Bob8 wrote:Mr B wrote:Super Cooper wrote:
Agreed, and the nuances could be because English isn't your first language. I'm totally respectful of that.
So, for all who think DLive is a "go-forward" centerpiece, you're being silly. DLive has shed at least 10% of minutes played every year since college. IMO, you trade him ASAP while he has ANY value. Pairing him with Klay or Caleb could return a quality more dependable player.
I will say that Gafford/Cisse will play a ton more minutes than Lively/Gafford. Maybe trading Lively is the better option.
Trading Lively for who? His trading value is extremely low at the moment and his contract is only 5 mio, so you will need to add someone like Klay, who is probably negative asset. You're not getting anything good back for sure. He's still very young, so it has much more sense to wait and hope he becomes healthier.
Why are you so stuck on DLive’s contract only being $5m??? Of course he’d be packaged with at least one big contract. Dude, look at the history of every big trade in the last 10 years. It’s rare if it doesn’t include players on their rookie contract on their rookie contract.












