ImageImageImage

Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET)

Moderators: bisme37, canman1971, Darthlukey, Shak_Celts, Parliament10, shackles10, snowman, Froob

BillessuR6
General Manager
Posts: 8,825
And1: 2,682
Joined: Aug 15, 2004
 

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1541 » by BillessuR6 » Wed Jan 21, 2026 12:31 pm

Fierce1 wrote:
BillessuR6 wrote:Minott and a 2nd for Jock Landale

That's like the Muscala move in 2023.

Need something better.


Well, Landale is averaging 11 and 6 and shoting 39 % from 3. He is having a really good season and only making 2 mio, so would not add anything to the payroll. Muscala was nowhere near these numbers...

All "better" options have been discussed here.I doubt we go after someoone like JJJ who will make 50 mio next season. And is Gafford at 15+ mio that much better? His stats are worse and he does not spread the floor...
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 21,208
And1: 18,900
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1542 » by Fierce1 » Wed Jan 21, 2026 12:40 pm

BillessuR6 wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:
BillessuR6 wrote:Minott and a 2nd for Jock Landale

That's like the Muscala move in 2023.

Need something better.


Well, Landale is averaging 11 and 6 and shoting 39 % from 3. He is having a really good season and only making 2 mio, so would not add anything to the payroll. Muscala was nowhere near these numbers...

All "better" options have been discussed here.I doubt we go after someoone like JJJ who will make 50 mio next season. And is Gafford at 15+ mio that much better? His stats are worse and he does not spread the floor...

If it's Boucher and a 2nd round pick then I think that's a good deal for the Cs.
brackdan70
RealGM
Posts: 19,678
And1: 14,729
Joined: Jul 15, 2013
Location: Ogden, UT
   

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1543 » by brackdan70 » Wed Jan 21, 2026 1:18 pm

Fierce1 wrote:
BillessuR6 wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:That's like the Muscala move in 2023.

Need something better.


Well, Landale is averaging 11 and 6 and shoting 39 % from 3. He is having a really good season and only making 2 mio, so would not add anything to the payroll. Muscala was nowhere near these numbers...

All "better" options have been discussed here.I doubt we go after someoone like JJJ who will make 50 mio next season. And is Gafford at 15+ mio that much better? His stats are worse and he does not spread the floor...

If it's Boucher and a 2nd round pick then I think that's a good deal for the Cs.

Yeah despite him not getting PT, Minott is a better player and prospect than Londale. Boucher and a second sure. Why not. I hope we can do better.
Jordan Walsh goes top 10 in a 2023 redraft.
User avatar
GoCeltics123
RealGM
Posts: 17,660
And1: 33,778
Joined: May 05, 2015
         

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1544 » by GoCeltics123 » Wed Jan 21, 2026 1:51 pm

Horford coming back would be hilarious

"You could not live with your own failure, and where did that bring you? Back to me."

-Thanos
--Brad Stevens

Seriously though, why did he sign with the old man Warriors again? He should've gone to Denver
winsomme2
Rookie
Posts: 1,187
And1: 722
Joined: Jun 12, 2013

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1545 » by winsomme2 » Wed Jan 21, 2026 1:55 pm

I think it is getting clearer and clearer that we should have signed Kornet but I would also be in on a Big Al reunion. Especially if Brad can get GS to retain some of the salary.

It's such an easy fit and he's better than most of the options being discussed IMO

From bluemanhoop.com

"Horford has averaged 8.3 points, 5.1 rebounds, 2.0 assists and 1.2 blocks in the last 15 games, shooting an efficient 47.1% from the floor and 42.6% from 3-point range on over four attempts."

That's actually exactly what we would need. Plus you could bring back the double big lineups when needed.

I don't know if there's any bad blood there but if not, he's pretty high on my list of big man options.
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 21,208
And1: 18,900
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1546 » by Fierce1 » Wed Jan 21, 2026 2:05 pm

Getting Al Horford is not going to improve the Celtics.

We've already seen what he can do against guys like Mitchell Robinson and Jalen Duren.

Going back to old man basketball will only result in another playoff exit.

One of the the reasons why the Celtics are exceeding expectations this season is they got younger.
This season's Celtics can run, jump, and shoot.

The only thing that Al does now is shoot 3s.

Just look at the Warriors record with Steph, Jimmy, Dray, and Al.

Old man basketball does not work in today's NBA.
winsomme2
Rookie
Posts: 1,187
And1: 722
Joined: Jun 12, 2013

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1547 » by winsomme2 » Wed Jan 21, 2026 2:17 pm

Fierce1 wrote:Getting Al Horford is not going to improve the Celtics.

