Image ImageImage Image

Are the Bulls back?

Moderators: HomoSapien, Ice Man, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , kulaz3000, fleet, DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, coldfish, Payt10

User avatar
Michael Jackson
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 29,802
And1: 11,821
Joined: Jun 15, 2001

Re: Are the Bulls back? 

Post#161 » by Michael Jackson » Thu Nov 13, 2025 3:29 pm

dougthonus wrote:
Michael Jackson wrote:That is kinda the feeling I have. The Detriot game last night was not awesome but as said it was more G Lerague shootout which doesn't really show either team. If we have Giddey and Coby going against that decimated squad and they look as awful I am really worried. As is, don't feel good but there is no panic. We all knew this patch was going to be tough even if healthy. So not entirely out of the norm. Good not great is exactly the ceiling of this team and I think they will return to that. I believe a 6-8 team is what they are granted that moistly still qualifies as playin team.


I do wonder if there is a bit of a book out against us which is that we simply can't defend the rim.



Without a doubt there is. We can see it and if coaching staffs can't they should be fired. Are we going to have a way to minimize it? Hopefully. The current squad doesn't have much to mitigate it.
MrSparkle
RealGM
Posts: 23,456
And1: 11,239
Joined: Jul 31, 2003
Location: chicago

Re: Are the Bulls back? 

Post#162 » by MrSparkle » Thu Nov 13, 2025 4:55 pm

Now that Vuc’s superstar juice wore off, unfortunately we’re just the most exploitable defense in the league so long Billy plays him.
Am2626
Analyst
Posts: 3,232
And1: 1,093
Joined: Jul 13, 2013

Re: Are the Bulls back? 

Post#163 » by Am2626 » Thu Nov 13, 2025 6:40 pm

ScrantonBulls wrote:I know it's early. But we just beat two up-and-coming playoff teams that's are expected to be better this year then last year. Matas looked great in the first game. Despite having a forgettable 2nd game, the Bulls beat the Magic pretty good. This team has some serious depth. Patrick "Tin Man" Williams appears to have found a heart this season.

Are we back?!


Yeah back to mediocrity.
ScrantonBulls
Veteran
Posts: 2,571
And1: 3,537
Joined: Nov 18, 2023
     

Re: Are the Bulls back? 

Post#164 » by ScrantonBulls » Thu Nov 13, 2025 9:54 pm

Michael Jackson wrote:
dougthonus wrote:
Michael Jackson wrote:That is kinda the feeling I have. The Detriot game last night was not awesome but as said it was more G Lerague shootout which doesn't really show either team. If we have Giddey and Coby going against that decimated squad and they look as awful I am really worried. As is, don't feel good but there is no panic. We all knew this patch was going to be tough even if healthy. So not entirely out of the norm. Good not great is exactly the ceiling of this team and I think they will return to that. I believe a 6-8 team is what they are granted that moistly still qualifies as playin team.


I do wonder if there is a bit of a book out against us which is that we simply can't defend the rim.



Without a doubt there is. We can see it and if coaching staffs can't they should be fired. Are we going to have a way to minimize it? Hopefully. The current squad doesn't have much to mitigate it.

Knowing AK, the Bulls will probably make a trade to help in that area.
bledredwine wrote:There were 3 times Jordan won and was considered the underdog

1989 Eastern Conference Finals against the Detroit Pistons, the 1991 NBA Finals against the Magic Johnson-led Los Angeles Lakers, and the 1995 Eastern Conference Finals against the NY Knicks
User avatar
PaKii94
RealGM
Posts: 10,802
And1: 6,812
Joined: Aug 22, 2013
     

Re: Are the Bulls back? 

Post#165 » by PaKii94 » Today 5:48 am

I should have seen through the Vuc mirage and the lack of a true wing
User avatar
GoBlue72391
RealGM
Posts: 11,195
And1: 7,351
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Are the Bulls back? 

Post#166 » by GoBlue72391 » Today 5:57 am

Chi town wrote:
Muzbar wrote:
Red Larrivee wrote:
There are instances of teams figuring it out in the second half of the season and carrying it over to the next season. Especially when you keep that group intact the year after.

There are also instances that show it was just a flash in the pan and it didn't really mean much.

I'm sure I'll be called a negative Nancy or pessimistic Pete, but I just don't think 2 games into the season anyone should be jumping the shark one way or another.

The Rockets have lost their first 2 games and their last 3 games of last season. Are they destined for the lottery?

All I'm saying is wait maybe 20 games before making such 'claims'.


If you watch the full games it gives a lot of context and nuance.

Rockets lost their PG and they will now struggle. They can’t shoot. At all.

Folks that are speaking high about where we are seem to be looking at the nuance.

Red is one of the best posters on this site for many years. He knows what’s up.

This is my favorite post in the thread. So goofy lol

Return to Chicago Bulls