Cameron Boozer

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831

prime1time
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 3,109
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#861 » by prime1time » Mon May 18, 2026 3:33 pm

I think the concern for Boozer has to be whether or not he can be a #1 scoring option. Like what does Boozer do against a player like Gobert? Or Wemby? Or Jalen Duren? Or Wendell Carter? Do we really see Boozer pushing these guys around? John Hollinger has Boozer at #1 on his board.

1. Cameron Boozer, freshman, 6-9, PF/C, Duke
Yes, Boozer.

Similar to Cooper Flagg a year earlier, Boozer both destroyed college basketball and, at 18 years old, is the youngest college prospect in the draft. That he isn’t obviously the No. 1 pick at this point is a tell on the strength of this class, but I also wonder if everyone is overthinking things a bit.

Yes, some weaknesses jump out when you watch Boozer. He struggles to elevate and finish against length around the rim, something that stood out when Virginia’s Ugonna Onyenso repeatedly blocked his shot in the ACC championship game. Yes, Boozer’s ability as a rim protector is suspect, to say the least, with a minuscule 0.9 percent block rate in conference games. Finally, at 6 feet 9 and 250 pounds, he’s undersized for a center but may not have the mobility to play power forward.

The reason you take him No. 1 anyway is that Boozer was basically “college basketball Nikola Jokić” last season. He’s a huge, wide big man who nonetheless can handle on the perimeter and shoot 3s (39.1 percent from distance, 78.9 percent from the line). Duke ran inverted pick-and-rolls for him last season, where he was picking out 3-point shooters on the weak side and flicking one-handed crosscourt passes. As a rule, teenage centers do not do this, and when they do, they turn out to be pretty special.

That, basically, is my elevator pitch for Boozer as the top pick: Don’t worry about the defense, because the offense is going to be ridiculous. Pairing him with a mobile shot-blocker will be important, but Boozer’s resume is overwhelming.

I’ll throw in a few other Boozer nuggets while I’m here. First of all, his feel at the defensive end is pretty strong too; he averaged 2.8 steals per 100 possessions in conference play, which a lot of first-round guards didn’t do.

But let’s get back to that passing, because that to me is the ultimate reason to take him. I have a basic draft theory that I call the Marc Gasol Rule: Bigs who can pass, figure it out. Gasol was thought to be so vulnerable on defense that the Grizzlies drafted Hasheem Thabeet to play next to him. Gasol ended up winning a Defensive Player of the Year trophy. So much of big-man defense is reading what’s happening and figuring out position and angles. That’s why a lot of “feel” bigs like Gasol (or Jokić!) end up being solid-to-good defenders even with meh tools.

Boozer is only 6-9, so he’s operating with a different ceiling, and ultimately, he may play a lot at power forward. But he showed enough mobility that I don’t think he’d be a disaster at that spot defensively, and he’d have massive advantages at the other end if matched up that way.

In the end, it’s hard not to see a Kevin Love-type impact as a median outcome for Boozer, but he was so dominant at such a young age that there may be upside for more.


He basically says the offense outweighs the defense. Ok. But how good is offense? Is it most secondary scorer good passer? Or primary scorer good passer? I don't buy the high end upside on Boozer's scoring. I buy his passing, but you still would need to find a primary scorer who's not bad defensively and a rim protector who could ideally space the floor. I'm concerned about his switchability, I'm concerned about his rim protection, I'm concerned about his potential to be a primary scorer. He's a very good player who doesn't easily fit into building a winning team. Boozer's best fit is for teams that already have a two way primary scorer. Like Cade or Ant or Flagg.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 15,149
And1: 7,392
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#862 » by JMAC3 » Mon May 18, 2026 3:44 pm

prime1time wrote:I think the concern for Boozer has to be whether or not he can be a #1 scoring option. Like what does Boozer do against a player like Gobert? Or Wemby? Or Jalen Duren? Or Wendell Carter? Do we really see Boozer pushing these guys around? John Hollinger has Boozer at #1 on his board.

1. Cameron Boozer, freshman, 6-9, PF/C, Duke
Yes, Boozer.

Similar to Cooper Flagg a year earlier, Boozer both destroyed college basketball and, at 18 years old, is the youngest college prospect in the draft. That he isn’t obviously the No. 1 pick at this point is a tell on the strength of this class, but I also wonder if everyone is overthinking things a bit.

