ImageImageImageImageImage

Trae to wizards for CJ

Moderators: HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, DG88

sidsid
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,092
And1: 3,846
Joined: Jun 03, 2003

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#81 » by sidsid » Thu Jan 8, 2026 4:25 am

ConSarnit wrote:
Los_29 wrote:And people thought we should’ve traded IQ and Poeltl for Trae. :lol:

Trae’s value is extremely low and is worth very little. He just simply isn’t a winning player and will command a lot of money.

Even I thought he would go for more than this.


Don't forget a lightly protected 1st in ‘28!

This is just a straight up salary dump for a guy who is 27 and is a 3x all-star. I’m with you, I never thought the price would be this low.


I mean the reason we would be paying a pick is not because Trae is good or that we'd want him, it's because the Hawks would be taking on 4 years of tons of money for Jak and IQ while Trae expires next year.

Everyone needs to recalibrate what they think these overpaid chuckers are worth. MPJ required a pick to get off his deal, too. MPJ will have plenty of value next year...when he's expiring.
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 34,148
And1: 49,074
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#82 » by Tor_Raps » Thu Jan 8, 2026 4:26 am

SFour wrote:that's a cheap trade for Wizards....I think Raptors equivalent would be IQ/Dick/Ochai


This is actually much better than what Atlanta got as of now. We'll see what they do with the expirings they just got though
User avatar
Thaddy
General Manager
Posts: 7,662
And1: 4,466
Joined: Dec 12, 2022

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#83 » by Thaddy » Thu Jan 8, 2026 4:31 am

IQ/Dick/Ochai is an overpay for Young. That's a decent starter and 2 lottery picks. If we lost on Ingram I could see us going for Young.
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,488
And1: 14,107
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#84 » by Los_29 » Thu Jan 8, 2026 4:33 am

sidsid wrote:
ConSarnit wrote:
Los_29 wrote:And people thought we should’ve traded IQ and Poeltl for Trae. :lol:

Trae’s value is extremely low and is worth very little. He just simply isn’t a winning player and will command a lot of money.

Even I thought he would go for more than this.


Don't forget a lightly protected 1st in ‘28!

This is just a straight up salary dump for a guy who is 27 and is a 3x all-star. I’m with you, I never thought the price would be this low.


I mean the reason we would be paying a pick is not because Trae is good or that we'd want him, it's because the Hawks would be taking on 4 years of tons of money for Jak and IQ while Trae expires next year.

Everyone needs to recalibrate what they think these overpaid chuckers are worth. MPJ required a pick to get off his deal, too. MPJ will have plenty of value next year...when he's expiring.


But the fact Trae is being dealt for nothing just shows you how he’s viewed around the league. If we want to win, there is no point in giving away IQ and Poeltl. Now we know that even offering one of them up would’ve been an overpay. lol. It was a nonsensical offer from people overreacting to IQ having a mediocre game and Poeltl being hurt.

People on here just overvalued Trae way too much. The fact the Wizards who are a horrible organization got him says a lot.
sidsid
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,092
And1: 3,846
Joined: Jun 03, 2003

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#85 » by sidsid » Thu Jan 8, 2026 4:35 am

Tor_Raps wrote:
SFour wrote:that's a cheap trade for Wizards....I think Raptors equivalent would be IQ/Dick/Ochai


This is actually much better than what Atlanta got as of now. We'll see what they do with the expirings they just got though


The initial plan is to not blow past the tax aprons next year if they land AD this deadline. That's why the Wizards deal is much better for them. It does open about 30 mil in cap space next year if it doesn't work out

This is the same reason a washed KO on a 2 year deal had a lot more value than RJ to the Pelicans in the BI trade

The League is perfectly fine looking for cheaper alternatives
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 34,148
And1: 49,074
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#86 » by Tor_Raps » Thu Jan 8, 2026 4:41 am

sidsid wrote:
Tor_Raps wrote:
SFour wrote:that's a cheap trade for Wizards....I think Raptors equivalent would be IQ/Dick/Ochai


This is actually much better than what Atlanta got as of now. We'll see what they do with the expirings they just got though


The initial plan is to not blow past the tax aprons next year if they land AD this deadline. That's why the Wizards deal is much better for them. It does open about 30 mil in cap space next year if it doesn't work out

This is the same reason a washed KO on a 2 year deal had a lot more value than RJ to the Pelicans in the BI trade

The League is perfectly fine looking for cheaper alternatives


But what are you even going to do with the 30M of cap space when all the good players are forcing trades to get extended?
sidsid
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,092
And1: 3,846
Joined: Jun 03, 2003

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#87 » by sidsid » Thu Jan 8, 2026 4:43 am

Los_29 wrote:
sidsid wrote:
ConSarnit wrote:
Don't forget a lightly protected 1st in ‘28!

This is just a straight up salary dump for a guy who is 27 and is a 3x all-star. I’m with you, I never thought the price would be this low.


I mean the reason we would be paying a pick is not because Trae is good or that we'd want him, it's because the Hawks would be taking on 4 years of tons of money for Jak and IQ while Trae expires next year.

