ImageImageImageImageImage

jakobe & Dick were bad picks

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

User avatar
OakleyDokely
RealGM
Posts: 36,034
And1: 68,436
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: 416
 

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#221 » by OakleyDokely » Tue Nov 18, 2025 3:18 pm

Given the makeup of the team and the depth at the G position, the guys making their 3s and hitting open shots are going to play.
User avatar
ontnut
RealGM
Posts: 12,216
And1: 9,186
Joined: Jan 31, 2009
Location: Toronto
       

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#222 » by ontnut » Tue Nov 18, 2025 5:44 pm

Psubs wrote:
MiamiSPX wrote:Not giving up on JKW but he's been so bad that I am always hoping we can just survive his minutes.


It might take him a few years to develop physically and mentally but he has real tools. At least his 2nd contract should be small like 3 years $20 million.

He was, alongside Shead, one of the young guys I was highest on to make the leap this season.
JKW has been a disappointment, no doubt. But sophomore slumps are a thing. He might just need more reps on the G league to figure out whatever it is that is ailing him. His defence has improved since last year, so I don't think his woes are from lack of trying. Maybe his balance is off since he cut his hair lol.
Image
User avatar
dTox
RealGM
Posts: 16,293
And1: 17,501
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Location: Basement
   

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#223 » by dTox » Tue Nov 18, 2025 6:52 pm

With JaKobe, he may be running into the proverbial sophomore slump, I would not rip the cord on him until at least we see him perform in year 3 (unless of course, a terrific offer comes our way). With Gradey, he seems to have found a niche over the past 5-8 games, and has a decent chemistry with Scottie (esp in fast breaks), let's see if it holds and make a judgement call closer to the trade deadline?
Image
FREE PALESTINE
HangTime
Head Coach
Posts: 6,572
And1: 4,429
Joined: Oct 18, 2011

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#224 » by HangTime » Tue Nov 18, 2025 6:56 pm

ontnut wrote:
Psubs wrote:
MiamiSPX wrote:Not giving up on JKW but he's been so bad that I am always hoping we can just survive his minutes.


It might take him a few years to develop physically and mentally but he has real tools. At least his 2nd contract should be small like 3 years $20 million.

He was, alongside Shead, one of the young guys I was highest on to make the leap this season.
JKW has been a disappointment, no doubt. But sophomore slumps are a thing. He might just need more reps on the G league to figure out whatever it is that is ailing him. His defence has improved since last year, so I don't think his woes are from lack of trying. Maybe his balance is off since he cut his hair lol.


He's playing completely different from last season.
The added weight might have something to do with it.

I think he just needs a little more run way, without having to look over shoulder. With the Raptors, not the 905.
User avatar
Psubs
RealGM
Posts: 20,949
And1: 11,950
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Toronto

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#225 » by Psubs » Tue Nov 18, 2025 7:02 pm

He saw that we picked up Chucky and Martin and he's feeling the pressure to earn minutes.
Image
Tripod
RealGM
Posts: 13,286
And1: 12,762
Joined: Aug 13, 2021
 

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#226 » by Tripod » Yesterday 6:06 am

Jakobe needed this kind of game after stinkers all season. Hopefully it's something to build on.

Gradey once again won his minutes, something he has done 14/15 games. And his only loss was -2. Continues to lead the team in +/- by a large margin.

Gradey +102
Mamu +78
Battle +67 despite barely playing(77mins)
Barnes +59
Shead +44
IQ +42
Then big drop to Ochai at +16

Walter -26 and CMB -30 are the only negative guys who get regular minutes.
User avatar
Thaddy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,066
And1: 4,122
Joined: Dec 12, 2022

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#227 » by Thaddy » Yesterday 6:22 am

I can confidently say all of our first round picks the past few years will have 10+ NBA careers.

Dick can play hard and not make mistakes. He's in the right place at the right time, every time. The short bursts he comes in for are winning us games.

Walter has been unlucky. He has a tight handle, good defense but his shot wasn't falling until today. That's going to eventually go up, probably after today.

CMB is already NBA ready defensively. He's been played out of position due to a lack of 7 footers on our team. His best minutes are probably with Poeltl.

