ImageImageImageImageImage

Official Trade Thread Part XLVII

Moderators: nate33, montestewart, LyricalRico

User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 71,487
And1: 24,158
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1941 » by nate33 » Sun Jan 18, 2026 1:10 am

tontoz wrote:Now that the clippers are playing better I think that makes it more likely that we can trade a future pick for OKC's clippers pick.

It will depend on the terms.

Let's say the Clippers end up with the #14 pick. Would you trade our 2029 FRP unprotected for the #14 pick? And if we put, say, top 4 protection on it, would OKC make that trade?
User avatar
tontoz
RealGM
Posts: 21,534
And1: 5,706
Joined: Apr 11, 2005

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1942 » by tontoz » Sun Jan 18, 2026 1:29 am

nate33 wrote:
tontoz wrote:Now that the clippers are playing better I think that makes it more likely that we can trade a future pick for OKC's clippers pick.

It will depend on the terms.

Let's say the Clippers end up with the #14 pick. Would you trade our 2029 FRP unprotected for the #14 pick? And if we put, say, top 4 protection on it, would OKC make that trade?



I would think so given their roster/cap crunch.
"bulky agile perimeter bone crunch pick setting draymond green" WizD
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 71,487
And1: 24,158
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1943 » by nate33 » Sun Jan 18, 2026 1:38 am

tontoz wrote:
nate33 wrote:
tontoz wrote:Now that the clippers are playing better I think that makes it more likely that we can trade a future pick for OKC's clippers pick.

It will depend on the terms.

Let's say the Clippers end up with the #14 pick. Would you trade our 2029 FRP unprotected for the #14 pick? And if we put, say, top 4 protection on it, would OKC make that trade?



I would think so given their roster/cap crunch.

I guess part of this decision would depend on whether we landed a top 2 pick in this draft. With Dybantsa or Peterson in the fold, I'd feel pretty good about trading away our 2029 or 2030 FRP. But if we end up with the #5 or #6 pick in 2026, I'd be hesitant about trading away a future pick.

If we didn't land a top 4 pick in 2026, I'd discuss maybe trading that 2029 Portland pick (second best of Portland, Milwaukee, Boston). But I don't think I'd give up our own.
hoopsfan777
Junior
Posts: 364
And1: 66
Joined: Jun 01, 2025
         

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1944 » by hoopsfan777 » Sun Jan 18, 2026 2:06 am

Middleton + Branham + 1st rd pick
4
Zion
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 71,487
And1: 24,158
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1945 » by nate33 » Sun Jan 18, 2026 2:13 am

hoopsfan777 wrote:Middleton + Branham + 1st rd pick
4
Zion

Which 1st round pick?

I might trade the 2026 pick we have from OKC for him. But it's absurd to expect that we would give up our high lotto pick.
payitforward
RealGM
Posts: 25,321
And1: 9,520
Joined: May 02, 2012
Location: On the Atlantic

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1946 » by payitforward » Sun Jan 18, 2026 2:13 pm

I don't even like *that* idea, to tell the truth. The best word to describe Zion's NBA career is "failure."
pcbothwel
Head Coach
Posts: 6,334
And1: 2,873
Joined: Jun 12, 2010
     

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1947 » by pcbothwel » Sun Jan 18, 2026 9:09 pm

nate33 wrote:
hoopsfan777 wrote:Middleton + Branham + 1st rd pick
4
Zion

Which 1st round pick?

I might trade the 2026 pick we have from OKC for him. But it's absurd to expect that we would give up our high lotto pick.


We are a bad fit for Zion/NOP. Maybe in the offseason once we’ve locked in our top pick. But our primary offering is cap relief, but NOP isn’t in the luxury tax.

Someone else would offer bad salary and a better asset than pick 30. I guess it depends on how NOP views itself. Teams like Toronto, Utah, Philly, Suns… even Knicks would seem more interested and offer pieces to replace Zion.
9 and 20
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,906
And1: 1,412
Joined: Mar 28, 2021
 

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1948 » by 9 and 20 » Mon Jan 19, 2026 12:36 am

Yeah, we're a bad landing spot for Zion. Send him somewhere more boring than DC - Portland, Denver, or OKC would fit. I could see the Lakers trying to get him at a discount. Zion in LA has some serious dark comedy or even dumb and dumber slapstick potential.
Can't say I do. Who else gonna shoot?
User avatar
gambitx777
RealGM
Posts: 10,636
And1: 2,017
Joined: Dec 18, 2012

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1949 » by gambitx777 » Mon Jan 19, 2026 2:52 am

9 and 20 wrote:Yeah, we're a bad landing spot for Zion. Send him somewhere more boring than DC - Portland, Denver, or OKC would fit. I could see the Lakers trying to get him at a discount. Zion in LA has some serious dark comedy or even dumb and dumber slapstick potential.
I mean soon and Luka both on the zempic lol hot damn.

