HumbleRen wrote:Jalen Duren scares me, Dwight Howard esque.
Easily the best player on that team. He's driving off the dribble to mix it up but he gets it dumped off to him down low it's a guaranteed bucket. When he Ds up ppl bounce off him.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
HumbleRen wrote:Jalen Duren scares me, Dwight Howard esque.
TheAlchemist23 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:Jalen Duren scares me, Dwight Howard esque.
Easily the best player on that team. He's driving off the dribble to mix it up but he gets it dumped off to him down low it's a guaranteed bucket. When he Ds up ppl bounce off him.
Landomar wrote:HumbleRen wrote:Jalen Duren scares me, Dwight Howard esque.
Yeah, Duren has improved a lot and is at another level this year. He's been one of the best centers in the NBA so far.
Son Goku 25 wrote:DreamTeam09 wrote:I'm convinced all these soft tissue injuries are because of whatever synthetic additives/supplements these guys are taking
What are these, mind sharing?

WuTang_CMB wrote:?s=20
HumbleRen wrote:
Yep. It’s hilarious when older folks say my guys were able to play 82 games a season back then. It’s like duh, people weren’t covering that much distance back then.
Read something last year that Gradey Dick was running an equivalent of a mini marathon every last year due to how much running he did on the court. Its why deeper teams having so much success over the last 3 years.
WuTang_CMB wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
Yep. It’s hilarious when older folks say my guys were able to play 82 games a season back then. It’s like duh, people weren’t covering that much distance back then.
Read something last year that Gradey Dick was running an equivalent of a mini marathon every last year due to how much running he did on the court. Its why deeper teams having so much success over the last 3 years.
Ive been saying this for a while. the pace is 1000x then what it was 20 years ago and even a crazy amount in the last 6-7 years alone.
Players cannot sustain playing at this level without getting injured. It's inevitable and all the data points to it
Something will need to change in the future for schedule

Psubs wrote:WuTang_CMB wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
Yep. It’s hilarious when older folks say my guys were able to play 82 games a season back then. It’s like duh, people weren’t covering that much distance back then.
Read something last year that Gradey Dick was running an equivalent of a mini marathon every last year due to how much running he did on the court. Its why deeper teams having so much success over the last 3 years.
Ive been saying this for a while. the pace is 1000x then what it was 20 years ago and even a crazy amount in the last 6-7 years alone.
Players cannot sustain playing at this level without getting injured. It's inevitable and all the data points to it
Something will need to change in the future for schedule
The Raptors seem ahead of the curve with the depth and running hard with less minutes for the starters. Not quite hockey lines but we are physically running teams ragged.
Psubs wrote:WuTang_CMB wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
Yep. It’s hilarious when older folks say my guys were able to play 82 games a season back then. It’s like duh, people weren’t covering that much distance back then.
Read something last year that Gradey Dick was running an equivalent of a mini marathon every last year due to how much running he did on the court. Its why deeper teams having so much success over the last 3 years.
Ive been saying this for a while. the pace is 1000x then what it was 20 years ago and even a crazy amount in the last 6-7 years alone.
Players cannot sustain playing at this level without getting injured. It's inevitable and all the data points to it
Something will need to change in the future for schedule
The Raptors seem ahead of the curve with the depth and running hard with less minutes for the starters. Not quite hockey lines but we are physically running teams ragged.
WuTang_CMB wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
Yep. It’s hilarious when older folks say my guys were able to play 82 games a season back then. It’s like duh, people weren’t covering that much distance back then.
Read something last year that Gradey Dick was running an equivalent of a mini marathon every last year due to how much running he did on the court. Its why deeper teams having so much success over the last 3 years.
Ive been saying this for a while. the pace is 1000x then what it was 20 years ago and even a crazy amount in the last 6-7 years alone.
Players cannot sustain playing at this level without getting injured. It's inevitable and all the data points to it
Something will need to change in the future for schedule
HumbleRen wrote:WuTang_CMB wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
Yep. It’s hilarious when older folks say my guys were able to play 82 games a season back then. It’s like duh, people weren’t covering that much distance back then.