Agbaji is the only guy I don't believe in. I would look to trade him if there are teams looking to lock him up in free agency. A high 2nd round pick puts us at neutral net return.
User avatar
canz55
Starter
Posts: 2,268
And1: 2,355
Joined: Aug 13, 2020
       

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#228 » by canz55 » Yesterday 1:34 pm

Gradey has high enough intelligence to stay in the NBA long term. He had some terrible games to start this season that clouded my judgment I'll admit.

Also, Jakobe's defense on Maxi and co last night was very impressive and reminded us all that he's still a player in this league.
ImageWe the Champs...
User avatar
bluerap23
Head Coach
Posts: 7,235
And1: 7,371
Joined: Aug 15, 2012
   

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#229 » by bluerap23 » Yesterday 2:33 pm

Tripod wrote:Jakobe needed this kind of game after stinkers all season. Hopefully it's something to build on.

Gradey once again won his minutes, something he has done 14/15 games. And his only loss was -2. Continues to lead the team in +/- by a large margin.

Gradey +102
Mamu +78
Battle +67 despite barely playing(77mins)
Barnes +59
Shead +44
IQ +42
Then big drop to Ochai at +16

Walter -26 and CMB -30 are the only negative guys who get regular minutes.


That Gradey stat is crazy. Doesn't really line up with the eye test though. He is definitely playing his role very well. Efficiency improved and providing very good energy. Man-to-man defence is still suspect.
Image
User avatar
kwajo
Head Coach
Posts: 6,566
And1: 13,327
Joined: Apr 29, 2015
Location: Floating on the Bay of Fundy
     

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#230 » by kwajo » Yesterday 2:36 pm

bluerap23 wrote:
Tripod wrote:Jakobe needed this kind of game after stinkers all season. Hopefully it's something to build on.

Gradey once again won his minutes, something he has done 14/15 games. And his only loss was -2. Continues to lead the team in +/- by a large margin.

Gradey +102
Mamu +78
Battle +67 despite barely playing(77mins)
Barnes +59
Shead +44
IQ +42
Then big drop to Ochai at +16

Walter -26 and CMB -30 are the only negative guys who get regular minutes.


That Gradey stat is crazy. Doesn't really line up with the eye test though. He is definitely playing his role very well. Efficiency improved and providing very good energy. Man-to-man defence is still suspect.


There are likely other factors in his +/- such as the spacing he creates on the floor based on his reputation as a shooter and cutting/slashing tendencies.
"They left them homeless, down and out,
In their crumbling empire"
Tripod
RealGM
Posts: 13,286
And1: 12,762
Joined: Aug 13, 2021
 

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#231 » by Tripod » Yesterday 4:57 pm

Just saw an article that said going into last night's game, Gradey was:

8th in the league in net rating
6th in the league in defensive rating
Lowest turnover rate on Raps(4.7%)

Still need his 3pt shooting to improve but at least he is showing that when on the court, he isn't a black hole defensively anymore.
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,689
And1: 23,830
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#232 » by ATLTimekeeper » Yesterday 5:16 pm

kwajo wrote:
bluerap23 wrote:
Tripod wrote:Jakobe needed this kind of game after stinkers all season. Hopefully it's something to build on.

Gradey once again won his minutes, something he has done 14/15 games. And his only loss was -2. Continues to lead the team in +/- by a large margin.

Gradey +102
Mamu +78
Battle +67 despite barely playing(77mins)
Barnes +59
Shead +44
IQ +42
Then big drop to Ochai at +16

Walter -26 and CMB -30 are the only negative guys who get regular minutes.


That Gradey stat is crazy. Doesn't really line up with the eye test though. He is definitely playing his role very well. Efficiency improved and providing very good energy. Man-to-man defence is still suspect.


There are likely other factors in his +/- such as the spacing he creates on the floor based on his reputation as a shooter and cutting/slashing tendencies.


Yeah, I've made this point a few times but the Raptors get to have their cake and eat it with Gradey. He barely touches the ball but gets covered like the opposition really doesn't want him to get the ball. Our offense is really set up to satisfy the paid players into getting their points, and they've all been doing a very good job of taking advantage.

On defense he might get beat, but that's what your teammates are for. Unless you are absolutely necessary to keep an offense afloat and need to be out there for 35+ minutes, it's hard to really tank a defense with one player.
Tripod
RealGM
Posts: 13,286
And1: 12,762
Joined: Aug 13, 2021
 

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#233 » by Tripod » Yesterday 5:27 pm

Also, apparently Gradey is 4th in league scoring effeciency when coming off screens at 1.29pts/possession.

