ImageImageImageImageImage

Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga

Moderators: floppymoose, Sleepy51, Chris Porter's Hair

Twinkie defense
RealGM
Posts: 20,686
And1: 1,708
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4221 » by Twinkie defense » Fri Nov 21, 2025 10:49 pm

vvoland wrote:Yes, I agree, Post should play more w/ Steph/Dray/JK/JB. So should MM. Those should be the two people that play the most with those 4 players. Steve's mindset seems to be the compete opposite.

I would play Moody. I would play Post. I would play Post and Moody together. IDK why Kerr should try to jump through hoops to start Kuminga though.
AirP.
RealGM
Posts: 37,600
And1: 32,275
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4222 » by AirP. » Sat Nov 22, 2025 5:43 pm

Twinkie defense wrote:
vvoland wrote:Yes, I agree, Post should play more w/ Steph/Dray/JK/JB. So should MM. Those should be the two people that play the most with those 4 players. Steve's mindset seems to be the compete opposite.

I would play Moody. I would play Post. I would play Post and Moody together. IDK why Kerr should try to jump through hoops to start Kuminga though.

He's got the highest upside of the not top 3 paid players for this season for the Warriors if he plays the right way. I keep hoping his knee issues were part of the reason for his play falling off as we went deeper into the season. Just Kuminga's activity on rebounding would have helped greatly last night against Portland (not sure why Santos wasn't used last night to try to combat the 21 offensive rebounds Portland got).

I'm expecting Sacramento to start rebuilding this season, I wonder what trade assets (possibly none) with Kuminga(22.5 mil) it would take to acquire Monk (18.8 mil) and K.Ellis (2.3 mil) but that doesn't fix the front court issues, but that could help the defense and 3pt shot making, I'm very interested what Monk could do in the GS offense. For Sacramento it would get them off Monk's longer term money, not deal with possibly losing Ellis for nothing and jumpstart the rebuild with Kuminga as your tank commander.

Don't get me wrong, in the right trades I'm ok moving anyone not named Curry, Butler or Draymond (since the last 2 probably won't bring back much at their age, Curry is still a top player).

If possible, I'd do Podz for K.Ellis as long as there is an extension agreed upon when the trade happens that I believe GS could have him sign during the seasons.

For GS, you have to think later in this season. Right now, who do you think you rely on playing their roles come playoff time?
For me... it's Curry, Melton, Butler, Draymond and Horford.
Which leaves 3-5 more rotation spots... Moody, Kuminga, Podz, Post, Richard, Hield and GP2. Wouldn't mind Santos being in this group but Kerr doesn't seem to care about rebounders in the rotation.
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 30,140
And1: 8,140
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4223 » by Crazy-Canuck » Sun Nov 23, 2025 5:43 am

Slater hinted that the warriors were hoping kuminga would be that championship starting 3rd option lockdown wing defender. They will be looking for that at the trade deadline.

Warriors have their 1 in steph, their 2 in Jimmy. But they are badly missing that 3rd guy. Bontempt thinks there will be no suitor for kuminga at the deadline.
Ilovethebay
Pro Prospect
Posts: 817
And1: 204
Joined: Feb 08, 2012
     

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4224 » by Ilovethebay » Sun Nov 23, 2025 7:08 am

The whole Kuminga sucks but we can trade him for a difference maker is one of the strangest viewpoints I’ve seen on this board for as long as I have been reading it. Cognitive dissonance at its finest :crazy: :lol: I hope he reverts back to the player he was during the first 2 weeks of the season so the haters can kick rocks.
bay2hk
Rookie
Posts: 1,185
And1: 126
Joined: Jan 17, 2007

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4225 » by bay2hk » Mon Nov 24, 2025 2:39 am

This is what JK Stans asked for. To overpay for a low IQ bb player who is only good at running and dunking. With knee issues JK is basically useless.