Sent from my SM-S926U1 using RealGM mobile app
WallToWall
Veteran
Posts: 2,943
And1: 1,091
Joined: May 20, 2010
         

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1950 » by WallToWall » Mon Jan 19, 2026 4:29 am

So, Porzingis is suffering from tendinitis and has missed 6 games. That makes him a great trade candidate, given that he has an expiring contract. I would like to somehow pry away that Pelicans pick that the Hawks have. Getting two top 5 picks in this draft will be nice. Grizzlies want an expiring but servicable player. Hawks could want a replacement for Trae, and Ja fits the bill. So, this works in the trade checker.

Grizzlies get: Middleton + Risacher
Hawks get: Morant + Bagley
Wiz get: Porzingis + Pels pick
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 71,487
And1: 24,158
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1951 » by nate33 » Mon Jan 19, 2026 4:39 am

WallToWall wrote:So, Porzingis is suffering from tendinitis and has missed 6 games. That makes him a great trade candidate, given that he has an expiring contract. I would like to somehow pry away that Pelicans pick that the Hawks have. Getting two top 5 picks in this draft will be nice. Grizzlies want an expiring but servicable player. Hawks could want a replacement for Trae, and Ja fits the bill. So, this works in the trade checker.

Grizzlies get: Middleton + Risacher
Hawks get: Morant + Bagley
Wiz get: Porzingis + Pels pick


You think Atlanta is going to give up a potential top 5 pick in an extremely strong draft, plus Risacher for Morant?

And if they do, why are we getting the pick and not Memphis? We didn't do anything in this trade except swap out an expiring Middleton for an expiring Porzingis.
WallToWall
Veteran
Posts: 2,943
And1: 1,091
Joined: May 20, 2010
         

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1952 » by WallToWall » Mon Jan 19, 2026 5:10 am

nate33 wrote:
WallToWall wrote:So, Porzingis is suffering from tendinitis and has missed 6 games. That makes him a great trade candidate, given that he has an expiring contract. I would like to somehow pry away that Pelicans pick that the Hawks have. Getting two top 5 picks in this draft will be nice. Grizzlies want an expiring but servicable player. Hawks could want a replacement for Trae, and Ja fits the bill. So, this works in the trade checker.
Grizzlies get: Middleton + Risacher
Hawks get: Morant + Bagley
Wiz get: Porzingis + Pels pick


You think Atlanta is going to give up a potential top 5 pick in an extremely strong draft, plus Risacher for Morant?
And if they do, why are we getting the pick and not Memphis? We didn't do anything in this trade except swap out an expiring Middleton for an expiring Porzingis.

We are giving the Hawks a cheap servicable big, and we are making the trade work for all parties. The Griz certainly dont want a broken Porzingis and they want an expiring contract that just happens to be able to make for a reasonable backup, in return for Morant. Risacher is not doing so well with the Hawks, and could use a new start somewhere else. The Griz could take a chance on this former #1 pick. Its good return value for the Griz (Morant''s $40M contract for the next 3 yrs) in this current market.
ledell_gumbo
Ballboy
Posts: 28
And1: 24
Joined: Jul 09, 2025

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1953 » by ledell_gumbo » Mon Jan 19, 2026 6:12 am

WallToWall wrote:We are giving the Hawks a cheap servicable big, and we are making the trade work for all parties.


I'm sorry to say that this is ka-ra-zee. That pick is more valuable than the Wizards' own. The Hawks wouldn't trade it for Tre. They probably would for Sarr, but not definitely.
Northwest Roddy
Sophomore
Posts: 213
And1: 175
Joined: Apr 18, 2025
 

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1954 » by Northwest Roddy » Tue Jan 20, 2026 12:33 am

Happy MLK Jr. day to everyone!