Read something last year that Gradey Dick was running an equivalent of a mini marathon every last year due to how much running he did on the court. Its why deeper teams having so much success over the last 3 years.
Ive been saying this for a while. the pace is 1000x then what it was 20 years ago and even a crazy amount in the last 6-7 years alone.
Players cannot sustain playing at this level without getting injured. It's inevitable and all the data points to it
Something will need to change in the future for schedule
I think they have to remove the corner 3. Artificially shrink up the court, no chance they make a shorter season, there’s too much money involved.
mdenny wrote:Knicks should do everything they can to convert Towns into AD. If they somehow manage to do that....they could win the chip.
Not Impossible. AD's stock has never been this low.
HumbleRen wrote:WuTang_CMB wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
Yep. It’s hilarious when older folks say my guys were able to play 82 games a season back then. It’s like duh, people weren’t covering that much distance back then.
Read something last year that Gradey Dick was running an equivalent of a mini marathon every last year due to how much running he did on the court. Its why deeper teams having so much success over the last 3 years.
Ive been saying this for a while. the pace is 1000x then what it was 20 years ago and even a crazy amount in the last 6-7 years alone.
Players cannot sustain playing at this level without getting injured. It's inevitable and all the data points to it
Something will need to change in the future for schedule
I think they have to remove the corner 3. Artificially shrink up the court, no chance they make a shorter season, there’s too much money involved.
WaltFrazier wrote:HumbleRen wrote:WuTang_CMB wrote:
Ive been saying this for a while. the pace is 1000x then what it was 20 years ago and even a crazy amount in the last 6-7 years alone.
Players cannot sustain playing at this level without getting injured. It's inevitable and all the data points to it
Something will need to change in the future for schedule
I think they have to remove the corner 3. Artificially shrink up the court, no chance they make a shorter season, there’s too much money involved.
Probably won't reduce to 72 games or whatever, true, although they should to eliminate back to backs. But Silver floated the idea of 40 minute games, 10 minute quarters, a year or so ago. Might be revisited sometime. Same # of games for revenue, TV would like it better for scheduling, and would reduce minutes. I know there'd be objections about tradition, and the effect on individual stats. I got used to 40 minute games watching the W this summer and kind of like the shorter format. And as Silver said every other level of hoops plays 40 minutes, WNBA, FIBA, NCAA.
HumbleRen wrote:WuTang_CMB wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
Yep. It’s hilarious when older folks say my guys were able to play 82 games a season back then. It’s like duh, people weren’t covering that much distance back then.
Read something last year that Gradey Dick was running an equivalent of a mini marathon every last year due to how much running he did on the court. Its why deeper teams having so much success over the last 3 years.
Ive been saying this for a while. the pace is 1000x then what it was 20 years ago and even a crazy amount in the last 6-7 years alone.
Players cannot sustain playing at this level without getting injured. It's inevitable and all the data points to it
Something will need to change in the future for schedule
I think they have to remove the corner 3. Artificially shrink up the court, no chance they make a shorter season, there’s too much money involved.
Zeno wrote:HumbleRen wrote:WuTang_CMB wrote:
Ive been saying this for a while. the pace is 1000x then what it was 20 years ago and even a crazy amount in the last 6-7 years alone.
Players cannot sustain playing at this level without getting injured. It's inevitable and all the data points to it
Something will need to change in the future for schedule
I think they have to remove the corner 3. Artificially shrink up the court, no chance they make a shorter season, there’s too much money involved.
There is one way to shorten the season but not eliminate games(or the money). Expand the rosters and create two seasons running concurrently. Basically dissolve the G league into the NBA. You can have a roster of around 22 and have an "nba elite" season of 60 games and another nba season of maybe 20-30 games ending in the nba cup happening some time in late Jan/early Feb. Players would be capped at playing no more than 65 games total between both levels. When a team goes to a city they would play a game at each level within 2 or 3 day period. Obviously pricing would reflect the difference in levels and only NBA elite games would be shown nationally. This way players would never play more than 3 games in a week. Anyway that's my rough idea.