Yes, some weaknesses jump out when you watch Boozer. He struggles to elevate and finish against length around the rim, something that stood out when Virginia’s Ugonna Onyenso repeatedly blocked his shot in the ACC championship game. Yes, Boozer’s ability as a rim protector is suspect, to say the least, with a minuscule 0.9 percent block rate in conference games. Finally, at 6 feet 9 and 250 pounds, he’s undersized for a center but may not have the mobility to play power forward.

The reason you take him No. 1 anyway is that Boozer was basically “college basketball Nikola Jokić” last season. He’s a huge, wide big man who nonetheless can handle on the perimeter and shoot 3s (39.1 percent from distance, 78.9 percent from the line). Duke ran inverted pick-and-rolls for him last season, where he was picking out 3-point shooters on the weak side and flicking one-handed crosscourt passes. As a rule, teenage centers do not do this, and when they do, they turn out to be pretty special.

That, basically, is my elevator pitch for Boozer as the top pick: Don’t worry about the defense, because the offense is going to be ridiculous. Pairing him with a mobile shot-blocker will be important, but Boozer’s resume is overwhelming.

I’ll throw in a few other Boozer nuggets while I’m here. First of all, his feel at the defensive end is pretty strong too; he averaged 2.8 steals per 100 possessions in conference play, which a lot of first-round guards didn’t do.

But let’s get back to that passing, because that to me is the ultimate reason to take him. I have a basic draft theory that I call the Marc Gasol Rule: Bigs who can pass, figure it out. Gasol was thought to be so vulnerable on defense that the Grizzlies drafted Hasheem Thabeet to play next to him. Gasol ended up winning a Defensive Player of the Year trophy. So much of big-man defense is reading what’s happening and figuring out position and angles. That’s why a lot of “feel” bigs like Gasol (or Jokić!) end up being solid-to-good defenders even with meh tools.

Boozer is only 6-9, so he’s operating with a different ceiling, and ultimately, he may play a lot at power forward. But he showed enough mobility that I don’t think he’d be a disaster at that spot defensively, and he’d have massive advantages at the other end if matched up that way.

In the end, it’s hard not to see a Kevin Love-type impact as a median outcome for Boozer, but he was so dominant at such a young age that there may be upside for more.


He basically says the offense outweighs the defense. Ok. But how good is offense? Is it most secondary scorer good passer? Or primary scorer good passer? I don't buy the high end upside on Boozer's scoring. I buy his passing, but you still would need to find a primary scorer who's not bad defensively and a rim protector who could ideally space the floor. I'm concerned about his switchability, I'm concerned about his rim protection, I'm concerned about his potential to be a primary scorer. He's a very good player who doesn't easily fit into building a winning team. Boozer's best fit is for teams that already have a two way primary scorer. Like Cade or Ant or Flagg.


I don't think the rim protector next to him has to space the floor at all. Boozer projects as a plus shooter, you could play next to any rim runner big like Gafford, Gobert, whoever... I actually think he fits into most teams pretty flawlessly because he is a good floor spacer at the 4, good rebounder and has good size- that is basically the modern NBA 4 man. Could be awesome 2nd or 3rd option like a Kevin Love or Karl Anthony Towns.

Where I have my doubts is that he will be good enough ball handler to play like a Paolo or Jalen Johnson where he is trying to get downhill from perimeter vs mismatches. He mostly played back to back basket in college and overpowered smaller players- his drives per game were few and far between and that is vs college defenders, not #1 option defenders. He has good size, but he will be nothing special in the NBA where guys longer, taller, more athletic will be guarding him on the regular.

I still think he is a top 3 asset in this draft because with his IQ and Skill he will be a good player, just not sold he is a special player vs NBA talent.
prime1time
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 3,109
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#863 » by prime1time » Mon May 18, 2026 3:54 pm

JMAC3 wrote:
prime1time wrote:I think the concern for Boozer has to be whether or not he can be a #1 scoring option. Like what does Boozer do against a player like Gobert? Or Wemby? Or Jalen Duren? Or Wendell Carter? Do we really see Boozer pushing these guys around? John Hollinger has Boozer at #1 on his board.

1. Cameron Boozer, freshman, 6-9, PF/C, Duke
Yes, Boozer.

Similar to Cooper Flagg a year earlier, Boozer both destroyed college basketball and, at 18 years old, is the youngest college prospect in the draft. That he isn’t obviously the No. 1 pick at this point is a tell on the strength of this class, but I also wonder if everyone is overthinking things a bit.