Warriors should have just forced him to sign the QO as he’s not worth much in the trade market. Ship him for Vuc as soon as the trade restriction lifts. We can use another shooting big with Horford not able to play b2b.
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 30,140
And1: 8,140
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4226 » by Crazy-Canuck » Mon Nov 24, 2025 4:14 am

Ilovethebay wrote:The whole Kuminga sucks but we can trade him for a difference maker is one of the strangest viewpoints I’ve seen on this board for as long as I have been reading it. Cognitive dissonance at its finest :crazy: :lol: I hope he reverts back to the player he was during the first 2 weeks of the season so the haters can kick rocks.


Kuminga doesnt suck as a player, he just sucks in the role that the Warriors want him to be. There's a difference.
Ilovethebay
Pro Prospect
Posts: 817
And1: 204
Joined: Feb 08, 2012
     

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4227 » by Ilovethebay » Mon Nov 24, 2025 5:29 am

bay2hk wrote:This is what JK Stans asked for. To overpay for a low IQ bb player who is only good at running and dunking. With knee issues JK is basically useless.

Warriors should have just forced him to sign the QO as he’s not worth much in the trade market. Ship him for Vuc as soon as the trade restriction lifts. We can use another shooting big with Horford not able to play b2b.


No one asked for this. I was hoping they would have forced him to sign the QO. At any rate, the three straight loses while he is out shows he is not the scapegoat :lol: .
Ilovethebay
Pro Prospect
Posts: 817
And1: 204
Joined: Feb 08, 2012
     

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4228 » by Ilovethebay » Mon Nov 24, 2025 5:33 am

Crazy-Canuck wrote:
Ilovethebay wrote:The whole Kuminga sucks but we can trade him for a difference maker is one of the strangest viewpoints I’ve seen on this board for as long as I have been reading it. Cognitive dissonance at its finest :crazy: :lol: I hope he reverts back to the player he was during the first 2 weeks of the season so the haters can kick rocks.


Kuminga doesnt suck as a player, he just sucks in the role that the Warriors want him to be. There's a difference.


Not to most people. I could be wrong, but you seem to be one of his worst critics. I guess the last 3 games show this isn’t an addition by subtraction situation.
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 30,140
And1: 8,140
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4229 » by Crazy-Canuck » Mon Nov 24, 2025 6:11 am

Ilovethebay wrote:
Crazy-Canuck wrote:
Ilovethebay wrote:The whole Kuminga sucks but we can trade him for a difference maker is one of the strangest viewpoints I’ve seen on this board for as long as I have been reading it. Cognitive dissonance at its finest :crazy: :lol: I hope he reverts back to the player he was during the first 2 weeks of the season so the haters can kick rocks.


Kuminga doesnt suck as a player, he just sucks in the role that the Warriors want him to be. There's a difference.


Not to most people. I could be wrong, but you seem to be one of his worst critics. I guess the last 3 games show this isn’t an addition by subtraction situation.


I've been the same from the start on jk. He isn't a wing. He's an iso face 4. He absolutely can't play in a read and react system. It's always about playing with kuminga rather than kuminga playing with the team.

People want him to be a 2 way wing, yet he's never consistently showed that potential. I alao think his athleticism is overrated because it isn't functional just like lavine. His hip to feet coordination is sub par for a wing.

Im all about trading him to get a better fit between steph and dray. Unlike some, I'm not in the kuminga is our savior train.

He might be a good player, but he absolutely is a horrible for for what they need from him.

Kuminga fans cant see the difference for the most part.
SpreeS
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,818
And1: 4,168
Joined: Jul 26, 2012
 

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4230 » by SpreeS » Mon Nov 24, 2025 11:44 am

Crazy-Canuck wrote:
Ilovethebay wrote:
Crazy-Canuck wrote:
Kuminga doesnt suck as a player, he just sucks in the role that the Warriors want him to be. There's a difference.


