Tor_Raps wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:mihaic wrote:He provides the 20+ points almost every game. The only thing I don't like in his game is sometimes he turns the ball over predictably.
He also provides 20+ points on meh efficiency.
We need his skill set, but he’s been far from great.
The argument was whether hes been great, its whether him and Barnes have clearly been the 2 best players on the team. In no way has IQ been close to Ingram in terms of overall impact this season.
Just like Demar used to take slander, there are guys on the team required to do what they do. They are often given grenade type shots all throughout the game and especially when defenses get tight at the end of games where very few are able to get off their shots.
Yeah but Demar also was proven to kind of not be all that valuable either. We benched him late in games in playoff series', traded him and won a ring, then lost the guys we traded him for, and still won 60+ games.
Ingram is very similar. He is fine. But he is not great.
I'd say there is a reasonable argument to be made that Ingram/Barnes/RJ/Quick have all been very close in impact this year (with Barnes obviously leading the pack). They all have such different strengths and weaknesses and actually compliment each other quite well. But Ingram is given a lot of grenade shots, but Ingram also takes a lot of unnecessary grenades (just like Demar did).