crazy because he's doing this despite total incompetence out of the PG position. Usually centers start showing out when they have a good point guard operating on the pick and roll.
Wemby hasn't looked as impressive with Harper out injured. They were killing it with their pick and roll.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 54,801
And1: 10,428
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1282 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Fri Nov 7, 2025 1:23 am

Frichuela wrote:
willbcocks wrote:
AFM wrote:This comes as no surprise for those of us that put faith in the Bordeaux Beast.


I've been a believer in Sarr, but frankly I'm surprised; what he is showing now is close to the max of what I thought was possible, and I definitely didn't expect it this year.

It's crazy because he's doing this despite total incompetence out of the PG position. Usually centers start showing out when they have a good point guard operating on the pick and roll.


Great point. Our PG situation this season is abysmal with CJ and Bub bricking shots and committing turnovers.
I said in the other thread I think it's time to try Riley at PG.
Tre Johnson is the future of the Wizards.
BearlyBallin
Starter
Posts: 2,321
And1: 1,020
Joined: Mar 27, 2017
     

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1283 » by BearlyBallin » Fri Nov 7, 2025 2:12 am

Read on Twitter
?s=46
Tsze-Kung asked, "Is there one word which may serve as a rule of practice for all one's life?"

The Master said, "Is not Reciprocity such a word? What you do not want done to yourself, do not do to others."
~ Confucius about 500 BC
Despy
Sophomore
Posts: 155
And1: 94
Joined: Jul 14, 2024

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1284 » by Despy » Fri Nov 7, 2025 7:20 am

Bill Simmons and House talk a lot about Sarr (and our horrible guards) in the latest podcast

I wasnt too worried about Sarrs early woes. I read somewhere that every star and superstar bascally always was an inefficient shooter their rookie season. Even the 0-15 game you could see he had a good shot mechanic and a bunch of post moves the ball just wasn't going in. There some holes still in his game like rebounding but he's almost certainly going to be the best big man in a wizards uniform in my lifetime.
9 and 20
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,738
And1: 1,278
Joined: Mar 28, 2021
 

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1285 » by 9 and 20 » Yesterday 1:52 pm

Sarr is not too far from 20-10-5. He might be there already if he had teammates who could box out or make shots off of his passes. He actually is already there going by per 36 numbers. Plus 3.5 stocks a game.

All of that plus he actually looks different on the court - much more willing to go at guys. Still shooting a few of those fadeaway jumpers but for the most part, he's gotten rid of the softness to his game that was so maddening last year.
Can't say I do. Who else gonna shoot?
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,443
And1: 22,852
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1286 » by nate33 » Yesterday 3:06 pm

9 and 20 wrote:Sarr is not too far from 20-10-5. He might be there already if he had teammates who could box out or make shots off of his passes. He actually is already there going by per 36 numbers. Plus 3.5 stocks a game.

All of that plus he actually looks different on the court - much more willing to go at guys. Still shooting a few of those fadeaway jumpers but for the most part, he's gotten rid of the softness to his game that was so maddening last year.

The guy is going to be real good. I think we all have lowered expectations of him because last year was so rough, but we shouldn't overlook that he was a very young rookie. Imagine if he waited a year to enter the draft and came into the league this year as a 20.2 year old rookie and posted these numbers. 24 points, 10 boards, 5 assist and 3.5 blocks per 36 minutes on a .606 TS% ? Are you serious? People would be talking about him possibly being the rival to Wemby!

I just can't get over my built-in Wizards pessimism though. We can't have nice things. I'm bracing for Sarr's production to collapse once he is scouted more intensely. But it could actually go the other way. He might just get better as his confidence grows and as he gets used to seeing more defensive schemes. And he might get better in pick-and-roll coverage, learning how to stop both the roll man and the ball handler at the same time.
AFM
RealGM
Posts: 12,566
And1: 8,794
Joined: May 25, 2012
   

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1287 » by AFM » Yesterday 3:24 pm

He also might look better playing on a competent team with an actual PG. Sarr is easily my favorite Wizard. What a beast.
dobrojim
RealGM
Posts: 16,945
And1: 4,120
Joined: Sep 16, 2004

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1288 » by dobrojim » Yesterday 3:36 pm

We could potentially be pretty good if we somehow got DP

DP
TJ
BC
KG
AS

could be a very good starting five by the time they're
all 23-24 yo. And I like Riley too.
A lot of what we call 'thought' is just mental activity

When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression

Those who are convinced of absurdities, can be convinced to commit atrocities
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,443
And1: 22,852
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1289 » by nate33 » Yesterday 3:46 pm

dobrojim wrote:We could potentially be pretty good if we somehow got DP

DP
TJ
BC
KG
AS

could be a very good starting five by the time they're
all 23-24 yo. And I like Riley too.

