PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
Moderators: GONYK, j4remi, NoLayupRule, Deeeez Knicks, Jeff Van Gully, mpharris36, dakomish23, HerSports85
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
- Fat Kat
- RealGM
- Posts: 36,947
- And1: 40,329
- Joined: Apr 19, 2004
-
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
- rajajackal
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,848
- And1: 11,956
- Joined: Nov 04, 2013
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
- JXL
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,487
- And1: 12,675
- Joined: Sep 01, 2013
- Location: New York
- Contact:
-
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
rajajackal wrote:?s=20
A reminder: It's not about the record, as long as the Knicks stay top 3 and be healthy for the playoffs.
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
- prophet_of_rage
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,520
- And1: 7,671
- Joined: Jan 06, 2005
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
We lost to a tanking team that wanted smoke with us.Fat Kat wrote:
Sent from my SM-S938W using RealGM mobile app
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
- rajajackal
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,848
- And1: 11,956
- Joined: Nov 04, 2013
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
JXL wrote:rajajackal wrote:?s=20
A reminder: It's not about the record, as long as the Knicks stay top 3 and be healthy for the playoffs.
we were healthier last year besides mitch still recovering from the embiid injury
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
-
whocares1
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,132
- And1: 6,270
- Joined: Oct 31, 2014
-
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
NiceLikeChrist wrote:JXL wrote:Can't believe the guy who likes being a troll is telling off the idiots who didn't watch last night (including some on this forum)
Bad tweet and terrible analysis. Is that guy an analyst? Like this is his job?
Brunson took 5 jumpers in the last 3 minutes of regulation. All bricks, all short. His only bucket was a layup 1:31 left
3:18: pull up 3 - 10 seconds on the clock. No play, just staring right at nesmith's face and putting it up
2:06: Turn around jumper - 17 seconds left on the shot clock, no play, running up the floor going at jackson 1 on 1
1:02: pull up 3 - 6 seconds on the clock, again just staring at nesmith right in front of him and pulling up
0:34: pull up jumper - 17 seconds on the clock, rejects the screen and just pulls up from mid, good contest by nesmith
0:11: catch and shoot 3 - probably the best look out of all of them and it came off an inbounds play
KAT barely touched the ball, mikal barely touched the ball. It is what it is. Anyone trying to sit there acting like JB decision making down the stretch wasn't suspect last night is part of the problem and the reason why JB continues to do this type of stuff.
Pacers played man for a reason. They know Brunson is the only creator on offense. They rather let Nesmith defend him in iso over sending doubles and creating open shots. Brunson is an elite scorer in isolation they just happen to have a guy that can defend him well.
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
- JXL
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,487
- And1: 12,675
- Joined: Sep 01, 2013
- Location: New York
- Contact:
-
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
rajajackal wrote:JXL wrote:rajajackal wrote:?s=20
A reminder: It's not about the record, as long as the Knicks stay top 3 and be healthy for the playoffs.
we were healthier last year besides mitch still recovering from the embiid injury
I'm saying don't get worked up on the regular season but make sure they get to the big dance healthy when it matters the most.
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
- rajajackal
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,848
- And1: 11,956
- Joined: Nov 04, 2013
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
JXL wrote:rajajackal wrote:JXL wrote:
A reminder: It's not about the record, as long as the Knicks stay top 3 and be healthy for the playoffs.
we were healthier last year besides mitch still recovering from the embiid injury
I'm saying don't get worked up on the regular season but make sure they get to the big dance healthy when it matters the most.
for sure, verdict is out until we see what happens in the postseason. but i lament that we show very little competitive edge even when we're firing on all cylinders and looking elite. i'd trade longer rotations to get that back any day
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
- Capn'O
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 95,088
- And1: 118,963
- Joined: Dec 16, 2005
- Location: Let's stop and get a hot dog
-
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
BAF Clippers
PG: Brunson/Philon
SG: Black/Klay
SF: Jaquez/Riley
PF: Kuminga/
C: Kornet/Yanic
Craig Porter | Hugo

PG: Brunson/Philon
SG: Black/Klay
SF: Jaquez/Riley
PF: Kuminga/
C: Kornet/Yanic
Craig Porter | Hugo
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
- Capn'O
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 95,088
- And1: 118,963
- Joined: Dec 16, 2005
- Location: Let's stop and get a hot dog
-
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
prophet_of_rage wrote:We lost to a tanking team that wanted smoke with us.Fat Kat wrote:
Sent from my SM-S938W using RealGM mobile app
While we looked ahead. Shoulda taken the Pacers seriously. Ah well, hope we get this one.
BAF Clippers
PG: Brunson/Philon
SG: Black/Klay
SF: Jaquez/Riley
PF: Kuminga/
C: Kornet/Yanic
Craig Porter | Hugo

PG: Brunson/Philon
SG: Black/Klay
SF: Jaquez/Riley
PF: Kuminga/
C: Kornet/Yanic
Craig Porter | Hugo
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
- Meat
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,498
- And1: 5,309
- Joined: Jun 30, 2013
-
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
FrozenEnvelope wrote:Meat wrote:FrozenEnvelope wrote:I gotta be honest I have no confidence this team is making the ECF. We still got 30 something games left but I haven't liked the DNA of this years team. We are 'Duncan Robinson' aka soft and timid. You don't see that hunger and toughness. Just look at the postgame interviews. These players don't even look like they care. Heck, we the fans show more of a pulse! They can't wait to swap jerseys and gossip with the opposing players after losses all smiling and ****!
HC Brown has done some good things and a 34-20 record is alright but considering the expectations coming into the season, I cannot say with a straight face that expectations have been reached. We are that student that barely passed the midterm.
Also losing faith in JB. I think we try to fool ourselves into hoping he is that elite level player and leader but I think maybe he's just a Robin and we still do not have a Batman.
With 100% certainly, the knicks will go as far as Robinsons health will allow. They easily beat the pacers last night if he played
Mitch can defend all 5 players on defense and prevent 3s?![]()
Last night loss was on HC Brown and JB. I don't think Mitch helps in games where nobody is motivated enough to play defense and are more concerned about their podcasts.
the knicks get more than 8 offensive rebounds if mitch plays last night, hell he gets 8 on his own. that's enough to win the game. Mitch isnt -17 like diawara/huck were
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
- F N 11
- RealGM
- Posts: 97,545
- And1: 70,652
- Joined: Jun 27, 2006
- Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
- Contact:
-
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
Fat Kat wrote:
I was wondering why my girl was saying nets beat pacers. I was like what that gotta do with me. I get it now smh.
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
-
Jalen Bluntson
- Banned User
- Posts: 27,461
- And1: 29,733
- Joined: Nov 07, 2012
Re: PG: Knicks vs. Pacers: Gross
F N 11 wrote:Fat Kat wrote:
I was wondering why my girl was saying nets beat pacers. I was like what that gotta do with me. I get it now smh.
Wild. I just saw this
?s=20
Blatant tank that only steps up when they want to. They are not as bad as their record suggests.












