YogurtProducer wrote:Tripod wrote:pingpongrac wrote:
Can YOU be honest? Two of those games were low-volume shooting nights (4 attempts against the Celtics and 4 attempts against the Bucks) and two were pretty average (3/9 against the Heat and 3/10 against the Nets) while the 1/7 and 1/8 games were rough.
It is absolutely wild to me that in 2025 we still have people losing their minds over a two-week stretch where a three-point shooter goes cold. It happens multiple times every single year to just about every single shooter in the league and it is always balanced out by a separate stretch where the guy shoots ~50% over 5ish games.
So it's not ok to complain when your best 3pt shooter shoots 19% over a 2 week period?
Ok
You can complain, but there’s a difference between acknowledging the sample sample nature and people going “he’s been horrible! He sucks! Blah blah blah”
There’s a difference between stupid play and bad results and smart play and just missing shots. I’m not really a fan of people overreacting every time a good shooter has a few game stretch of bad shooting. It’s a lot different then when guys hijack offensive possessions
Agreed. That's why in another post I made sure to clarify that I am not a "get IQ off the team" guy when he goes cold. We need his shooting. His assists to TO ratio is great too.
I have said also that him losing Yak and Yak's good screening really hurts him as it helps him get separation.
IQ is not trash. He just had a 6 game stretch where the results were garbage....lol.




























