ImageImageImageImageImage

jakobe & Dick were bad picks

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

Mark_83
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,842
And1: 3,883
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#181 » by Mark_83 » Fri Nov 14, 2025 5:54 am

As I said in another thread, I fully expect Alijah Martin to take Walter's spot at some point. If we can move one of Walter or Agbaji for a big man that rebounds and blocks shots our roster will have more balance.
User avatar
ill-Will03
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,415
And1: 2,050
Joined: Jun 03, 2014
       

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#182 » by ill-Will03 » Sat Nov 15, 2025 3:05 am

Is Kon already better than Gradey ?
Blazing_royale
General Manager
Posts: 9,657
And1: 2,738
Joined: Jul 03, 2006

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#183 » by Blazing_royale » Sat Nov 15, 2025 3:51 am

ill-Will03 wrote:Is Kon already better than Gradey ?


I was going to say. Kon was who we thought Gradey was going to be. Kon in less than 15 NBA games is already miles better than Gradey in his 3rd year. Wild man.
Image
Any Pokémon fans out there? Check out my Youtube channel jchucollection
Appostis
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,850
And1: 3,143
Joined: May 11, 2021
   

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#184 » by Appostis » Sat Nov 15, 2025 4:48 am

Blazing_royale wrote:
ill-Will03 wrote:Is Kon already better than Gradey ?


I was going to say. Kon was who we thought Gradey was going to be. Kon in less than 15 NBA games is already miles better than Gradey in his 3rd year. Wild man.



Sample size theater Or are we just forgetting the 3 months last year he was averaging 18 odd ppg?

Books not out on Kon. Once he's on the scouting report let's have a less hot take conversation vs under 1 month.
Got Nuffin
Rookie
Posts: 1,138
And1: 1,074
Joined: Apr 19, 2014
     

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#185 » by Got Nuffin » Sat Nov 15, 2025 4:56 am

I wouldn't be surprised if the coaches know that Battle is the better player already, but understand that Dick / Walter are being showcased for a mid-season trade. Everyone can see that we need some kind of consolidation at the position.

On the other hand, Dick is so young that I really wouldn't be surprised if he blows up on the offensive end at some stage - he does have the tools but no consistency. Possibly mid-season or next season..
Image
Appostis
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,850
And1: 3,143
Joined: May 11, 2021
   

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#186 » by Appostis » Sat Nov 15, 2025 4:59 am

Got Nuffin wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if the coaches know that Battle is the better player already, but understand that Dick / Walter are being showcased for a mid-season trade. Everyone can see that we need some kind of consolidation at the position.

On the other hand, Dick is so young that I really wouldn't be surprised if he blows up on the offensive end at some stage - he does have the tools but no consistency. Possibly mid-season or next season..


Battles a better shooter.. but does not have nearly the gravity or movement dick provides.
bballsparkin
RealGM
Posts: 11,948
And1: 8,455
Joined: Mar 03, 2009

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#187 » by bballsparkin » Sat Nov 15, 2025 5:17 am

ill-Will03 wrote:Is Kon already better than Gradey ?


Well, different level of prospects so... Number 13 is barely in the lottery.
User avatar
ill-Will03
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,415
And1: 2,050
Joined: Jun 03, 2014
       

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#188 » by ill-Will03 » Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:56 am

Appostis wrote:
Got Nuffin wrote:I wouldn't be surprised if the coaches know that Battle is the better player already, but understand that Dick / Walter are being showcased for a mid-season trade. Everyone can see that we need some kind of consolidation at the position.

On the other hand, Dick is so young that I really wouldn't be surprised if he blows up on the offensive end at some stage - he does have the tools but no consistency. Possibly mid-season or next season..


Battles a better shooter.. but does not have nearly the gravity or movement dick provides.


Idk about the gravity part. They seem to close out very hard on battle and he always gets players to bite on his pump fake. Plus he’s already a better defender than Gradey. For all that’s said about Gradeys movement shooting he doesn’t seem to make many of those shots lol
User avatar
ill-Will03
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,415
And1: 2,050
Joined: Jun 03, 2014
       

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#189 » by ill-Will03 » Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:57 am

bballsparkin wrote:
ill-Will03 wrote:Is Kon already better than Gradey ?


Well, different level of prospects so... Number 13 is barely in the lottery.



Ya that’s a fair point. Was just watching the Hornets game and came away really impressed with Kon. His game seems far more advanced. Pretty impressive considering he’s only 16 games into his career
User avatar
Clutch0z24
General Manager
Posts: 9,928
And1: 9,974
Joined: May 08, 2014
   

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#190 » by Clutch0z24 » Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:42 am



Can't put Dick and George in the same class anymore....George clears him by alot and was the better pick to be made....
Image
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,305
And1: 13,928
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#191 » by Los_29 » Mon Nov 17, 2025 11:12 am

Clutch0z24 wrote:

Can't put Dick and George in the same class anymore....George clears him by alot and was the better pick to be made....


