ImageImageImageImageImage

PG: 4th Quarter Defence!

Moderators: HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, DG88

ArthurVandelay
Head Coach
Posts: 6,796
And1: 6,539
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
 

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#61 » by ArthurVandelay » Sun Jan 4, 2026 3:49 am

Boogie! wrote:Just upgrade the bench scoring and I’ll be happy. Bring in a proven wing that can make open 3s and just not be completely useless. Who is realistically attainable?


Perhaps a BATTLE tested player?

(See what I did there)

A wing off the bench that can consistently hit open 3s changes a lot for this team.
User avatar
Thaddy
General Manager
Posts: 7,662
And1: 4,466
Joined: Dec 12, 2022

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#62 » by Thaddy » Sun Jan 4, 2026 3:49 am

CMB looks like garbage as the C. He probably needs to play with a big similar to Barnes. He doesn't have the creation ability and attention Barnes does though.

This is tough. We don't benefit from an offensive C but it seems like Maluach might have been better for us. I doubt neither of these guys amount to much but the fit made a lot more sense.

Bamba looks like a scrub too.
User avatar
lobosloboslobos
RealGM
Posts: 13,063
And1: 18,691
Joined: Jan 08, 2009
Location: space is the place
 

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#63 » by lobosloboslobos » Sun Jan 4, 2026 3:51 am

YogurtProducer wrote:I’ll take Matt + Jack over every other broadcaster in the league.



really? and you've listened to them? Jim Petersen in Minny? Clyde in New York? the Charlotte guys whatever their names are?

to each their own i guess...

someone posted this last year and to the extent of my limited knowledge it seems generally accurate to me (tho i think swirsk deserves better)

Image
Image
User avatar
ImaBeatDatAzz
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,140
And1: 4,492
Joined: May 07, 2017
Location: Toronto
   

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#64 » by ImaBeatDatAzz » Sun Jan 4, 2026 3:54 am

SFour wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:We're too talented when everyone plays. Imagine what this team looks like when Jak comes back healthy.


imagine if they can upgrade to an allstar at the PG or C spot....while keeping the core of Barnes, Ingram, RJ

legit all we need, we could make an ECF run with the core 3 + an allstar PG or C. Now i don't know what allstar C we could trade for... but a realistic option i see is Garland at PG. Can throw Lamelo in there as well - can turn him into a winning player, the talent can't be ignored
114-110... "Curry lets it fly...CANADA THE NBA TITLE IS YOURS."
User avatar
Syd-TK3
RealGM
Posts: 21,113
And1: 21,240
Joined: Jun 07, 2015
 

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#65 » by Syd-TK3 » Sun Jan 4, 2026 3:56 am

lobosloboslobos wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:I’ll take Matt + Jack over every other broadcaster in the league.



really? and you've listened to them? Jim Petersen in Minny? Clyde in New York? the Charlotte guys whatever their names are?

to each their own i guess...

someone posted this last year and to the extent of my limited knowledge it seems generally accurate to me (tho i think swirsk deserves better)

Image

No chance Miami and Lakers are S
Miami guy can't even attempt to properly say Mamu's name. I'd put Charlotte S before them easily

Also Detroit old guy talks like he commentating golf
Image
User avatar
ImaBeatDatAzz
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,140
And1: 4,492
Joined: May 07, 2017
Location: Toronto
   

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#66 » by ImaBeatDatAzz » Sun Jan 4, 2026 3:57 am

lobosloboslobos wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:I’ll take Matt + Jack over every other broadcaster in the league.



really? and you've listened to them? Jim Petersen in Minny? Clyde in New York? the Charlotte guys whatever their names are?

to each their own i guess...

someone posted this last year and to the extent of my limited knowledge it seems generally accurate to me (tho i think swirsk deserves better)

Image

the only ones deserving of an S are the Charlotte guys.. everyone else falls below them lol. not even up for debate
114-110... "Curry lets it fly...CANADA THE NBA TITLE IS YOURS."
sbsat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,744
And1: 6,349
Joined: Jan 03, 2014

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#67 » by sbsat » Sun Jan 4, 2026 4:02 am

Los_29 wrote:
Godaddycurse wrote:
Los_29 wrote:Great game. Excellent contributions from nearly everyone. Man, the Hawks are bad. Who assembled that team?


2nd game of back to back and missing their starting C. they need to trade for a better/more reliable big than KP


KP missing time is something he’s dealt with his whole career though. They knew what they were getting.

Back to backs are hard but they are a bad team. That’s the biggest issue.

sbsat wrote:
Los_29 wrote:Great game. Excellent contributions from nearly everyone. Man, the Hawks are bad. Who assembled that team?