Everyone needs to recalibrate what they think these overpaid chuckers are worth. MPJ required a pick to get off his deal, too. MPJ will have plenty of value next year...when he's expiring.


But the fact Trae is being dealt for nothing just shows you how he’s viewed around the league. If we want to win, there is no point in giving away IQ and Poeltl. Now we know that even offering one of them up would’ve been an overpay. lol. It was a nonsensical offer from people overreacting to IQ having a mediocre game and Poeltl being hurt.

People on here just overvalued Trae way too much. The fact the Wizards who are a horrible organization got him says a lot.


It's true that Trae doesn't help in the actual getting better department. Neither do Jak and IQ. That's why the FO has been trying to move both RJ and IQ for stars like KD or AD now.

The Trae trade would be a pure cap cleaning move, which likely has more value to getting to that goal than their current contracts hold. CJ's old ass has more value than Trae, and that's just the reality of the apron era.
sidsid
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,092
And1: 3,846
Joined: Jun 03, 2003

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#88 » by sidsid » Thu Jan 8, 2026 4:48 am

Tor_Raps wrote:
sidsid wrote:
Tor_Raps wrote:
This is actually much better than what Atlanta got as of now. We'll see what they do with the expirings they just got though


The initial plan is to not blow past the tax aprons next year if they land AD this deadline. That's why the Wizards deal is much better for them. It does open about 30 mil in cap space next year if it doesn't work out

This is the same reason a washed KO on a 2 year deal had a lot more value than RJ to the Pelicans in the BI trade

The League is perfectly fine looking for cheaper alternatives


But what are you even going to do with the 30M of cap space when all the good players are forcing trades to get extended?


For a rebuilding team? Do more MPJ/Poole trades! FA is where the dumb money gets spent. As we've seen almost every year, you can get a reclamation project contract and get paid draft assets to take them into your cap space if there isn't a star worth paying.
User avatar
MEDIC
RealGM
Posts: 21,259
And1: 12,035
Joined: Jul 25, 2006

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#89 » by MEDIC » Thu Jan 8, 2026 4:53 am

I wonder if Trae simply wanted to go to the team that was most likely to pay him another big contract. Was there already an agreement with Washington to re-sign?
Image
* Props to the man, the myth, the legend......TZ.
Tor_Raps
RealGM
Posts: 34,148
And1: 49,074
Joined: Oct 14, 2018

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#90 » by Tor_Raps » Thu Jan 8, 2026 5:02 am

MEDIC wrote:I wonder if Trae simply wanted to go to the team that was most likely to pay him another big contract. Was there already an agreement with Washington to re-sign?


Thats exactly why he wanted to go to Washington. Rumor was that they were the only team willing to give him the money and role he wanted as the lead gaurd.

Kinda makes me respect him less to go there during your prime. Shows he gives no craps about winning.
User avatar
ontnut
RealGM
Posts: 12,261
And1: 9,215
Joined: Jan 31, 2009
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#91 » by ontnut » Thu Jan 8, 2026 5:13 am

A guy who can't win goes to a team that doesn't know how to win. Match made in heaven.
Image
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 32,249
And1: 34,629
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#92 » by YogurtProducer » Thu Jan 8, 2026 5:24 am

sidsid wrote:
ConSarnit wrote:
Los_29 wrote:And people thought we should’ve traded IQ and Poeltl for Trae. :lol:

Trae’s value is extremely low and is worth very little. He just simply isn’t a winning player and will command a lot of money.

Even I thought he would go for more than this.


Don't forget a lightly protected 1st in ‘28!

This is just a straight up salary dump for a guy who is 27 and is a 3x all-star. I’m with you, I never thought the price would be this low.


I mean the reason we would be paying a pick is not because Trae is good or that we'd want him, it's because the Hawks would be taking on 4 years of tons of money for Jak and IQ while Trae expires next year.

Everyone needs to recalibrate what they think these overpaid chuckers are worth. MPJ required a pick to get off his deal, too. MPJ will have plenty of value next year...when he's expiring.
I would bet we never came close to offering any of that for Trae.

I don't think our FO views IQ/Jak nearly as negatively as RealGM does.
ArthurVandelay
Head Coach
Posts: 6,796
And1: 6,539
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
 

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#93 » by ArthurVandelay » Thu Jan 8, 2026 9:55 am

bballsparkin wrote:
ArthurVandelay wrote:
He wasn’t traded for CJ. He was traded for Kispert and getting off $49m next season.

CJ to Trae is as BI to Bruce


Agreed, although CJ is playing well and can help the Hawks this season or perhaps be involved in a bigger deal like AD.


CJ can’t be aggregated with other salary once the deal is official. Definitely a chance that Dallas gets roped in before official though, but doesn’t sound like it.
MiamiSPX
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,915
And1: 7,478
Joined: May 19, 2023
         

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#94 » by MiamiSPX » Thu Jan 8, 2026 10:55 am

mdenny wrote:
ConSarnit wrote:
mdenny wrote:
Washington doesn't have any reason to get him on a cheaper deal. The salary floor is 140 and they are only at 67 currently. So they will probably gladly offer to pay him for 2 more years until they have to start extending their prospects.