We've already seen what he can do against guys like Mitchell Robinson and Jalen Duren.

Going back to old man basketball will only result in another playoff exit.

One of the the reasons why the Celtics are exceeding expectations this season is they got younger.
This season's Celtics can run, jump, and shoot.

The only thing that Al does now is shoot 3s.

Just look at the Warriors record with Steph, Jimmy, Dray, and Al.

Old man basketball does not work in today's NBA.


I disagree Fierce. Big Al is better than Garza IMO so in that respect he helps us get better. He's a better paint defender, he's a better defensive rebounder, and a better shooter. I hear what you're saying about the youth movement but Big Al won't limit time for Walsh or Hugo.

Also keeping Simons is getting more and more important to me and this would be a move that would allow Brad to keep him without adding too much salary.

I honestly think that if we had Simons last year we don't lose those first two games to the Knicks.

This wouldn't be old man ball.

PP
DWhite
JB
Tatum
Queta

Simons
Hauser
Walsh
Big Al

Hugo
Scheierman
Garza
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 21,208
And1: 18,900
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1548 » by Fierce1 » Wed Jan 21, 2026 2:30 pm

winsomme2 wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:Getting Al Horford is not going to improve the Celtics.

We've already seen what he can do against guys like Mitchell Robinson and Jalen Duren.

Going back to old man basketball will only result in another playoff exit.

One of the the reasons why the Celtics are exceeding expectations this season is they got younger.
This season's Celtics can run, jump, and shoot.

The only thing that Al does now is shoot 3s.

Just look at the Warriors record with Steph, Jimmy, Dray, and Al.

Old man basketball does not work in today's NBA.


I disagree Fierce. Big Al is better than Garza IMO so in that respect he helps us get better. He's a better paint defender, he's a better defensive rebounder, and a better shooter. I hear what you're saying about the youth movement but Big Al won't limit time for Walsh or Hugo.

Also keeping Simons is getting more and more important to me and this would be a move that would allow Brad to keep him without adding too much salary.

I honestly think that if we had Simons last year we don't lose those first two games to the Knicks.

This wouldn't be old man ball.

PP
DWhite
JB
Tatum
Queta

Simons
Hauser
Walsh
Big Al

Hugo
Scheierman
Garza

The problem with that is you set the bar low.

You can argue he's better than Garza.
But that's not what we need right now.

What the Celtics need is someone better than Garza and Queta.

Even Jock Landale is better than Al and Landale is cheaper than Al.

All of us Celtic fans have seen how the Mitchell Robinson dominated the Celtics last playoffs.
Al Horford is useless against guys like Mitchell and Duren.

The bar should be set higher.
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,329
And1: 15,249
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1549 » by 165bows » Wed Jan 21, 2026 2:45 pm

Fierce1 wrote:Getting Al Horford is not going to improve the Celtics.

We've already seen what he can do against guys like Mitchell Robinson and Jalen Duren.

Going back to old man basketball will only result in another playoff exit.

One of the the reasons why the Celtics are exceeding expectations this season is they got younger.
This season's Celtics can run, jump, and shoot.

The only thing that Al does now is shoot 3s.

Just look at the Warriors record with Steph, Jimmy, Dray, and Al.

Old man basketball does not work in today's NBA.

I definitely think this concern is valid otoh they aren't looking at him as a full time starter anymore. Queta has shown he can keep this team really competitive and will take the bulk of the minutes. Adding Al to take 10-15 minutes a night as an option is a plus.

And on the Warriors Al started unreal cold but as posted above has picked up and so did the team, - they were 12-5 over their last 17 with Al playing ~15 minutes a night and hitting threes every night.

I really have no issue bring in two big men the more the merrier as long as they can play.
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 21,208
And1: 18,900
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1550 » by Fierce1 » Wed Jan 21, 2026 2:50 pm

165bows wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:Getting Al Horford is not going to improve the Celtics.

We've already seen what he can do against guys like Mitchell Robinson and Jalen Duren.

Going back to old man basketball will only result in another playoff exit.

One of the the reasons why the Celtics are exceeding expectations this season is they got younger.
This season's Celtics can run, jump, and shoot.

The only thing that Al does now is shoot 3s.

Just look at the Warriors record with Steph, Jimmy, Dray, and Al.

Old man basketball does not work in today's NBA.

I definitely think this concern is valid otoh they aren't looking at him as a full time starter anymore. Queta has shown he can keep this team really competitive and will take the bulk of the minutes. Adding Al to take 10-15 minutes a night as an option is a plus.

And on the Warriors Al started unreal cold but as posted above has picked up and so did the team, - they were 12-5 over their last 17 with Al playing ~15 minutes a night and hitting threes every night.

