ArthurVandelay wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:ArthurVandelay wrote:The idea of Sabonis has grown on me, but the good thing is the Raptors aren’t in a dire position to do something now. However something will have to be done at some point in the near future. Too much money tied up in average to below average starting PG and C, a bench that can’t shoot with any consistency (besides awful), and no one who can consistently get downhill off the bounce.
I dont think IQ or Poeltl are below average. They're both in that mid 15th range at their position I'd say. Pretty average starters.
Our bench is currently shooting:
Shead - 32.6%
Walter - 35.8%
Dick - 32.0%
Mamu - 38.1%
CMB - 38.5%
All things considered, that's a fairly decent bench shooting unit. The league average is 35.9%, and our bench has 2 below, 1 average, and 2 above average shooters % wise. The real issue shooting wise off the bench is Shead as typically your PG should be a good shooter, and our "specialist" in Dick is anything but. But Walter/Mamu/CMB have all been fine shooting wise.
Did you read what I said: They are AVERAGE to below average. I’d lean more towards below personally but I also recognize my bias of watching more Raptors games than anyone else.
Yes, which means you view them below average, as you even admit. If average is 15th, and below average is say, 30th. You suggested they are 21st-23rdish. I don't agree with that at all.
The average NBA salary is $11.9m this season
The median salary is $6m this season
$52m and soon to be $60m from those two is disgraceful cap management when you also have Scottie, BI, and RJ.
There is no value from any starter so the two worst really do stand out.
In a league of rookie contracts you can't just look at average and medians and make any sort of freaking conclusions
We currently have 33.6% of our cap tied up in Jak/IQ. By IQ's last year it will be 33.9%.
That is FAR from "disgraceful" cap management. IDK if you've looked around the league, but paying 15-20% of your cap for good starting caliber players is literally what every single NBA team has to do. WE might see a change in the trends now happening with the new CBA, but it is not going to be ANYWHERE near the "average" $11.9m or anything like that.
Also, did you read what I said about consistency? A bench that can’t shoot consistently. The most consistent shooter off the bench has been Mamu. CMB volume way too low to count. But then there is Battle at 48.5% who must have killed Darko’s dog or groped his wife at an early season team party.
You can type up all the stats you want. Anyone who’s watched the games know the bench who actually play can’t shoot a lick consistently outside Mamu.
I mean, that is not true, but okay.
Shooting is inherently inconsistent. Every single NBA player in the entire freaking league is an "inconsistent' shooter because we are talking about something where the elite only get it right 40% of the time. Then when you dial down the sample to "just bench players" you are looking at samples of like 14 shots per night and expecting these to be "consistent".
3 point shooting is NOISY. Even elite players go from hitting multiple 3's to only 1 on any given night. It is just the reality of the type of shot.
Hell, DEN is the best shooting team in the league at 40%. However, that hasn't changed the fact in their 37 games their %'s are all over the place.
<30% - 6 times
30-35% - 6 times
36-40% - 8 times
40-45% - 7 times
46-50% - 5 times
50% - 4 times
Is that not "inconsistent"?