Utah is one of the worst teams in the league and Keyonte is shooting 41% from the field and a dreadful 27% from three. That’s just bad offense. The team is also horrible when he’s on the floor.

It reminds me of the Whitmore debates. George and Whitmore are empty calories. No winning team is going to have Keyonte shouldering a big offensive load. The fact Utah wants to lose and in order to lose they feel that giving Keyonte the ball is the best way to do that says a lot.
User avatar
SFour
RealGM
Posts: 41,278
And1: 61,626
Joined: Apr 07, 2012
   

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#192 » by SFour » Mon Nov 17, 2025 1:31 pm

Blazing_royale wrote:
ill-Will03 wrote:Is Kon already better than Gradey ?


I was going to say. Kon was who we thought Gradey was going to be. Kon in less than 15 NBA games is already miles better than Gradey in his 3rd year. Wild man.


He was the 4th pick though....he's supposed to be better than Dick.

Amen Thompson was the 4th pick in Dick's draft

I still got a little bit of hope for Dick, there's a decent chance he could be a late bloomer. Right now he just gives off kid playing against grown men vibes. Eventually he won't be a kid anymore.
User avatar
Duffman100
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 48,276
And1: 73,014
Joined: Jun 27, 2002
   

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#193 » by Duffman100 » Mon Nov 17, 2025 2:07 pm

Clutch0z24 wrote:

Can't put Dick and George in the same class anymore....George clears him by alot and was the better pick to be made....


He went 10 of 27 from the field lol.

If you let Dick chuck up 27 shots, I'm sure he'd get 30 points too.
User avatar
Tacoma
Head Coach
Posts: 6,429
And1: 5,520
Joined: Dec 08, 2004

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#194 » by Tacoma » Mon Nov 17, 2025 3:07 pm

Los_29 wrote:
Clutch0z24 wrote:

Can't put Dick and George in the same class anymore....George clears him by alot and was the better pick to be made....


Utah is one of the worst teams in the league and Keyonte is shooting 41% from the field and a dreadful 27% from three. That’s just bad offense. The team is also horrible when he’s on the floor.

It reminds me of the Whitmore debates. George and Whitmore are empty calories. No winning team is going to have Keyonte shouldering a big offensive load. The fact Utah wants to lose and in order to lose they feel that giving Keyonte the ball is the best way to do that says a lot.


This is about Keyonte vs. Gradey, so if Keyonte is shooting 41.2% from the field then what does that say about Gradey who is supposed to be a great shooter but currently at 41.9%?

And this "playing for a bad team" reasoning seems to be used to support whichever agenda is being spouted. Last year it was Barnes was playing on a bad team to justify his bad performance. Now it's the same "playing on a bad team" reasoning is used to nullify Keyonte's good performance.

I'm still hopeful on Gradey, he's got a good head on his shoulders and you can tell he's trying to become better which I can see him do as this season progresses. But there's no need to attack on Keyonte to try to make Gradey's pick selection better. He's playing very well for a 16th pick.
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,305
And1: 13,928
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#195 » by Los_29 » Mon Nov 17, 2025 3:35 pm

Tacoma wrote:
Los_29 wrote:
Clutch0z24 wrote:

Can't put Dick and George in the same class anymore....George clears him by alot and was the better pick to be made....


Utah is one of the worst teams in the league and Keyonte is shooting 41% from the field and a dreadful 27% from three. That’s just bad offense. The team is also horrible when he’s on the floor.

It reminds me of the Whitmore debates. George and Whitmore are empty calories. No winning team is going to have Keyonte shouldering a big offensive load. The fact Utah wants to lose and in order to lose they feel that giving Keyonte the ball is the best way to do that says a lot.


This is about Keyonte vs. Gradey, so if Keyonte is shooting 41.2% from the field then what does that say about Gradey who is supposed to be a great shooter but currently at 41.9%?

And this "playing for a bad team" reasoning seems to be used to support whichever agenda is being spouted. Last year it was Barnes was playing on a bad team to justify his bad performance. Now it's the same "playing on a bad team" reasoning is used to nullify Keyonte's good performance.

I'm still hopeful on Gradey, he's got a good head on his shoulders and you can tell he's trying to become better which I can see him do as this season progresses. But there's no need to attack on Keyonte to try to make Gradey's pick selection better. He's playing very well for a 16th pick.


I didn’t even mention Gradey. I am strictly going by what I see and what the numbers show. Keyonte is a high volume, inefficient player. That kind of playing style is not conducive to winning. If Keyonte was on a winning team, he’d be buried on the bench.

I didn’t try to justify Scottie’s performance. He was bad last year and has failed to make any significant improvements in his career. Let’s hope he can keep up his great play this year.