Ex trae the hawks have a team man. Jalen johnson is nasty. They just ran out of gas today from the b2b


Where are the wins? What’s their record? It’s most certainly not a good team.


Coming into today the hawks were 15-11 without trae.
JCP11
Rookie
Posts: 1,068
And1: 737
Joined: Apr 29, 2025

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#68 » by JCP11 » Sun Jan 4, 2026 4:04 am

Thaddy wrote:CMB looks like garbage as the C. He probably needs to play with a big similar to Barnes. He doesn't have the creation ability and attention Barnes does though.

This is tough. We don't benefit from an offensive C but it seems like Maluach might have been better for us. I doubt neither of these guys amount to much but the fit made a lot more sense.

Bamba looks like a scrub too.

it's been what, 35 games? Can we wait afew seasons before making conclusions on young players?
C_Money
RealGM
Posts: 26,957
And1: 27,242
Joined: Jun 30, 2008
       

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#69 » by C_Money » Sun Jan 4, 2026 4:06 am

There are some horrible commentators out there and Matt and Jack are nowhere near as bad. They’re in the top 10 easily.
Image
sbsat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,744
And1: 6,349
Joined: Jan 03, 2014

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#70 » by sbsat » Sun Jan 4, 2026 4:09 am

Clyde and the knicks broadcast is my fave.
User avatar
Boardbreaker
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,100
And1: 7,200
Joined: Aug 04, 2002
Location: Hangin with Mr. Cooper

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#71 » by Boardbreaker » Sun Jan 4, 2026 4:10 am

C_Money wrote:There are some horrible commentators out there and Matt and Jack are nowhere near as bad. They’re in the top 10 easily.

It's a pretty low bar tbh. Funny enough I actually kind of enjoy the celtics feed now that Scalabrine's replaced Heinsohn.
FOB
Sophomore
Posts: 143
And1: 304
Joined: Dec 13, 2020
   

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#72 » by FOB » Sun Jan 4, 2026 4:13 am

sbsat wrote:
Los_29 wrote:
Godaddycurse wrote:
2nd game of back to back and missing their starting C. they need to trade for a better/more reliable big than KP


KP missing time is something he’s dealt with his whole career though. They knew what they were getting.

Back to backs are hard but they are a bad team. That’s the biggest issue.

sbsat wrote:
Ex trae the hawks have a team man. Jalen johnson is nasty. They just ran out of gas today from the b2b


Where are the wins? What’s their record? It’s most certainly not a good team.


Coming into today the hawks were 15-11 without trae.


That puts them at a slightly worse win rate than the raps are for the season (57% vs 58%), and the raps have been without one or two starters for most of the season. (and maybe their 2-9 record with trae should count a little bit as well...)
User avatar
Jakay
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 29,893
And1: 6,339
Joined: Jan 27, 2003
Location: Half out of my mind
Contact:

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#73 » by Jakay » Sun Jan 4, 2026 4:17 am

YogurtProducer wrote:
DreamTeam09 wrote:
MoneyBall wrote:Going to the game on Monday. I hope the crowd will be better than this one.


The Hawks broadcast was raving about the fan noise, "said it was non stop loud in there"

People seem to think TV broadcasts should drown out commentary and just be crowd noise lol


Which is really great. A lot of streams used to do this. Loved it.

Was nicer to listen than Jack "I won't be watching on Monday but best of luck"
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 18,343
And1: 13,297
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#74 » by PushDaRock » Sun Jan 4, 2026 4:18 am

ArthurVandelay wrote:
XTC wrote:
ArthurVandelay wrote:
If RJ is the offence, then yes

Edit: he isn’t the offence but he is the special ingredient, the secret sauce


RJ is the connector on offense. He doesn't hold the ball, he applies pressure, and his ability to make a quick decision to either score or pass the ball unlocks a new dimension for us offensively.

Hopefully the RJ haters shut up now, and realize just how valuable he is. RJ is a steady guy you can consistently rely on to give you 20/6/4 every night without pounding the ball.


I agree with all that. I’d add he also doesn’t need the ball to score. He’s elite at cutting, getting out in transition, and moving to the open spot on the 3 point line.


There was a lot of discussion about how RJ's cutting numbers weren't that good last season and people dismissing how good of an off ball player he actually is. I think this year he's done more cutting in this offense but that's in addition to how good he is driving when he catches the ball on the move which has always been the case. He's just that outlet they find a lot in this offense without running many plays for him, the ball just finds him when it needs to and he uses his scoring instincts to put the ball in the bucket.
PushDaRock
RealGM
Posts: 18,343
And1: 13,297
Joined: Jun 22, 2011

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#75 » by PushDaRock » Sun Jan 4, 2026 4:22 am

DreamTeam09 wrote:
mdenny wrote:
HiJiNX wrote:This era of NBA is different. Feels like the development window is longer in the last 10-15 years.