I really have no issue bring in two big men the more the merrier as long as they can play.

You really believe Al is going to sit on the bench in the last 5 minutes of a playoff game?
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,329
And1: 15,249
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1551 » by 165bows » Wed Jan 21, 2026 2:50 pm

165bows wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:
fallguy wrote:
I would kill for an **** on this team. Someone with a really nasty physical edge.

Get someone to fit in between Queta and Garza and I'm happy. Something that got lost in yesterday's game was Queta had an excellent game last night 10 points, 8 rebounds, 3 steals, 1 block in 28 minutes and the Celtics were +15 in his minutes, a team high. Celtics just need one more guy.


If they don't make a bigger move:

Jock Landale
Horford
Sharpe
Kevon Looney (maybe)
Rob Will (as a buyout)

Edit: I'm also still interested in a flier on Karlo Matkovic to fill in as the 6th center alongside Boucher. Can never have too many big men!


According to the Magic fan(s) on the trade board they may move a big to replace them with a cheaper one to avoid the tax, so add Carter Jr to the list above and/or M. Wagner (seems less likely).
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 21,208
And1: 18,900
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1552 » by Fierce1 » Wed Jan 21, 2026 2:52 pm

If Carter Jr. can be had then he's a better option than Sharpe, Landale, Gafford, and Al.

Just stay away from Al.
shi-woo
Veteran
Posts: 2,626
And1: 4,190
Joined: Jun 17, 2018
     

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1553 » by shi-woo » Wed Jan 21, 2026 2:57 pm

I know we are all fascinated with getting another center, but does anyone else feel like we need more offense? I know I know Tatum coming back and all that jazz, but I don't expect that, not this season at least. When I look at this team as the season goes on, it's clear we just don't have the juice, and White is honestly drowning as a 2nd option. It's been bad since opening tip for him, and o'm not fooled by our off. ranking. We will get smothered in the playoffs.

I would like to add another offensive option, and wouldn't be surprised if Brad is thinking the same. If/when Tatum comes back, he can give us some help in our limited minutes, and that opens up the door for Walsh, Minott, Hauser, Baylor, and others to get traded too. Bill talked about Pritchard losing minutes to Tatum too the other day, and that also makes sense to me even if I think this team having 2 tempo ball movers in the lineup is the reason the offense has been great.

They mentioned Monk on that pod, and i'm okay with that, he's a better defender than Simons, and is on an okay deal.

Someone like Saddiq Bey could give us more offense, and he's on a real nice team friendly deal through next year for 6 mil. Bey and Missi for Hauser and our 1st or give Pels back their 2nd makes a ton of sense to me.

I'd kick the tires and see if DEN is willing to sell low on their young guys. They brought in a ton a vets, and dudes got pushed out of rotations, but Holmes, Strawther, and Pickett all look available, and all have promise. Strawther last year was solid, and i've always liked Holmes. Bringing Strawther in for Tillman and the Pels pick honestly doesn't seem that bad, and would give us another offensive option while not trading the farm. Bouche and that 2nd for Pickett also works, and both trades give them more big man insurance this year, and a very solid pick to replace the player. We obviously get younger and a piece that can actually play.

This year is going to be weird, I keep scouring the trade machine as the season/narratives change, and nothing makes sense outside of the Nets/Grizz. Even with the Warriors down and out their is literally nothing on that roster that works or we could trade for except TJD. Same with MIL, WAS, and most other teams you would think would move on from guys. If Sharpe isn't there, the more and more this looks like a resign Simons, and trade Hauser and a pick at the draft type of year.

Some GM is going have to get robbed if they get too overzealous, and there just aren't that many bad GM's in the association now. The only two teams that can really overpay for something are OKC and SAS, which is wild to think about.
User avatar
Fierce1
RealGM
Posts: 21,208
And1: 18,900
Joined: Jan 31, 2021
   

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1554 » by Fierce1 » Wed Jan 21, 2026 3:02 pm

DWhite will be better when Tatum returns.

Right now White is having a hard time handling the load of a #2 option.

Once Tatum returns, White will be back to being the 3rd option.
That means more open shots.
celtxman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,916
And1: 2,062
Joined: Aug 21, 2004
   

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1555 » by celtxman » Wed Jan 21, 2026 3:30 pm

Fierce1 wrote:DWhite will be better when Tatum returns.

Right now White is having a hard time handling the load of a #2 option.

Once Tatum returns, White will be back to being the 3rd option.
That means more open shots.

