ImageImageImageImageImage

Alex Sarr

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,623
And1: 4,521
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1301 » by closg00 » Yesterday 2:39 pm

As woeful Wizard fans we would probably be suicidal by now had we drafted Zach, although he is also showing signs of progression.
Read on Twitter
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 70,477
And1: 22,900
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1302 » by nate33 » Yesterday 3:21 pm

closg00 wrote:As woeful Wizard fans we would probably be suicidal by now had we drafted Zach, although he is also showing signs of progression.
Read on Twitter


That tweet is hyperbole. Risacher is too young to conclude he is a bust. Yeah, he's likely not a star either, but it is far from certain that he will pan out as bad as Anthony Bennett, Markelle Fultz or Andrea Bargnani.
User avatar
willbcocks
Analyst
Posts: 3,658
And1: 324
Joined: Mar 17, 2003
Location: Wall-E has come to save Washington!

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1303 » by willbcocks » Yesterday 5:29 pm

The thing with Risacher is he's just another guy. Like, he'll probably be a solid player, but is there any world in which he's a major difference maker on a team? When you're drafting #1 and Sarr is available, sure he has a higher bust potential, but he also has a higher potential to be a major difference maker due to elite physical abilities.

I kind of agree with the tweet--it's not like he's at bad as Bennett, Fultz or Bargnani, but at least they were interesting to talk about, or you could imagine how Fultz or Bargs would turn out to be amazing. Bennett, I mean he was so bad I think he's "relevant" just in terms of terribleness. Risacher--no one's going to care about him one way or another.
Zonkerbl
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 9,074
And1: 4,759
Joined: Mar 24, 2010
       

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1304 » by Zonkerbl » Yesterday 5:47 pm

A few months ago I eyeballed the top 3 picks from the draft for the last 20 years and friends, it is a crapshoot. At least 50% of all of these picks have flamed out due to being chronically injury prone. Your goal is to get a starter on a championship caliber team who is not constantly injured. That is actually *above average* production from those picks.
I've been taught all my life to value service to the weak and powerless.
User avatar
Kanyewest
RealGM
Posts: 10,471
And1: 2,774
Joined: Jul 05, 2004

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1305 » by Kanyewest » Yesterday 8:09 pm

willbcocks wrote:The thing with Risacher is he's just another guy. Like, he'll probably be a solid player, but is there any world in which he's a major difference maker on a team? When you're drafting #1 and Sarr is available, sure he has a higher bust potential, but he also has a higher potential to be a major difference maker due to elite physical abilities.

I kind of agree with the tweet--it's not like he's at bad as Bennett, Fultz or Bargnani, but at least they were interesting to talk about, or you could imagine how Fultz or Bargs would turn out to be amazing. Bennett, I mean he was so bad I think he's "relevant" just in terms of terribleness. Risacher--no one's going to care about him one way or another.


Reminder that Sarr didn't want to end up with the Hawks because of either their unwillingness to play the 4 or he didn't want to end up in Atlanta. (Or maybe Winger learned from the Clippers and gave Sarr some under the table money) :D
User avatar
willbcocks
Analyst
Posts: 3,658
And1: 324
Joined: Mar 17, 2003
Location: Wall-E has come to save Washington!

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1306 » by willbcocks » Yesterday 8:37 pm

Kanyewest wrote:
willbcocks wrote:The thing with Risacher is he's just another guy. Like, he'll probably be a solid player, but is there any world in which he's a major difference maker on a team? When you're drafting #1 and Sarr is available, sure he has a higher bust potential, but he also has a higher potential to be a major difference maker due to elite physical abilities.

I kind of agree with the tweet--it's not like he's at bad as Bennett, Fultz or Bargnani, but at least they were interesting to talk about, or you could imagine how Fultz or Bargs would turn out to be amazing. Bennett, I mean he was so bad I think he's "relevant" just in terms of terribleness. Risacher--no one's going to care about him one way or another.


Reminder that Sarr didn't want to end up with the Hawks because of either their unwillingness to play the 4 or he didn't want to end up in Atlanta. (Or maybe Winger learned from the Clippers and gave Sarr some under the table money) :D


How could I forget? The best prospect in the draft pushing to go to the wizards? That was like the best wizards moment in a decade.

But if I were the hawks, I still would have drafted him. Sarr is not a primadona, he would have reported.
GoneShammGone
Junior
Posts: 344
And1: 232
Joined: Nov 12, 2009

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1307 » by GoneShammGone » Yesterday 8:46 pm

Kanyewest wrote:
willbcocks wrote:The thing with Risacher is he's just another guy. Like, he'll probably be a solid player, but is there any world in which he's a major difference maker on a team? When you're drafting #1 and Sarr is available, sure he has a higher bust potential, but he also has a higher potential to be a major difference maker due to elite physical abilities.

I kind of agree with the tweet--it's not like he's at bad as Bennett, Fultz or Bargnani, but at least they were interesting to talk about, or you could imagine how Fultz or Bargs would turn out to be amazing. Bennett, I mean he was so bad I think he's "relevant" just in terms of terribleness. Risacher--no one's going to care about him one way or another.


Reminder that Sarr didn't want to end up with the Hawks because of either their unwillingness to play the 4 or he didn't want to end up in Atlanta. (Or maybe Winger learned from the Clippers and gave Sarr some under the table money) :D


Maybe Alex is getting 50 Million from some Ted-connected French wine comglomerate to crush grapes once a year?
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 24,623
And1: 4,521
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1308 » by closg00 » Yesterday 9:11 pm

willbcocks wrote:
Kanyewest wrote:
willbcocks wrote:The thing with Risacher is he's just another guy. Like, he'll probably be a solid player, but is there any world in which he's a major difference maker on a team? When you're drafting #1 and Sarr is available, sure he has a higher bust potential, but he also has a higher potential to be a major difference maker due to elite physical abilities.

I kind of agree with the tweet--it's not like he's at bad as Bennett, Fultz or Bargnani, but at least they were interesting to talk about, or you could imagine how Fultz or Bargs would turn out to be amazing. Bennett, I mean he was so bad I think he's "relevant" just in terms of terribleness. Risacher--no one's going to care about him one way or another.


Reminder that Sarr didn't want to end up with the Hawks because of either their unwillingness to play the 4 or he didn't want to end up in Atlanta. (Or maybe Winger learned from the Clippers and gave Sarr some under the table money) :D


How could I forget? The best prospect in the draft pushing to go to the wizards? That was like the best wizards moment in a decade.

But if I were the hawks, I still would have drafted him. Sarr is not a primadona, he would have reported.


...and Ace Bailey too :o , now, if we could just get the rebuild out of the starting position, there has been too-many efforts to find a type of wing, to the detriment of other positions/players that would have us further ahead in the rebuild IMO.
dcstanley
Starter
Posts: 2,371
And1: 1,534
Joined: Nov 20, 2017

Re: Alex Sarr 

Post#1309 » by dcstanley » Today 12:05 am

nate33 wrote:
closg00 wrote:As woeful Wizard fans we would probably be suicidal by now had we drafted Zach, although he is also showing signs of progression.
Read on Twitter


That tweet is hyperbole. Risacher is too young to conclude he is a bust. Yeah, he's likely not a star either, but it is far from certain that he will pan out as bad as Anthony Bennett, Markelle Fultz or Andrea Bargnani.

It's subjective, but he refers to Risacher as irrelevant, not a bust. Bennett is relevant because he's a bust of epic proportions.

Return to Washington Wizards