ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread Part XLVII

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,607
And1: 10,870
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1881 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Tue Jan 13, 2026 12:33 am

payitforward wrote:
nate33 wrote:
payitforward wrote:I'd rather keep Bagley & trade Branham -- if possible -- for whatever draft capital we can get for him.
We would get zero draft capital for Branham. Nobody gives draft capital to a 10th man on a bad team making double the vet minimum. Branham is salary filler, nothing else....
:) -- I know....

nate33 wrote:Bagley has value because he is outplaying his minimum salary contract by a ton. And I don't mind trading him because he will be an unrestricted free agent this summer anyhow. If we want him on the roster going forward, it makes no difference whether he finishes the season on our roster. We can still sign him this summer. (Remember, we signed him last summer after trading him to Memphis at the last Trade Deadline.)

The only thing we lose by trading Bagley right now is more games - which is what we are trying to do.

:) All good points, of course. Somehow -- slowly & w/o my noticing it -- Bagley has become one of my favorite Wizards. :) Go figure.

Still... I could get used to the idea that every off season we sign him for 1 year, then trade him for some minimal value at the deadline, then sign him again the following off season! It's like free money. :)


Mine, too.

I think Bagley should become the new Anthony Gill.
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 25,034
And1: 4,764
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1882 » by closg00 » Tue Jan 13, 2026 12:56 pm

9 and 20
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,906
And1: 1,412
Joined: Mar 28, 2021
 

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1883 » by 9 and 20 » Tue Jan 13, 2026 1:36 pm

That Quickley contract is too ugly.

What about Jonathan Isaac? We could send them Midds and they would send us Isaac and maybe some expiring contracts - Jett Howard and Tyus Jones possibly. If they attach a draft pick, even a far off future one, I'd probably do that, as long as it's a first round pick. Need to keep stacking those assets.

Or something smaller - Branham and Bagley for Isaac and a pick?
Can't say I do. Who else gonna shoot?
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 25,034
And1: 4,764
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1884 » by closg00 » Tue Jan 13, 2026 3:06 pm

Perhaps there is a KD curse, the man has bad juju.
Read on Twitter
MDStar
Senior
Posts: 572
And1: 120
Joined: Oct 22, 2003
Location: Washington, DC

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1885 » by MDStar » Tue Jan 13, 2026 6:20 pm

With the news that Anthony Davis is going to be out for several months, the Wizards could do something hilarious and figure out a way to add him, to Trae, the top 4 pick and Sarr+ and try to go for a legit winning team. Now I personally don’t want AD and his fragile, aging self but one can’t say it wouldn’t be interesting to see on paper.
Just let the young boys play! It's truly the only hope at this point.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,321
And1: 9,520
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1886 » by payitforward » Tue Jan 13, 2026 7:28 pm

I wouldn't trade our top pick for AD! let alone what you're suggesting. In fact, I wouldn't dream of trading Sarr straight up for him.
wait... i read tht all wrong! sorry!
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,321
And1: 9,520
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1887 » by payitforward » Tue Jan 13, 2026 7:35 pm

All the same, I wouldn't be confident that AD has enough left in the tank....
WallToWall
Veteran
Posts: 2,943
And1: 1,091
Joined: May 20, 2010
         

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1888 » by WallToWall » Wed Jan 14, 2026 5:07 am

Has there been a player who has been traded away twice, in consecutive seasons, by one team? I *think* the answer is "no", and for only that reason I would entertain trading Bagley. He has outplayed his contract, and is value to any team needing a C that he goes to. Of course, I would without hesitation, re-sign him in free agency...again.

As for Middleton... wouldnt it be better if we dont trade him and let his $33M contract expire? The free agency market could be good this year. Hartenstein, John Collins, Kuminga, Nurkic, Mitchell Robinson, Robert Williams, Ayton, many more.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,321
And1: 9,520
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1889 » by payitforward » Wed Jan 14, 2026 12:12 pm

WallToWall wrote:Has there been a player who has been traded away twice, in consecutive seasons, by one team? I *think* the answer is "no", and for only that reason I would entertain trading Bagley. He has outplayed his contract, and is value to any team needing a C that he goes to. Of course, I would without hesitation, re-sign him in free agency...again....
Yep!!!

and
WallToWall wrote:As for Middleton... wouldnt it be better if we dont trade him and let his $33M contract expire? The free agency market could be good this year. Hartenstein, John Collins, Kuminga, Nurkic, Mitchell Robinson, Robert Williams, Ayton, many more.
Yep again!
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 21,534
And1: 5,706
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1890 » by tontoz » Wed Jan 14, 2026 1:22 pm

WallToWall wrote:Has there been a player who has been traded away twice, in consecutive seasons, by one team? I *think* the answer is "no", and for only that reason I would entertain trading Bagley. He has outplayed his contract, and is value to any team needing a C that he goes to. Of course, I would without hesitation, re-sign him in free agency...again.

As for Middleton... wouldnt it be better if we dont trade him and let his $33M contract expire? The free agency market could be good this year. Hartenstein, John Collins, Kuminga, Nurkic, Mitchell Robinson, Robert Williams, Ayton, many more.



Actually it would be better if we just buy out Middleton, which is what i expect to happen.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
lastemp3ror
Junior
Posts: 422
And1: 164
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
   

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1891 » by lastemp3ror » Wed Jan 14, 2026 1:28 pm

tontoz wrote:
WallToWall wrote:Has there been a player who has been traded away twice, in consecutive seasons, by one team? I *think* the answer is "no", and for only that reason I would entertain trading Bagley. He has outplayed his contract, and is value to any team needing a C that he goes to. Of course, I would without hesitation, re-sign him in free agency...again.

