theonlyeastcoastrapsfan wrote:Spida888 wrote:Hopefully Poeltl's back isn't cooked but it's not looking promising at least for this season. I doubt the FO would have given him the extension if they knew that his back would be like this.
However, I do criticize them for not waiting until later into the season to potentially extend him. If I'm not mistaken, since Jak had a player option for next year, we had up until end of June 2026 to extend him (unlike RJ).
Was there some event where this happened that I missed, where it got crazy worse, because from what I read it is wasn’t a surprise, it had been an issue last year and they gave many different reasons for why he didn’t really even take part in preseason. His backs been the sam all season I believe. Lots of times this season where he’s played but was so limited he wasn’t himself and was hurting us. This is why I’m questioning the decision so much. It’d be one thing if I can recall an event or the game after we signed the guy where he got hurt. Thats just the way it goes, but just like I’d question the gm who takes Jak’s deal, if it’s not a new injury then what kind of risk assessment was done to ensure you were left holding the bag?
looking through his injury history he missed one game last year due to his back. That hardly seems like the same thing. Especially in a tanking season when injuries get creative. Like, your premise is correct that it would have been stupid to extend him knowing he'd miss most of the next season due to a back condition, but maybe think about how unrealistic that scenario is, and whether Bobby specifically seems like that stupid of a person.
I would say this was probably a coincidence, and an unfortunate one.






















