nivisi9 wrote:Honestly when we reverse back to that pivotal timeframe prior to us trading for Poeltl, and before setting this horrible current treadmill trajectory we are now living..
- At the time we were 5th worse in the league (the draft slot which eventually won Wemby).
...
- 7. Basically 2025 becomes only "tank season" to acquire elite prospects as decision to trade for Ingram essentially signals end of rebuild (terrible team building decision). I see this as one of the low key worst decisions that was made.
It was as if management was tired of losing but also not taking responsibility for the reality of trading their lottery pick in 2024. If that's the reality you created you take responsibility for it and continue to rebuild properly. The correct decision would've been to remain in pure rebuild mode until we acquired a collection of elite /high value prospects. (massive fail).
- 8. accumulation of 2024 lower value prospects/picks now looks like it was some form of prospect compensation dump for trading
2024 top 10 draft pick. Most of these prospects havent even shown bench player ability/nba rotation player - Walter, Mogbo, Shead, Chomche. HUGE FAIL.
- 9. Mentioned Ingram trade basically ended rebuild which included trading Indiana 1st (basically only pick of value from Siakam trade). This pick will most likely now convey as attractive 2026 lottery pick in deep draft -- another missed opportunity to add young elite talent/prospect.
..
Can anyone identify the silver lining in all of this?
First round canon fodder is a step on the rebuild- and that is where we are.
I do not think ownership can stomach the required rebuild- Ownership wants immediate and instant profit right away- Note the 30 years of the Blue Jays sucking with no future- that is an ownership group that needs, urgently and immediately, the maximum possible return, NOW NOW NOW! The BIGGEST FATTEST RETURN - this means no sucking today to win tomorrow- OR a very brief sucking period.
Only until this past year it appears that the Jays' ownership grasped that the sports commercial enterprise has a very different business model, including that you lose money ( formerly NOT POSSIBLE! EVER- FIREABLE OFFENCE!) on the team, but cash out big time on TV, streaming, and brand promotion. I think it is the tent pole theory, or something like that. "In television and motion pictures, a tentpole or tent-pole is a program or film that supports the financial performance of a film studio, television network, or cinema chain. It is an analogy for the way a strong central pole provides a stable structure to a tent. A tent-pole film may be expected to support the sale of tie-in merchandise."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tentpole#:~:text=In%20television%20and%20motion%20pictures,stable%20structure%20to%20a%20tent.
WE cannot properly suck and rebuild until ownership loses the "sylo" theory that every division must bring in maximum profit right now or we can your ass and bring in someone else who will also fail, and replace it with the tent-pole theory.