As for Middleton... wouldnt it be better if we dont trade him and let his $33M contract expire? The free agency market could be good this year. Hartenstein, John Collins, Kuminga, Nurkic, Mitchell Robinson, Robert Williams, Ayton, many more.



Actually it would be better if we just buy out Middleton, which is what i expect to happen.


Will he find a team that will make up the difference between the money he loses in a buy-out and his new contract? He looks a bit cooked out there, and I don't see more than a veteran minimum contract in his future.

Financially speaking, it may be best for him to stick it out get all of his remaining big contract from the Wizards, then sign on a vet minimum with probably any team of his choice next year.
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,636
And1: 2,017
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1892 » by gambitx777 » Wed Jan 14, 2026 2:04 pm

I only wanna trade Bagley so we can sign him again in the summer for slightly more money and trade home again

Sent from my SM-S926U1 using RealGM mobile app
Lucky Once
Sophomore
Posts: 111
And1: 91
Joined: Feb 02, 2023
 

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1893 » by Lucky Once » Wed Jan 14, 2026 2:07 pm

The possible break out of Peyton Watson in Denver opens up some interesting possibilities. If this increase in production is real then Denver is going to have some difficult choices to make this offseason. He will be restricted so they will have the ability to match any offers but they're sitting at $203m payroll with only 7 players (not including team options, etc). To match a big offer they're likely looking at a salary dump of Christian Braun or Cam Johnson ($23m and $21m).

The Wizards could potentially poach Watson (turns 24 in September) or extract some value by facilitating a salary dump to allow Denver to resign him. Apologies if this was already discussed.
Frichuela
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,917
And1: 3,930
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
 

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1894 » by Frichuela » Wed Jan 14, 2026 3:10 pm

As posted by Lucky Once, given Peyton Watson's emergence in Denver, I wonder if Dawkins is sniffing around to take Cam Johnson's contract off their hands so Denver can resign Watson next year. Johnson has an additional year in his contract.

Obviously, we would be looking to get their 2026 1st in such trade plus young talent (DaRon Holmes?).

Another option is to wait and bid aggressively for Watson in RFA...but I guess Denver will likely match, Watson's numbers are impressive as of late...

Read on Twitter
?s=20
ledell_gumbo
Ballboy
Posts: 28
And1: 24
Joined: Jul 09, 2025

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1895 » by ledell_gumbo » Wed Jan 14, 2026 3:28 pm

Even if Denver needs to clear salary, all those players are too valuable to be salary dumps. Pistons, for example, would be happy to take Cam Johnson, I'm sure.
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,334
And1: 2,873
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1896 » by pcbothwel » Wed Jan 14, 2026 4:19 pm

ledell_gumbo wrote:Even if Denver needs to clear salary, all those players are too valuable to be salary dumps. Pistons, for example, would be happy to take Cam Johnson, I'm sure.


Agreed... Although Braun and Nnaji making 30M next year is a tough pill
User avatar
Chocolate City Jordanaire
RealGM
Posts: 55,607
And1: 10,870
Joined: Aug 05, 2001
       

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1897 » by Chocolate City Jordanaire » Wed Jan 14, 2026 8:01 pm

tontoz wrote:
WallToWall wrote:Has there been a player who has been traded away twice, in consecutive seasons, by one team? I *think* the answer is "no", and for only that reason I would entertain trading Bagley. He has outplayed his contract, and is value to any team needing a C that he goes to. Of course, I would without hesitation, re-sign him in free agency...again.

As for Middleton... wouldnt it be better if we dont trade him and let his $33M contract expire? The free agency market could be good this year. Hartenstein, John Collins, Kuminga, Nurkic, Mitchell Robinson, Robert Williams, Ayton, many more.



Actually it would be better if we just buy out Middleton, which is what i expect to happen.
Agreed.

By buying him out, Khris could join the Lakers, Celtics, Nuggets, Spurs, or some other team with high playoffs hopes.

Midds can still hoop.
Lucky Once
Sophomore
Posts: 111
And1: 91
Joined: Feb 02, 2023
 

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1898 » by Lucky Once » Wed Jan 14, 2026 8:52 pm

ledell_gumbo wrote:Even if Denver needs to clear salary, all those players are too valuable to be salary dumps. Pistons, for example, would be happy to take Cam Johnson, I'm sure.


It all depends on the deal and the players involved. It's possible the Wizards could provide some tax relief for one or more of the teams involved in exchange for some asset(s). Just something to consider.
prime1time
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,263
And1: 2,415
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1899 » by prime1time » Wed Jan 14, 2026 9:20 pm

Frichuela wrote:As posted by Lucky Once, given Peyton Watson's emergence in Denver, I wonder if Dawkins is sniffing around to take Cam Johnson's contract off their hands so Denver can resign Watson next year. Johnson has an additional year in his contract.

Obviously, we would be looking to get their 2026 1st in such trade plus young talent (DaRon Holmes?).

Another option is to wait and bid aggressively for Watson in RFA...but I guess Denver will likely match, Watson's numbers are impressive as of late...

Read on Twitter
?s=20

You think Cam Johnson has a negative trade value?
joshuacf
Junior
Posts: 353
And1: 168
Joined: May 17, 2023
 

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1900 » by joshuacf » Thu Jan 15, 2026 6:29 am

We need to trade Bagley ASAP so we can find out what we have in Vuk… no reason that Bagley should be playing 27 mpg and Vuk 8.

Return to Washington Wizards