His movement helps the Raps a bunch!
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,689
And1: 23,830
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#234 » by ATLTimekeeper » Yesterday 5:40 pm

Personally I haven't complained about JaKobe or Gradey all year. They are crafting their game to fit what the team needs out of them. When you don't get regular touches you will always have trouble establishing a rhythm to help the game.

Deflections/36 JaKobe is at 6.5. I think his defense has been pretty consistently good. Eventually the fouls will come down. CMB and Walter are going to eventually have reputations as plus plus defenders in the league and get away with a lot of nonsense. They just have to take their lumps right now.
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 32,111
And1: 31,189
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#235 » by mademan » Yesterday 5:49 pm

Im still a believer in JKW. His activity is awesome and I think he'll be a highly valued POA defender. His shot needs to come around, but he's shooting with confidence and the coaching staff trusts it, which i imagine means there's reason to trust it.

Dick, to me, is just a swing and a miss. I'd be happy if he became a positive bench rotation player at this point.
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 32,111
And1: 31,189
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#236 » by mademan » Yesterday 5:50 pm

bluerap23 wrote:
Tripod wrote:Jakobe needed this kind of game after stinkers all season. Hopefully it's something to build on.

Gradey once again won his minutes, something he has done 14/15 games. And his only loss was -2. Continues to lead the team in +/- by a large margin.

Gradey +102
Mamu +78
Battle +67 despite barely playing(77mins)
Barnes +59
Shead +44
IQ +42
Then big drop to Ochai at +16

Walter -26 and CMB -30 are the only negative guys who get regular minutes.


That Gradey stat is crazy. Doesn't really line up with the eye test though. He is definitely playing his role very well. Efficiency improved and providing very good energy. Man-to-man defence is still suspect.


Naked +/- is the worst measurement in basketball. It's just full of noise
dballislife
RealGM
Posts: 14,878
And1: 5,891
Joined: Jan 24, 2010

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#237 » by dballislife » Yesterday 6:09 pm

i think both have chances to be legit bench help in nba but nothing more imo, and at their draft range getting solid bench help is good enough
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 15,221
And1: 11,404
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#238 » by PushDaRock » Yesterday 6:14 pm

mademan wrote:
bluerap23 wrote:
Tripod wrote:Jakobe needed this kind of game after stinkers all season. Hopefully it's something to build on.

Gradey once again won his minutes, something he has done 14/15 games. And his only loss was -2. Continues to lead the team in +/- by a large margin.

Gradey +102
Mamu +78
Battle +67 despite barely playing(77mins)
Barnes +59
Shead +44
IQ +42
Then big drop to Ochai at +16

Walter -26 and CMB -30 are the only negative guys who get regular minutes.


That Gradey stat is crazy. Doesn't really line up with the eye test though. He is definitely playing his role very well. Efficiency improved and providing very good energy. Man-to-man defence is still suspect.


Naked +/- is the worst measurement in basketball. It's just full of noise


Well, he has the best on/off splits of everyone as well outside of Battle.
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 32,111
And1: 31,189
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#239 » by mademan » Yesterday 6:59 pm

PushDaRock wrote:
mademan wrote:
bluerap23 wrote:
That Gradey stat is crazy. Doesn't really line up with the eye test though. He is definitely playing his role very well. Efficiency improved and providing very good energy. Man-to-man defence is still suspect.


Naked +/- is the worst measurement in basketball. It's just full of noise


Well, he has the best on/off splits of everyone as well outside of Battle.


Same thing. Low minute, bench role guys having good +/- or on/offs is different than a 32 min starter. This is 15 games at 16min/game...its genuinely meaningless.
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 15,221
And1: 11,404
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: jakobe & Dick were bad picks 

Post#240 » by PushDaRock » Yesterday 7:10 pm

mademan wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
mademan wrote:
Naked +/- is the worst measurement in basketball. It's just full of noise


Well, he has the best on/off splits of everyone as well outside of Battle.


Same thing. Low minute, bench role guys having good +/- or on/offs is different than a 32 min starter. This is 15 games at 16min/game...its genuinely meaningless.


Different? Sure, but not totally meaningless if he's even close to sustaining over the entire season. We do need a larger sample size.

Return to Toronto Raptors