Not to most people. I could be wrong, but you seem to be one of his worst critics. I guess the last 3 games show this isn’t an addition by subtraction situation.


I've been the same from the start on jk. He isn't a wing. He's an iso face 4. He absolutely can't play in a read and react system. It's always about playing with kuminga rather than kuminga playing with the team.

People want him to be a 2 way wing, yet he's never consistently showed that potential. I alao think his athleticism is overrated because it isn't functional just like lavine. His hip to feet coordination is sub par for a wing.

Im all about trading him to get a better fit between steph and dray. Unlike some, I'm not in the kuminga is our savior train.

He might be a good player, but he absolutely is a horrible for for what they need from him.

Kuminga fans cant see the difference for the most part.


Do you think we don't see that Kerr apart his system dont give a sh..t? You can give him whatever you want, he still would play his system. Look at USA NT in OG and WC. Only Curry saved his ass from disaster two years in a row.

I dont say that Kerr system is something bad, no its elite system for right players. But he must see what kind of players will fit in it, before drafting or signing or trading for new players. He must be focal voice in this departmant. Because he will never adapt to players strengths if they are not Curry/Green.
User avatar
whatisacenter
RealGM
Posts: 13,432
And1: 15,570
Joined: Aug 05, 2013
 

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4231 » by whatisacenter » Mon Nov 24, 2025 4:28 pm

bay2hk wrote:This is what JK Stans asked for. To overpay for a low IQ bb player who is only good at running and dunking. With knee issues JK is basically useless.

Warriors should have just forced him to sign the QO as he’s not worth much in the trade market. Ship him for Vuc as soon as the trade restriction lifts. We can use another shooting big with Horford not able to play b2b.


LOL at him having Stans...there are like 3 or 4 poster here that don't crap on him every game and fixate on every mistake he makes.

By the way, this is not what I wanted, I was hoping he would get traded in the offseason. I'm so tired of posts like yours.
Madvillain been as high as Kathmandu
And tilted to the side like that fat man's shoe
Twinkie defense
RealGM
Posts: 20,686
And1: 1,708
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4232 » by Twinkie defense » Mon Nov 24, 2025 7:17 pm

Ilovethebay wrote:The whole Kuminga sucks but we can trade him for a difference maker is one of the strangest viewpoints I’ve seen on this board for as long as I have been reading it. Cognitive dissonance at its finest :crazy: :lol:

You're forgetting that a short-term, $22.5 mil salary slot is the perfect vehicle to attach other assets to. Think of Kuminga as plain tofu, and a pick or young, cheap player as a nice Szechuan sauce.
bay2hk
Rookie
Posts: 1,185
And1: 126
Joined: Jan 17, 2007

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4233 » by bay2hk » Mon Nov 24, 2025 7:59 pm

whatisacenter wrote:
bay2hk wrote:This is what JK Stans asked for. To overpay for a low IQ bb player who is only good at running and dunking. With knee issues JK is basically useless.

Warriors should have just forced him to sign the QO as he’s not worth much in the trade market. Ship him for Vuc as soon as the trade restriction lifts. We can use another shooting big with Horford not able to play b2b.


LOL at him having Stans...there are like 3 or 4 poster here that don't crap on him every game and fixate on every mistake he makes.

By the way, this is not what I wanted, I was hoping he would get traded in the offseason. I'm so tired of posts like yours.


Yup, and you’re one of those annoying Stans that can’t accept JK sucks. Get over it dude. He’s trash and will be out of the league in a few years.
AirP.
RealGM
Posts: 37,600
And1: 32,275
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4234 » by AirP. » Mon Nov 24, 2025 8:06 pm

Twinkie defense wrote:
Ilovethebay wrote:The whole Kuminga sucks but we can trade him for a difference maker is one of the strangest viewpoints I’ve seen on this board for as long as I have been reading it. Cognitive dissonance at its finest :crazy: :lol:

You're forgetting that a short-term, $22.5 mil salary slot is the perfect vehicle to attach other assets to. Think of Kuminga as plain tofu, and a pick or young, cheap player as a nice Szechuan sauce.