.....and not feeling he has to force bad shots. We used to love his efficiency.
Brad Stevens on fans who want the Celtics to tank: "I don’t think they’ll like me all that much then."
User avatar
Higgs Boston
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,929
And1: 2,703
Joined: Feb 25, 2014

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1556 » by Higgs Boston » Wed Jan 21, 2026 4:06 pm

White isn't good enough to be the clear 3rd option in a contender like it was obvious before and after getting holiday and porzingis, the team needs a big guard or a wing that can handle and pass a bit that is at least a borderline allstar and compete with White to be the 3 best player on the team.

Celtics can't replace Holiday with bench players like pritchard and hauser or expect young players like walsh and hugo to reach that level like it was nothing.
winsomme2
Rookie
Posts: 1,187
And1: 722
Joined: Jun 12, 2013

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1557 » by winsomme2 » Wed Jan 21, 2026 4:09 pm

Fierce1 wrote:
winsomme2 wrote:
Fierce1 wrote:Getting Al Horford is not going to improve the Celtics.

We've already seen what he can do against guys like Mitchell Robinson and Jalen Duren.

Going back to old man basketball will only result in another playoff exit.

One of the the reasons why the Celtics are exceeding expectations this season is they got younger.
This season's Celtics can run, jump, and shoot.

The only thing that Al does now is shoot 3s.

Just look at the Warriors record with Steph, Jimmy, Dray, and Al.

Old man basketball does not work in today's NBA.


I disagree Fierce. Big Al is better than Garza IMO so in that respect he helps us get better. He's a better paint defender, he's a better defensive rebounder, and a better shooter. I hear what you're saying about the youth movement but Big Al won't limit time for Walsh or Hugo.

Also keeping Simons is getting more and more important to me and this would be a move that would allow Brad to keep him without adding too much salary.

I honestly think that if we had Simons last year we don't lose those first two games to the Knicks.

This wouldn't be old man ball.

PP
DWhite
JB
Tatum
Queta

Simons
Hauser
Walsh
Big Al

Hugo
Scheierman
Garza

The problem with that is you set the bar low.

You can argue he's better than Garza.
But that's not what we need right now.

What the Celtics need is someone better than Garza and Queta.

Even Jock Landale is better than Al and Landale is cheaper than Al.

All of us Celtic fans have seen how the Mitchell Robinson dominated the Celtics last playoffs.
Al Horford is useless against guys like Mitchell and Duren.

The bar should be set higher.


I’ll admit I don’t know much about Landale but I find it hard to believe we’re gonna get someone better than Queta without giving up Simons or Hauser (which I would not want to happen).

If that move is out there, then I will gladly jump on board but my goal rn is getting someone better than Garza at defending the paint/rim without losing our bench scoring…
User avatar
165bows
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,329
And1: 15,249
Joined: Jan 03, 2013
Location: The land of incremental improvement.

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1558 » by 165bows » Wed Jan 21, 2026 4:15 pm

They def need more offense but that is what Tatum is for. But he adds a ton more offense while making everyone else better, adding size, defense, depth, versatility, rebounding etc etc. which the rest of these guys (including Simons) don't do.

But they are definitely focused on offense and that influences the types of bigs they look at no doubt.
User avatar
Larry_Russell
RealGM
Posts: 12,146
And1: 6,232
Joined: Jun 23, 2021

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1559 » by Larry_Russell » Wed Jan 21, 2026 4:20 pm

Higgs Boston wrote:White isn't good enough to be the clear 3rd option in a contender like it was obvious before and after getting holiday and porzingis, the team needs a big guard or a wing that can handle and pass a bit that is at least a borderline allstar and compete with White to be the 3 best player on the team.

Celtics can't replace Holiday with bench players like pritchard and hauser or expect young players like walsh and hugo to reach that level like it was nothing.



thats a weird take when we won a title with White as the 3rd option
User avatar
Higgs Boston
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,929
And1: 2,703
Joined: Feb 25, 2014

Re: Free Agent/Trade/Waiver Thread, 2025-26, pt 3 – (Trade Deadline = Thurs, Feb. 5, 3pm, ET) 

Post#1560 » by Higgs Boston » Wed Jan 21, 2026 4:23 pm

Larry_Russell wrote:
Higgs Boston wrote:White isn't good enough to be the clear 3rd option in a contender like it was obvious before and after getting holiday and porzingis, the team needs a big guard or a wing that can handle and pass a bit that is at least a borderline allstar and compete with White to be the 3 best player on the team.

Celtics can't replace Holiday with bench players like pritchard and hauser or expect young players like walsh and hugo to reach that level like it was nothing.



thats a weird take when we won a title with White as the 3rd option


Celtics won with White and Holiday competing to be the 3 best player, White wasn't the clear 3 best player that is the point.

Return to Boston Celtics