Yes, some weaknesses jump out when you watch Boozer. He struggles to elevate and finish against length around the rim, something that stood out when Virginia’s Ugonna Onyenso repeatedly blocked his shot in the ACC championship game. Yes, Boozer’s ability as a rim protector is suspect, to say the least, with a minuscule 0.9 percent block rate in conference games. Finally, at 6 feet 9 and 250 pounds, he’s undersized for a center but may not have the mobility to play power forward.

The reason you take him No. 1 anyway is that Boozer was basically “college basketball Nikola Jokić” last season. He’s a huge, wide big man who nonetheless can handle on the perimeter and shoot 3s (39.1 percent from distance, 78.9 percent from the line). Duke ran inverted pick-and-rolls for him last season, where he was picking out 3-point shooters on the weak side and flicking one-handed crosscourt passes. As a rule, teenage centers do not do this, and when they do, they turn out to be pretty special.

That, basically, is my elevator pitch for Boozer as the top pick: Don’t worry about the defense, because the offense is going to be ridiculous. Pairing him with a mobile shot-blocker will be important, but Boozer’s resume is overwhelming.

I’ll throw in a few other Boozer nuggets while I’m here. First of all, his feel at the defensive end is pretty strong too; he averaged 2.8 steals per 100 possessions in conference play, which a lot of first-round guards didn’t do.

But let’s get back to that passing, because that to me is the ultimate reason to take him. I have a basic draft theory that I call the Marc Gasol Rule: Bigs who can pass, figure it out. Gasol was thought to be so vulnerable on defense that the Grizzlies drafted Hasheem Thabeet to play next to him. Gasol ended up winning a Defensive Player of the Year trophy. So much of big-man defense is reading what’s happening and figuring out position and angles. That’s why a lot of “feel” bigs like Gasol (or Jokić!) end up being solid-to-good defenders even with meh tools.

Boozer is only 6-9, so he’s operating with a different ceiling, and ultimately, he may play a lot at power forward. But he showed enough mobility that I don’t think he’d be a disaster at that spot defensively, and he’d have massive advantages at the other end if matched up that way.

In the end, it’s hard not to see a Kevin Love-type impact as a median outcome for Boozer, but he was so dominant at such a young age that there may be upside for more.


He basically says the offense outweighs the defense. Ok. But how good is offense? Is it most secondary scorer good passer? Or primary scorer good passer? I don't buy the high end upside on Boozer's scoring. I buy his passing, but you still would need to find a primary scorer who's not bad defensively and a rim protector who could ideally space the floor. I'm concerned about his switchability, I'm concerned about his rim protection, I'm concerned about his potential to be a primary scorer. He's a very good player who doesn't easily fit into building a winning team. Boozer's best fit is for teams that already have a two way primary scorer. Like Cade or Ant or Flagg.


I don't think the rim protector next to him has to space the floor at all. Boozer projects as a plus shooter, you could play next to any rim runner big like Gafford, Gobert, whoever... I actually think he fits into most teams pretty flawlessly because he is a good floor spacer at the 4, good rebounder and has good size- that is basically the modern NBA 4 man. Could be awesome 2nd or 3rd option like a Kevin Love or Karl Anthony Towns.

Where I have my doubts is that he will be good enough ball handler to play like a Paolo or Jalen Johnson where he is trying to get downhill from perimeter vs mismatches. He mostly played back to back basket in college and overpowered smaller players- his drives per game were few and far between and that is vs college defenders, not #1 option defenders. He has good size, but he will be nothing special in the NBA where guys longer, taller, more athletic will be guarding him on the regular.

I still think he is a top 3 asset in this draft because with his IQ and Skill he will be a good player, just not sold he is a special player vs NBA talent.

Boozer can space the floor but I'm talking about when he scores. Like he needs to score points. This is why I was raising the question, what does Boozer the scorer look like in the NBA?
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 15,149
And1: 7,392
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#864 » by JMAC3 » Mon May 18, 2026 4:23 pm

prime1time wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
prime1time wrote:I think the concern for Boozer has to be whether or not he can be a #1 scoring option. Like what does Boozer do against a player like Gobert? Or Wemby? Or Jalen Duren? Or Wendell Carter? Do we really see Boozer pushing these guys around? John Hollinger has Boozer at #1 on his board.



He basically says the offense outweighs the defense. Ok. But how good is offense? Is it most secondary scorer good passer? Or primary scorer good passer? I don't buy the high end upside on Boozer's scoring. I buy his passing, but you still would need to find a primary scorer who's not bad defensively and a rim protector who could ideally space the floor. I'm concerned about his switchability, I'm concerned about his rim protection, I'm concerned about his potential to be a primary scorer. He's a very good player who doesn't easily fit into building a winning team. Boozer's best fit is for teams that already have a two way primary scorer. Like Cade or Ant or Flagg.