So if they give Trae 2 years at 50 per.....that brings them up to 117. Then they're adding two more draft picks and sign 2 or 3 veterans to make up the difference.


Why would they give Trae a raise? If Trae is going to play hardball tell him he can just opt out of his $48m next year if he doesn’t want an extension.

The Wiz hold the cards here. They are one of the few cap space team who might actually give him $40m/yr. If he walks who cares. All if cost then was overpaid Kispert.

If the Wiz are going to go the FVV/Harris route of overpaying a vet they’re going to have to keep some real cap space open.

Ingram got 25% of the cap. Why would the Wiz give Trae (a guy who just got flat out dumped) more than that?

My guess is Trae gets 3/130 with a PO in the 3rd year.


Because they have to hit the salary floor! They are going to HAVE to drastically overpay someone.

The negotiation already happened. Trae didnt request a trade to the wizards without agreeing to something.


It's this. If I am not mistaken, Young can be extended right away. So I expect the announcement on a new contract in the next few days. Just like us with BI.
mtcan
RealGM
Posts: 28,122
And1: 24,580
Joined: May 19, 2001

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#95 » by mtcan » Thu Jan 8, 2026 12:07 pm

ArthurVandelay wrote:
bballsparkin wrote:
ArthurVandelay wrote:
He wasn’t traded for CJ. He was traded for Kispert and getting off $49m next season.

CJ to Trae is as BI to Bruce


Agreed, although CJ is playing well and can help the Hawks this season or perhaps be involved in a bigger deal like AD.


CJ can’t be aggregated with other salary once the deal is official. Definitely a chance that Dallas gets roped in before official though, but doesn’t sound like it.

Hawks still have PorIngis' expiring contract...so they can attach Risacher and another contract.
ArthurVandelay
Head Coach
Posts: 6,796
And1: 6,539
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
 

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#96 » by ArthurVandelay » Thu Jan 8, 2026 1:35 pm

mtcan wrote:
ArthurVandelay wrote:
bballsparkin wrote:
Agreed, although CJ is playing well and can help the Hawks this season or perhaps be involved in a bigger deal like AD.


CJ can’t be aggregated with other salary once the deal is official. Definitely a chance that Dallas gets roped in before official though, but doesn’t sound like it.

Hawks still have PorIngis' expiring contract...so they can attach Risacher and another contract.


and Kennard

They have enough to get Davis: Zinger, Kennard, and Risacher gets it done.

CJ will also be available to be traded on his own.
User avatar
dacrusha
RealGM
Posts: 12,698
And1: 5,418
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
       

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#97 » by dacrusha » Thu Jan 8, 2026 2:24 pm

Hawks and Wiz both bottom feeders, but Hawks make the right move for their rebuild.

Wiz are nuts to bring this guy in - all time terrible defender, all time high usage rate and looking for another payday contract. How will this type of presence serve as a positive influence on their young players?
"If you can’t make a profit, you should sell your team" - Michael Jordan
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 94,913
And1: 34,240
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#98 » by tsherkin » Thu Jan 8, 2026 2:33 pm

Peanuts for Trae, but he's going to the Wizards. They suck.

They have some interesting youth, but they're so, so bad on either end of the floor. If Trae thought it was hard winning in Atlanta, then Washington is going to be a whole new deal for him, because man. They're horrific. I think he demonstrated something about himself choosing that as a destination, honestly.
MoneyBall
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,871
And1: 4,199
Joined: May 02, 2009

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#99 » by MoneyBall » Thu Jan 8, 2026 2:40 pm

Excellent trade for the Wizards. I actually think Trae and Sarr compliment each other super well. The problem for the Wizards is that the rest of the team sucks. This is the first time since forever that I feel like the Wizards are going in the right direction.
sidsid
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,092
And1: 3,846
Joined: Jun 03, 2003

Re: Trae to wizards for CJ 

Post#100 » by sidsid » Thu Jan 8, 2026 2:54 pm

YogurtProducer wrote:
sidsid wrote:
ConSarnit wrote:
Don't forget a lightly protected 1st in ‘28!

This is just a straight up salary dump for a guy who is 27 and is a 3x all-star. I’m with you, I never thought the price would be this low.


I mean the reason we would be paying a pick is not because Trae is good or that we'd want him, it's because the Hawks would be taking on 4 years of tons of money for Jak and IQ while Trae expires next year.

Everyone needs to recalibrate what they think these overpaid chuckers are worth. MPJ required a pick to get off his deal, too. MPJ will have plenty of value next year...when he's expiring.
I would bet we never came close to offering any of that for Trae.

I don't think our FO views IQ/Jak nearly as negatively as RealGM does.


No, they don't. But what our FO thinks of our players doesn't matter. It's what the the team you're trading to thinks of the players, as the Hawks learned when they thought they should get picks for Trae while the Wizards informed them that it's the other way around.

And "what they think of the players" as actual talent in the apron era is often secondary to the size and length of contract. To the Hawks, Kispert is 3 years of money they just don't want to pay to him, which likely is where the negotiation for picks ended as that's the Wizards compensation for taking on Trae.

Return to Toronto Raptors