tsherkin wrote:The4thHorseman wrote:I wasn't going against anything you said, it was more of a FYI thing to pass along.
Fair enough!cupcakesnake wrote:
I think against a weak defense like Washington's, Detroit should have been able to generate more team offense. Robinson is a good movement shooter, Duren is an elite role man. Ron Holland averages 8 FGA this year and only took 4 shots last night.
The Pistons let their offense devolve into playing iso off the dribble, and that's a big part of why they were in a rock fight, relying immensely on offensive rebounding, against the 28th ranked defense in the NBA.
Cade chose to call his own number a LOT, and it was pretty stinky to watch.
Honestly, I think Detroit is sufficiently limited in terms of on-ball creation with so many guys missing that it was the right choice. You can only get so many spot-up jumpers and roll actions.
Ron Holland averages 8 FGA and took 4, sure, but Daniss Jenkins averages 5 and took 17.
Meantime, Duren took 10 (he averages 10.8), Green 11 (averages 5.5), Robinson 11 (averages 8.5). Lots of guys were above their averages. Chaz Lanier took 7 shots and he's averaged 8.7 mpg so far this season.
Cade wasn't cannibalizing other guys that much, there's just a limit on how often you can create ideal shots when you're surrounded by your bench and guys who don't create for themselves.
These are still NBA players who can do things. I'm not asking them all to become all-stars. I'm also not looking for ideal shots, but I can't get on board with how little they managed to create anything besides Cade pull ups off the dribble. There's no way Cade taking 45 (of 114) shots is the correct shot distribution. We've all seen worse lineups than what the Pistons put out last night.
I would expect guys to shoot over their average FGA when other guys are out. I was surprised to see one player absorb basically the entire sum of the FGA of the missing players.