Some possible examples, a team (Kings) wanting to move off a contract with future money and seeing what Kuminga could do for them (they could extend him, not pick up his option or could look at him for another season) ...
DeRozan and Ellis for Kuminga and Hield.
Monk and Ellis for Kuminga.
DAWill1128
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,709
And1: 1,983
Joined: Jun 17, 2004
   

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4235 » by DAWill1128 » Mon Nov 24, 2025 8:59 pm

Would anyone move Kuminga for Monk?
User avatar
Onus
RealGM
Posts: 23,881
And1: 7,176
Joined: May 12, 2008
Location: NOA

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4236 » by Onus » Mon Nov 24, 2025 11:10 pm

Ngl I seriously thought jk was injured, but everyone is now thinking he’s just holding out because he got benched and is just waiting to be traded.
Most 4th Quarter Points in Final since 1991
1995 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5
2000 Shaquille O'Neal 11.5 (61.1% TS)
2015 Stephen Curry 10.8 (75.1% TS)
1997 Michael Jordan 10.7 (55.1% TS)
1998 Michael Jordan 10.6 (50.6% TS)
2011 Dirk Nowitzki 10.3 (68.0% TS)
User avatar
whatisacenter
RealGM
Posts: 13,432
And1: 15,570
Joined: Aug 05, 2013
 

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4237 » by whatisacenter » Mon Nov 24, 2025 11:22 pm

Onus wrote:Ngl I seriously thought jk was injured, but everyone is now thinking he’s just holding out because he got benched and is just waiting to be traded.


Yeah, Kerr’s tone and tenor about JK yesterday and the report that JK was feeling like a scapegoat again after the OKC game is making things look a little murky.
Madvillain been as high as Kathmandu
And tilted to the side like that fat man's shoe
Crazy-Canuck
RealGM
Posts: 30,140
And1: 8,140
Joined: Nov 24, 2003

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4238 » by Crazy-Canuck » Yesterday 12:15 am

Onus wrote:Ngl I seriously thought jk was injured, but everyone is now thinking he’s just holding out because he got benched and is just waiting to be traded.


Yeah, i can't believe that would be true. Thats career suicide.
HiRez
RealGM
Posts: 15,043
And1: 4,122
Joined: Dec 29, 2011

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4239 » by HiRez » Yesterday 12:24 am

Crazy-Canuck wrote:
Onus wrote:Ngl I seriously thought jk was injured, but everyone is now thinking he’s just holding out because he got benched and is just waiting to be traded.

Yeah, i can't believe that would be true. Thats career suicide.

I don't think so either, it would give him even less leverage for a trade and for afterwards when he wants to sign a new contract. And the timing isn't right, if this were the case maybe you'd do it a couple weeks before the trade window opens, but even then it'd be more destructive than helpful.
User avatar
whatisacenter
RealGM
Posts: 13,432
And1: 15,570
Joined: Aug 05, 2013
 

Re: Warriors exploring S&T for Kuminga 

Post#4240 » by whatisacenter » Yesterday 1:03 am

HiRez wrote:
Crazy-Canuck wrote:
Onus wrote:Ngl I seriously thought jk was injured, but everyone is now thinking he’s just holding out because he got benched and is just waiting to be traded.

Yeah, i can't believe that would be true. Thats career suicide.

I don't think so either, it would give him even less leverage for a trade and for afterwards when he wants to sign a new contract. And the timing isn't right, if this were the case maybe you'd do it a couple weeks before the trade window opens, but even then it'd be more destructive than helpful.


I agree that it would be an extreme move by JK but what do you make of Kerr's comments?
Madvillain been as high as Kathmandu
And tilted to the side like that fat man's shoe

Return to Golden State Warriors