3toheadmelo wrote:The KnicksFix wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:i dont think mikal is a bad player. he is having a solid year. but he absolutely was not worth that package we gave him. that was a package you give to someone like giannis. not a role player. that's my beef with him. if we didn't do that trade giannis would've been a knick already. if you're telling me you rather have mikal then giannis then idk what to tell you lol
hart has clearly lost his momentum playing under mike brown. never had this issue with him under thibs. so there's that. i dont mind moving him
i agree about kat he sucks
The trade for giannis wasn’t there at the time. But the trade for Mikal was. Who’s to say that giannis was ever going to be moved? We made the trade for Mikal and got within two wins of the finals.
The problem with the Knicks isn’t Mikal. Or OG. Or even Brunson.
It’s the defensive liabilities of KAT and hart and JB on the court at the same time.
the knicks have been waiting for giannis for years man. that's been well reported by shams. if they held on to their picks like they were doing for a long time then giannis would've been here.
what we gave up for mikal was a star package. that's not feasible.
and yeah we almost went to the finals last year. yet mikal still complained to dolan about thibs and got him fired. so yeah im blaming mikal lol
The rest of the league was waiting on giannis to become available. Were the Knicks supposed to sit and keep waiting? That’s like waiting on your high school crush to become available. But she finally likes you after she gets fat, has three kids and is divorced. The Knicks had to make moves. Mikal is not the problem. I’ll beat the dead horse. You cannot win with a lineup of JB KAT and Hart. Something has to give because Hart is giving up wayyyyy too many points night after night.
If you’re going to make moves those are the first two that have to go. If not , get JVG. But as constructed they aren’t enough.
