I don't think the rim protector next to him has to space the floor at all. Boozer projects as a plus shooter, you could play next to any rim runner big like Gafford, Gobert, whoever... I actually think he fits into most teams pretty flawlessly because he is a good floor spacer at the 4, good rebounder and has good size- that is basically the modern NBA 4 man. Could be awesome 2nd or 3rd option like a Kevin Love or Karl Anthony Towns.

Where I have my doubts is that he will be good enough ball handler to play like a Paolo or Jalen Johnson where he is trying to get downhill from perimeter vs mismatches. He mostly played back to back basket in college and overpowered smaller players- his drives per game were few and far between and that is vs college defenders, not #1 option defenders. He has good size, but he will be nothing special in the NBA where guys longer, taller, more athletic will be guarding him on the regular.

I still think he is a top 3 asset in this draft because with his IQ and Skill he will be a good player, just not sold he is a special player vs NBA talent.

Boozer can space the floor but I'm talking about when he scores. Like he needs to score points. This is why I was raising the question, what does Boozer the scorer look like in the NBA?


It is pretty easy to score 15-20 ppg in the NBA especially if you can make a few threes. OG Anunoby averaged 17 ppg this year, Saddiq Bey averaged 18 ppg. Neither one of those guys are amazing 1 on 1 players, if you have size and can make threes it isn't that difficult.
prime1time
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 3,109
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#865 » by prime1time » Mon May 18, 2026 4:41 pm

JMAC3 wrote:
prime1time wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
I don't think the rim protector next to him has to space the floor at all. Boozer projects as a plus shooter, you could play next to any rim runner big like Gafford, Gobert, whoever... I actually think he fits into most teams pretty flawlessly because he is a good floor spacer at the 4, good rebounder and has good size- that is basically the modern NBA 4 man. Could be awesome 2nd or 3rd option like a Kevin Love or Karl Anthony Towns.

Where I have my doubts is that he will be good enough ball handler to play like a Paolo or Jalen Johnson where he is trying to get downhill from perimeter vs mismatches. He mostly played back to back basket in college and overpowered smaller players- his drives per game were few and far between and that is vs college defenders, not #1 option defenders. He has good size, but he will be nothing special in the NBA where guys longer, taller, more athletic will be guarding him on the regular.

I still think he is a top 3 asset in this draft because with his IQ and Skill he will be a good player, just not sold he is a special player vs NBA talent.

Boozer can space the floor but I'm talking about when he scores. Like he needs to score points. This is why I was raising the question, what does Boozer the scorer look like in the NBA?


It is pretty easy to score 15-20 ppg in the NBA especially if you can make a few threes. OG Anunoby averaged 17 ppg this year, Saddiq Bey averaged 18 ppg. Neither one of those guys are amazing 1 on 1 players, if you have size and can make threes it isn't that difficult.

That's true but what's the ceiling for Boozer? I was watching Karl Malone. I love the way Boozer uses his strengths on his drives, but I think he might find it tough to finish inside consistently with all that size. For a player of Boozer's skill 15-20 is automatic in the NBA. My question is can he get to 25? Can he get to 27? Can he get to 30? You're drafting him top 4 in a loaded draft. I need more than 15-20 points a game. And this is particularly important for Boozer because I have concerns about his defense. If he was a great defender who could switch 15-20 would be acceptable. OG is giving you 17 but OG is guarding 1-4 and most times the opposing teams best scoring wing/guard. Boozer will not be so I need major offensive upside. I need points and I need assists. Doesn't have to be Jokic but it needs to be significant.
FarBeyondDriven
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,152
And1: 3,875
Joined: Aug 11, 2021

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#866 » by FarBeyondDriven » Tue May 19, 2026 5:07 am

prime1time wrote:I think the concern for Boozer has to be whether or not he can be a #1 scoring option. Like what does Boozer do against a player like Gobert? Or Wemby? Or Jalen Duren? Or Wendell Carter? Do we really see Boozer pushing these guys around? John Hollinger has Boozer at #1 on his board.

1. Cameron Boozer, freshman, 6-9, PF/C, Duke
Yes, Boozer.

Similar to Cooper Flagg a year earlier, Boozer both destroyed college basketball and, at 18 years old, is the youngest college prospect in the draft. That he isn’t obviously the No. 1 pick at this point is a tell on the strength of this class, but I also wonder if everyone is overthinking things a bit.