Certainly, that's the best case scenario. Add a scoring guard and a jumbo-sized center in free agency, like, say, Quentin Grimes and Mitchell Robinson, and then we would have a pretty good bench of:

Grimes
Riley
Kispert
Champagnie
Robinson
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 24,769
And1: 9,176
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1290 » by payitforward » Yesterday 4:05 pm

User avatar
J-Ves
Analyst
Posts: 3,066
And1: 1,297
Joined: May 16, 2012
 

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1291 » by J-Ves » Yesterday 4:49 pm

nate33 wrote:
9 and 20 wrote:Sarr is not too far from 20-10-5. He might be there already if he had teammates who could box out or make shots off of his passes. He actually is already there going by per 36 numbers. Plus 3.5 stocks a game.

All of that plus he actually looks different on the court - much more willing to go at guys. Still shooting a few of those fadeaway jumpers but for the most part, he's gotten rid of the softness to his game that was so maddening last year.

The guy is going to be real good. I think we all have lowered expectations of him because last year was so rough, but we shouldn't overlook that he was a very young rookie. Imagine if he waited a year to enter the draft and came into the league this year as a 20.2 year old rookie and posted these numbers. 24 points, 10 boards, 5 assist and 3.5 blocks per 36 minutes on a .606 TS% ? Are you serious? People would be talking about him possibly being the rival to Wemby!

I just can't get over my built-in Wizards pessimism though. We can't have nice things. I'm bracing for Sarr's production to collapse once he is scouted more intensely. But it could actually go the other way. He might just get better as his confidence grows and as he gets used to seeing more defensive schemes. And he might get better in pick-and-roll coverage, learning how to stop both the roll man and the ball handler at the same time.

We can have nice things but only 1 nice thing at a time
9 and 20
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,738
And1: 1,278
Joined: Mar 28, 2021
 

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1292 » by 9 and 20 » Yesterday 6:01 pm

J-Ves wrote:
nate33 wrote:
9 and 20 wrote:Sarr is not too far from 20-10-5. He might be there already if he had teammates who could box out or make shots off of his passes. He actually is already there going by per 36 numbers. Plus 3.5 stocks a game.

All of that plus he actually looks different on the court - much more willing to go at guys. Still shooting a few of those fadeaway jumpers but for the most part, he's gotten rid of the softness to his game that was so maddening last year.

The guy is going to be real good. I think we all have lowered expectations of him because last year was so rough, but we shouldn't overlook that he was a very young rookie. Imagine if he waited a year to enter the draft and came into the league this year as a 20.2 year old rookie and posted these numbers. 24 points, 10 boards, 5 assist and 3.5 blocks per 36 minutes on a .606 TS% ? Are you serious? People would be talking about him possibly being the rival to Wemby!

I just can't get over my built-in Wizards pessimism though. We can't have nice things. I'm bracing for Sarr's production to collapse once he is scouted more intensely. But it could actually go the other way. He might just get better as his confidence grows and as he gets used to seeing more defensive schemes. And he might get better in pick-and-roll coverage, learning how to stop both the roll man and the ball handler at the same time.

We can have nice things but only 1 nice thing at a time


And then the one nice thing will be traded for Ike Austin, Rod Strickland, or Mitch Richmond. Or maybe Gerald Wallace will fall on his knee.
Can't say I do. Who else gonna shoot?
FarBeyondDriven
Analyst
Posts: 3,396
And1: 2,623
Joined: Aug 11, 2021

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1293 » by FarBeyondDriven » Today 5:08 am

I've been on the Sarr hype train longer than anyone and even suggested Embiid lite as his far-fetched peak but mostly I've considered him a #2, #3 type like Mobley and I've thought that because he's Charmin soft with atrocious hands. You can't teach his size, length, athleticism and instincts but it's his lack of strength and horrible hands that betray him. He's improved and it will be a steady and gradual improvement so patience is needed however watching him get bumped and lose control of the ball, miss bunnies from 3 ft and be unable to secure rebounds because of his hands is so frustrating. I want more from him than Mobley 2.0 tbh but I don't think you can teach hands or improve them. It's kinda innate so chances of being better than Mobley aren't looking great but I think everyone should be ecstatic either way.

Return to Washington Wizards