Once a year, someone please post the Ted/MLK Jr. poster he put out to remind us all again who the top clown is in this clown car.
9 and 20
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,906
And1: 1,412
Joined: Mar 28, 2021
 

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1955 » by 9 and 20 » Tue Jan 20, 2026 2:12 am

Image

There is also a really good Leonsis glamour shot out there where he's flashing a Rolex but gives off serious Bond villian vibes. I couldn't find it, but when I googled Leonsis images, I came across a bunch of fat Ted photos. I forgot how portly the guy was just a few years ago.
Can't say I do. Who else gonna shoot?
GoneShammGone
Junior
Posts: 387
And1: 275
Joined: Nov 12, 2009

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1956 » by GoneShammGone » Tue Jan 20, 2026 2:55 am

9 and 20 wrote:Image

There is also a really good Leonsis glamour shot out there where he's flashing a Rolex but gives off serious Bond villian vibes. I couldn't find it, but when I googled Leonsis images, I came across a bunch of fat Ted photos. I forgot how portly the guy was just a few years ago.


Not even Elon ever did anything this narcissistic.
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,490
And1: 7,584
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1957 » by FAH1223 » Tue Jan 20, 2026 2:34 pm

Read on Twitter


Josh says a Zion trade is a long shot but the fact that league executives are talking about the Wizards potentially making a deal like that means the hunt for distressed assets is not over. Even better if they can play the 4.
Image
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 71,487
And1: 24,158
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1958 » by nate33 » Tue Jan 20, 2026 4:05 pm

FAH1223 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Josh says a Zion trade is a long shot but the fact that league executives are talking about the Wizards potentially making a deal like that means the hunt for distressed assets is not over. Even better if they can play the 4.

I'm surprised that the article didn't mention the Wizards' multiple TPE's and the likelihood that we will absorb a contract of a luxtax team. That seems like the most no-brainer move of all. If we absorb an expiring contract like Maxi Kleber, Lonzo Ball, or Yabusele, it won't even disrupt our future flexibility this summer.
Frichuela
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,917
And1: 3,930
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
 

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1959 » by Frichuela » Tue Jan 20, 2026 4:29 pm

nate33 wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Josh says a Zion trade is a long shot but the fact that league executives are talking about the Wizards potentially making a deal like that means the hunt for distressed assets is not over. Even better if they can play the 4.

I'm surprised that the article didn't mention the Wizards' multiple TPE's and the likelihood that we will absorb a contract of a luxtax team. That seems like the most no-brainer move of all. If we absorb an expiring contract like Maxi Kleber, Lonzo Ball, or Yabusele, it won't even disrupt our future flexibility this summer.


Agreed. Bering burdened with 2.5 years of Jerami Grant's contract is not an enticing prospect...
User avatar
nate33
Forum Mod - Wizards
Forum Mod - Wizards
Posts: 71,487
And1: 24,158
Joined: Oct 28, 2002

Re: Official Trade Thread Part XLVII 

Post#1960 » by nate33 » Tue Jan 20, 2026 4:38 pm

Frichuela wrote:
nate33 wrote:
FAH1223 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Josh says a Zion trade is a long shot but the fact that league executives are talking about the Wizards potentially making a deal like that means the hunt for distressed assets is not over. Even better if they can play the 4.

I'm surprised that the article didn't mention the Wizards' multiple TPE's and the likelihood that we will absorb a contract of a luxtax team. That seems like the most no-brainer move of all. If we absorb an expiring contract like Maxi Kleber, Lonzo Ball, or Yabusele, it won't even disrupt our future flexibility this summer.


Agreed. Bering burdened with 2.5 years of Jerami Grant's contract is not an enticing prospect...

Yes. Now that we are near the end of the "talent accumulation phase", I'm less enthusiastic about taking on bad long term salary for more future picks. We already have a lot of developing talent plus some surplus picks in the queue, and only so many minutes available to develop them. Once we are trying to win, I would feel better about spending our cap room on good youngish free agents to plug the talent gaps where we are weak rather than take on a long redundant contract for some unspecified mid first round pick in the distant future.

Give me Isaiah Hartenstein or Walker Kessler as the perfect complement to Sarr rather than Immanuel Quickley's $32.5M a year contract for 3.5 more years plus a 2031 FRP that will probably be in the teens.

Return to Washington Wizards