Yes, some weaknesses jump out when you watch Boozer. He struggles to elevate and finish against length around the rim, something that stood out when Virginia’s Ugonna Onyenso repeatedly blocked his shot in the ACC championship game. Yes, Boozer’s ability as a rim protector is suspect, to say the least, with a minuscule 0.9 percent block rate in conference games. Finally, at 6 feet 9 and 250 pounds, he’s undersized for a center but may not have the mobility to play power forward.

The reason you take him No. 1 anyway is that Boozer was basically “college basketball Nikola Jokić” last season. He’s a huge, wide big man who nonetheless can handle on the perimeter and shoot 3s (39.1 percent from distance, 78.9 percent from the line). Duke ran inverted pick-and-rolls for him last season, where he was picking out 3-point shooters on the weak side and flicking one-handed crosscourt passes. As a rule, teenage centers do not do this, and when they do, they turn out to be pretty special.

That, basically, is my elevator pitch for Boozer as the top pick: Don’t worry about the defense, because the offense is going to be ridiculous. Pairing him with a mobile shot-blocker will be important, but Boozer’s resume is overwhelming.

I’ll throw in a few other Boozer nuggets while I’m here. First of all, his feel at the defensive end is pretty strong too; he averaged 2.8 steals per 100 possessions in conference play, which a lot of first-round guards didn’t do.

But let’s get back to that passing, because that to me is the ultimate reason to take him. I have a basic draft theory that I call the Marc Gasol Rule: Bigs who can pass, figure it out. Gasol was thought to be so vulnerable on defense that the Grizzlies drafted Hasheem Thabeet to play next to him. Gasol ended up winning a Defensive Player of the Year trophy. So much of big-man defense is reading what’s happening and figuring out position and angles. That’s why a lot of “feel” bigs like Gasol (or Jokić!) end up being solid-to-good defenders even with meh tools.

Boozer is only 6-9, so he’s operating with a different ceiling, and ultimately, he may play a lot at power forward. But he showed enough mobility that I don’t think he’d be a disaster at that spot defensively, and he’d have massive advantages at the other end if matched up that way.

In the end, it’s hard not to see a Kevin Love-type impact as a median outcome for Boozer, but he was so dominant at such a young age that there may be upside for more.


He basically says the offense outweighs the defense. Ok. But how good is offense? Is it most secondary scorer good passer? Or primary scorer good passer? I don't buy the high end upside on Boozer's scoring. I buy his passing, but you still would need to find a primary scorer who's not bad defensively and a rim protector who could ideally space the floor. I'm concerned about his switchability, I'm concerned about his rim protection, I'm concerned about his potential to be a primary scorer. He's a very good player who doesn't easily fit into building a winning team. Boozer's best fit is for teams that already have a two way primary scorer. Like Cade or Ant or Flagg.


what does any player do against Gobert and Wemby? I mean, they're elite defenders. Boozer will at least force Gobert out to defend the perimeter freeing up the paint for drivers. I mean, nobody can matchup with Wemby. Carter and the rest? He's basically their size but way more skilled. He'll probably force them to foul him and live on the FT line tbh. I've seen him punish guards and wings on closeouts so not sure what scrub centers are going to do. Sure, he'll get blocked plenty and he'll get scored upon by those scrubs so it's not all daisy's but I am betting he'll be a well-above net positive player despite that.
Foes..you DO realize I don't see your posts....right?
prime1time
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 3,109
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#867 » by prime1time » Tue May 19, 2026 1:50 pm

FarBeyondDriven wrote:
prime1time wrote:I think the concern for Boozer has to be whether or not he can be a #1 scoring option. Like what does Boozer do against a player like Gobert? Or Wemby? Or Jalen Duren? Or Wendell Carter? Do we really see Boozer pushing these guys around? John Hollinger has Boozer at #1 on his board.

1. Cameron Boozer, freshman, 6-9, PF/C, Duke
Yes, Boozer.

Similar to Cooper Flagg a year earlier, Boozer both destroyed college basketball and, at 18 years old, is the youngest college prospect in the draft. That he isn’t obviously the No. 1 pick at this point is a tell on the strength of this class, but I also wonder if everyone is overthinking things a bit.

