Offseason Acquisitions Thread (FUKU, BAVASI!)
-
Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
-
Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
Well, yeah. Most likely. But in theory it's not a risky prop to bring him in for a year.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
-
Sweezo
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,215
- And1: 36
- Joined: Aug 12, 2001
-
True . But I doubt that theory is the reason the M's are retaining him. I don't think they see him as a cheap option that is on the same footing as a spring training invite who has to prove his worth to the team, but rather a product they've already invested a lot in and will cling to in the off chance they may some return on their investment.
-
Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
-
BlackMamba
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 16,297
- And1: 81
- Joined: Jun 20, 2004
- Location: Cd. de M
-
-
PhilipNelsonFan
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 17,246
- And1: 6
- Joined: Oct 11, 2004
-
Ex-hippie
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,213
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 17, 2003
-
Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
I think most surprising is that it only took the Rangers a one-year $4MM commitment to sign him. Nice deal.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.