In regards to Keyonte, I think we’ve all been around this game long enough to know what these numbers really mean. It means nothing.
Basketball_Jones
RealGM
Posts: 30,719
And1: 18,015
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
     

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#196 » by Basketball_Jones » Mon Nov 17, 2025 3:38 pm

Gradey is adjusting to a different role as he only really played well when he was 1-3 in the offensive pecking order. Now he’s like 4-5 option at best. Likely, I think another team will get the most out of him and not us someday. It will likely be a pretty bad team though where he can put up numbers.
2019 Eastern Conference All Stars

Derozan
Lowry
Ibaka
Valanciunas
Van Vleet
Delon Wright
Lebron
Embiid

There are only 2 teams in the league that rank in the top 6 in offensive and defensive efficiency: the Golden State Warriors and the Toronto Raptors.
brownbobcat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,869
And1: 3,811
Joined: Jun 09, 2006

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#197 » by brownbobcat » Mon Nov 17, 2025 4:04 pm

Los_29 wrote:I didn’t even mention Gradey. I am strictly going by what I see and what the numbers show. Keyonte is a high volume, inefficient player. That kind of playing style is not conducive to winning. If Keyonte was on a winning team, he’d be buried on the bench.

I didn’t try to justify Scottie’s performance. He was bad last year and has failed to make any significant improvements in his career. Let’s hope he can keep up his great play this year.

In regards to Keyonte, I think we’ve all been around this game long enough to know what these numbers really mean. It means nothing.

Ehh, it doesn't mean nothing. You don't put up those numbers and not at least show that you're capable of being a decent rotation player in this league.

Gradey hasn't quite shown that yet to the same degree and he'll never be a star, but there are some reasons for optimism. He hasn't even turned 22 yet, for starters. He's getting to the line more and has shown some capability in the mid-range. I do think the 3pt shot will continue to improve and defenders certainly aren't willing to leave him wide open.
Spates
Starter
Posts: 2,134
And1: 1,614
Joined: Oct 29, 2011
Location: everywhere you go

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#198 » by Spates » Mon Nov 17, 2025 4:04 pm

Los_29 wrote:
Tacoma wrote:
Los_29 wrote:
Utah is one of the worst teams in the league and Keyonte is shooting 41% from the field and a dreadful 27% from three. That’s just bad offense. The team is also horrible when he’s on the floor.

It reminds me of the Whitmore debates. George and Whitmore are empty calories. No winning team is going to have Keyonte shouldering a big offensive load. The fact Utah wants to lose and in order to lose they feel that giving Keyonte the ball is the best way to do that says a lot.


This is about Keyonte vs. Gradey, so if Keyonte is shooting 41.2% from the field then what does that say about Gradey who is supposed to be a great shooter but currently at 41.9%?

And this "playing for a bad team" reasoning seems to be used to support whichever agenda is being spouted. Last year it was Barnes was playing on a bad team to justify his bad performance. Now it's the same "playing on a bad team" reasoning is used to nullify Keyonte's good performance.

I'm still hopeful on Gradey, he's got a good head on his shoulders and you can tell he's trying to become better which I can see him do as this season progresses. But there's no need to attack on Keyonte to try to make Gradey's pick selection better. He's playing very well for a 16th pick.


I didn’t even mention Gradey. I am strictly going by what I see and what the numbers show. Keyonte is a high volume, inefficient player. That kind of playing style is not conducive to winning. If Keyonte was on a winning team, he’d be buried on the bench.

I didn’t try to justify Scottie’s performance. He was bad last year and has failed to make any significant improvements in his career. Let’s hope he can keep up his great play this year.

In regards to Keyonte, I think we’ve all been around this game long enough to know what these numbers really mean. It means nothing.

I get major chucker vibes from Keyonte. Unless his efficiency improves he'll be on a long list of inefficient volume scorers.

I'm more interested in Walter Clayton personally.
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,305
And1: 13,928
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#199 » by Los_29 » Mon Nov 17, 2025 4:04 pm

Basketball_Jones wrote:Gradey is adjusting to a different role as he only really played well when he was 1-3 in the offensive pecking order. Now he’s like 4-5 option at best. Likely, I think another team will get the most out of him and not us someday. It will likely be a pretty bad team though where he can put up numbers.


That would be awful for Gradey. If he can’t succeed in this environment then he most likely wont succeed anywhere else.
Basketball_Jones
RealGM
Posts: 30,719
And1: 18,015
Joined: Mar 09, 2004
     

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#200 » by Basketball_Jones » Mon Nov 17, 2025 4:12 pm

Los_29 wrote:
Basketball_Jones wrote:Gradey is adjusting to a different role as he only really played well when he was 1-3 in the offensive pecking order. Now he’s like 4-5 option at best. Likely, I think another team will get the most out of him and not us someday. It will likely be a pretty bad team though where he can put up numbers.


That would be awful for Gradey. If he can’t succeed in this environment then he most likely wont succeed anywhere else.


Yeah I think he probably works better as a higher usage guy. That’s not to say he can’t do well here but to reach his potential I think he has to be high in the pecking order which won’t really happen on a good team imo.
2019 Eastern Conference All Stars

Derozan
Lowry
Ibaka
Valanciunas
Van Vleet
Delon Wright
Lebron
Embiid

There are only 2 teams in the league that rank in the top 6 in offensive and defensive efficiency: the Golden State Warriors and the Toronto Raptors.

Return to Toronto Raptors