This is an EXCELLENT point and there has to be some data to show it. If true.....it has all sorts of ramnifications in team building.


he could always score the ball, he wasn't gonna stick like that being drafted at 17 tho, he's definitely breaking out this year tho


Obviously he didn't just develop this much in one off season so he's had this ability for a little while now probably but it's a massive jump nonetheless in a totally different role.
sbsat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,744
And1: 6,349
Joined: Jan 03, 2014

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#76 » by sbsat » Sun Jan 4, 2026 4:23 am

FOB wrote:
sbsat wrote:
Los_29 wrote:
KP missing time is something he’s dealt with his whole career though. They knew what they were getting.

Back to backs are hard but they are a bad team. That’s the biggest issue.



Where are the wins? What’s their record? It’s most certainly not a good team.


Coming into today the hawks were 15-11 without trae.


That puts them at a slightly worse win rate than the raps are for the season (57% vs 58%), and the raps have been without one or two starters for most of the season. (and maybe their 2-9 record with trae should count a little bit as well...)


The raptors fully healthy have a team too. Hobestly they do. The hawks with trae is a big black hole kn that roster and if they can move him for some viable pieces i think they have a solid platform to build on
User avatar
MEDIC
RealGM
Posts: 21,264
And1: 12,037
Joined: Jul 25, 2006

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#77 » by MEDIC » Sun Jan 4, 2026 4:25 am

HiJiNX wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:This NAW leap really came out of nowhere, just not often you see a strictly 3&D guy transform into a decent on ball guy 7 seasons in.

This era of NBA is different. Feels like the development window is longer in the last 10-15 years.


It depends on how hard these guys work. I am a firm believer that if these guys want it bad enough, study the game, study the moves, & work their azzes.off trying to master them, they will eventually figure it out. We don't kmow what kind.of work NAW has been putting in over the years. He has a superatar cousin that I am sure he admires & draws inspiration from.

We have seen a number of players pass through here that take a big step post 25 yo.
Image
* Props to the man, the myth, the legend......TZ.
User avatar
Indeed
RealGM
Posts: 22,036
And1: 3,691
Joined: Aug 21, 2009

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#78 » by Indeed » Sun Jan 4, 2026 4:29 am

TheRaptor! wrote:
Indeed wrote:
TheRaptor! wrote:If we can trade our useless pieces to upgrade the PG spot and get a solid 6th man scorer we'll be in good hands.

Assuming Yak is fine


Easy to say in getting ride of our existing contract.
I think the Bulls may have some 3&D point guards in expiring, but I don't think we would give them a pick for taking Quickley, and unsure we want to take on a contract like Patrick Williams.


Thats not upgrading the PG spot, im talkin bout Ja Ball or Trae lol


You are either downgrading the C spot or trading both guards for one.
We are not going way over the tax, and we cannot match salary without giving more, there is no other way.
User avatar
MEDIC
RealGM
Posts: 21,264
And1: 12,037
Joined: Jul 25, 2006

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#79 » by MEDIC » Sun Jan 4, 2026 4:31 am

SFour wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:We're too talented when everyone plays. Imagine what this team looks like when Jak comes back healthy.


imagine if they can upgrade to an allstar at the PG or C spot....while keeping the core of Barnes, Ingram, RJ


That's my hope. You keep these 3 guys together & try to find a way to land a big fish at one of those two positions. It doesn't even have to be a true star. A vet tbat is a competent two way player (bordeline allstar).
Image
* Props to the man, the myth, the legend......TZ.
User avatar
Indeed
RealGM
Posts: 22,036
And1: 3,691
Joined: Aug 21, 2009

Re: PG: 4th Quarter Defence! 

Post#80 » by Indeed » Sun Jan 4, 2026 4:36 am

MEDIC wrote:
SFour wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:We're too talented when everyone plays. Imagine what this team looks like when Jak comes back healthy.


imagine if they can upgrade to an allstar at the PG or C spot....while keeping the core of Barnes, Ingram, RJ


That's my hope. You keep these 3 guys together & try to find a way to land a big fish at one of those two positions. It doesn't even have to be a true star. A vet tbat is a competent two way player (bordeline allstar).


Indeed, salary doesn't work for having 3 near-max (25% of salary) with another high salary (20% of salary), particularly in a year or two when Barrett needs to re-new his contract.

Filling the PG and C for each 15% of salary would be the goal.

Return to Toronto Raptors