wco81 wrote:Do any of the small guards in this 2026 draft class have the ability to go downhill like Edgecomb or Harper from the 2025 draft class.
Made a plot just for this

Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831
wco81 wrote:Do any of the small guards in this 2026 draft class have the ability to go downhill like Edgecomb or Harper from the 2025 draft class.

CptCrunch wrote:wco81 wrote:Do any of the small guards in this 2026 draft class have the ability to go downhill like Edgecomb or Harper from the 2025 draft class.
Made a plot just for this
SeattleJazzFan wrote:CptCrunch wrote:wco81 wrote:Do any of the small guards in this 2026 draft class have the ability to go downhill like Edgecomb or Harper from the 2025 draft class.
Made a plot just for this
my guess is if you made one for vj at baylor it wouldn't look that great in terms of his being a "downhill" player.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
babyjax13 wrote:This draft is getting alarmingly thin after about 25 because of NIL. Super interesting dynamic. Sounds like Morez Johnson could also return to school - at a certain point some guys are going to realize they can get drafted this year and future years will be deeper.
Cammo101 wrote:babyjax13 wrote:This draft is getting alarmingly thin after about 25 because of NIL. Super interesting dynamic. Sounds like Morez Johnson could also return to school - at a certain point some guys are going to realize they can get drafted this year and future years will be deeper.
This will be a thing every year until they put some guardrails on NIL. It just isn't worth the risk if you aren't guaranteed to go in the top 20 or so.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
babyjax13 wrote:Cammo101 wrote:babyjax13 wrote:This draft is getting alarmingly thin after about 25 because of NIL. Super interesting dynamic. Sounds like Morez Johnson could also return to school - at a certain point some guys are going to realize they can get drafted this year and future years will be deeper.
This will be a thing every year until they put some guardrails on NIL. It just isn't worth the risk if you aren't guaranteed to go in the top 20 or so.
At a certain point there will be enough players that stayed till their senior year that the draft will get deep (probably overly so) and then normalize. Maybe next year or the year after. But right now it has thinned things out more than usual.
babyjax13 wrote:Cammo101 wrote:babyjax13 wrote:This draft is getting alarmingly thin after about 25 because of NIL. Super interesting dynamic. Sounds like Morez Johnson could also return to school - at a certain point some guys are going to realize they can get drafted this year and future years will be deeper.
This will be a thing every year until they put some guardrails on NIL. It just isn't worth the risk if you aren't guaranteed to go in the top 20 or so.
At a certain point there will be enough players that stayed till their senior year that the draft will get deep (probably overly so) and then normalize. Maybe next year or the year after. But right now it has thinned things out more than usual.
CptCrunch wrote:babyjax13 wrote:Cammo101 wrote:
This will be a thing every year until they put some guardrails on NIL. It just isn't worth the risk if you aren't guaranteed to go in the top 20 or so.
At a certain point there will be enough players that stayed till their senior year that the draft will get deep (probably overly so) and then normalize. Maybe next year or the year after. But right now it has thinned things out more than usual.
That's a good point. Two assumptions
1) The number of NBA prospect per year is constant
2) There is roughly an equal number of risers and fallers with each passing season for players who return to school.
If both are true, then number of prospects will equilibrate with time. We are effectively on year one of a situation where NBA draftees are skipping the draft to play in college for more money. This will lead to some deeper draft situations like the previous era, but one and done superstars will not stay in college for 4 years like Duncan.
This is a strong draft because of the top, but the depth is all time bad after the 20's.
ReggiesKnicks wrote:CptCrunch wrote:babyjax13 wrote:At a certain point there will be enough players that stayed till their senior year that the draft will get deep (probably overly so) and then normalize. Maybe next year or the year after. But right now it has thinned things out more than usual.
That's a good point. Two assumptions
1) The number of NBA prospect per year is constant
2) There is roughly an equal number of risers and fallers with each passing season for players who return to school.
If both are true, then number of prospects will equilibrate with time. We are effectively on year one of a situation where NBA draftees are skipping the draft to play in college for more money. This will lead to some deeper draft situations like the previous era, but one and done superstars will not stay in college for 4 years like Duncan.
This is a strong draft because of the top, but the depth is all time bad after the 20's.
I disagree with these assumptions.
NIL is attracting top-tier European prospects to college basketball. That's going to increase the number of Euro prospects we see, which should, in theory, increase the number of prospects.
ReggiesKnicks wrote:CptCrunch wrote:babyjax13 wrote:At a certain point there will be enough players that stayed till their senior year that the draft will get deep (probably overly so) and then normalize. Maybe next year or the year after. But right now it has thinned things out more than usual.
That's a good point. Two assumptions
1) The number of NBA prospect per year is constant
2) There is roughly an equal number of risers and fallers with each passing season for players who return to school.
If both are true, then number of prospects will equilibrate with time. We are effectively on year one of a situation where NBA draftees are skipping the draft to play in college for more money. This will lead to some deeper draft situations like the previous era, but one and done superstars will not stay in college for 4 years like Duncan.
This is a strong draft because of the top, but the depth is all time bad after the 20's.
I disagree with these assumptions.
NIL is attracting top-tier European prospects to college basketball. That's going to increase the number of Euro prospects we see, which should, in theory, increase the number of prospects.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
babyjax13 wrote:ReggiesKnicks wrote:CptCrunch wrote:
That's a good point. Two assumptions
1) The number of NBA prospect per year is constant
2) There is roughly an equal number of risers and fallers with each passing season for players who return to school.
If both are true, then number of prospects will equilibrate with time. We are effectively on year one of a situation where NBA draftees are skipping the draft to play in college for more money. This will lead to some deeper draft situations like the previous era, but one and done superstars will not stay in college for 4 years like Duncan.
This is a strong draft because of the top, but the depth is all time bad after the 20's.
I disagree with these assumptions.
NIL is attracting top-tier European prospects to college basketball. That's going to increase the number of Euro prospects we see, which should, in theory, increase the number of prospects.
I don't think it increases the supply of European prospects, it just changes where they play. Could be wrong, though, maybe more will consider the NBA after coming to college.
CptCrunch wrote:Anyone who is good enough to be drafted in late first, early second is prime candidate for a dominant college season. NIL is really gonna change the dynamics of the NBA draft. I do like the idea of college players getting paid for their labor, but this system makes a farce out of the college aspect of 'college' basketball.
Players are just transferring willy nilly between schools with no consideration for academics. At this point, might as well just skip the sham classes with tutors doing all the schoolwork. I respect Fr or So transferring, but anyone who has gone to a real school knows that you can't really transfers after Jr or Sr year; academics and credits just don't work like that.
BlazersBroncos wrote:My hot take is that Mor Massamba Diop has a chance to be the Hansen Yang of this draft. Proj 31-45 type that finds his way into the 15-20 or so range.