Yes, some weaknesses jump out when you watch Boozer. He struggles to elevate and finish against length around the rim, something that stood out when Virginia’s Ugonna Onyenso repeatedly blocked his shot in the ACC championship game. Yes, Boozer’s ability as a rim protector is suspect, to say the least, with a minuscule 0.9 percent block rate in conference games. Finally, at 6 feet 9 and 250 pounds, he’s undersized for a center but may not have the mobility to play power forward.

The reason you take him No. 1 anyway is that Boozer was basically “college basketball Nikola Jokić” last season. He’s a huge, wide big man who nonetheless can handle on the perimeter and shoot 3s (39.1 percent from distance, 78.9 percent from the line). Duke ran inverted pick-and-rolls for him last season, where he was picking out 3-point shooters on the weak side and flicking one-handed crosscourt passes. As a rule, teenage centers do not do this, and when they do, they turn out to be pretty special.

That, basically, is my elevator pitch for Boozer as the top pick: Don’t worry about the defense, because the offense is going to be ridiculous. Pairing him with a mobile shot-blocker will be important, but Boozer’s resume is overwhelming.

I’ll throw in a few other Boozer nuggets while I’m here. First of all, his feel at the defensive end is pretty strong too; he averaged 2.8 steals per 100 possessions in conference play, which a lot of first-round guards didn’t do.

But let’s get back to that passing, because that to me is the ultimate reason to take him. I have a basic draft theory that I call the Marc Gasol Rule: Bigs who can pass, figure it out. Gasol was thought to be so vulnerable on defense that the Grizzlies drafted Hasheem Thabeet to play next to him. Gasol ended up winning a Defensive Player of the Year trophy. So much of big-man defense is reading what’s happening and figuring out position and angles. That’s why a lot of “feel” bigs like Gasol (or Jokić!) end up being solid-to-good defenders even with meh tools.

Boozer is only 6-9, so he’s operating with a different ceiling, and ultimately, he may play a lot at power forward. But he showed enough mobility that I don’t think he’d be a disaster at that spot defensively, and he’d have massive advantages at the other end if matched up that way.

In the end, it’s hard not to see a Kevin Love-type impact as a median outcome for Boozer, but he was so dominant at such a young age that there may be upside for more.


He basically says the offense outweighs the defense. Ok. But how good is offense? Is it most secondary scorer good passer? Or primary scorer good passer? I don't buy the high end upside on Boozer's scoring. I buy his passing, but you still would need to find a primary scorer who's not bad defensively and a rim protector who could ideally space the floor. I'm concerned about his switchability, I'm concerned about his rim protection, I'm concerned about his potential to be a primary scorer. He's a very good player who doesn't easily fit into building a winning team. Boozer's best fit is for teams that already have a two way primary scorer. Like Cade or Ant or Flagg.


what does any player do against Gobert and Wemby? I mean, they're elite defenders. Boozer will at least force Gobert out to defend the perimete freeing up the paint for drivers. I mean, nobody can matchup with Wemby. Carter and the rest? He's basically there size but way more skilled. He'll probably force them to foul him and live on the FT line tbh. I've seen him punish guards and wings on closeouts so not sure what scrub centers are going to do. Sure, he'll get blocked plenty and he'll get scored upon by those scrubs so it's not all daisy's but I am betting he'll be a well-above net positive player despite that.

This is true but the issue is that Boozer's being drafted for his offense. What I'm getting at is I need more than just pound it inside. I need Boozer to round out his offensive game. Middies, floaters, step back 3's etc. This is what's required of him because going inside means he's going to disappear in big games. What I'm basically saying is that you're drafting Boozer to develop into a Luka/Cade/Jokic style player. Slower, but stronger. If we're drafting Boozer to give us 17/10/5 and mediocre defense I don't see the value. Boozer has tremendous offensive upside. If the Wiz drafted him. I'd let Trae Young walk and basically groom Boozer as the player we'd run the offense through. His defense isn't great but it's better than Trae's. And I think the potential is there for him to develop into a 3 level scorer with playmaking ability.
esvl
Veteran
Posts: 2,798
And1: 846
Joined: Jun 02, 2022
     

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#868 » by esvl » Sat May 23, 2026 9:20 am

The most promoted player of the draft, probably ever. A buldozer type of player, probably another Tyrus Thomas or Al Jefferson, in reality.
The-Power
RealGM
Posts: 10,758
And1: 10,215
Joined: Jan 03, 2014
Location: Germany
   

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#869 » by The-Power » Sat May 23, 2026 11:17 am

esvl wrote:The most promoted player of the draft, probably ever. A buldozer type of player, probably another Tyrus Thomas or Al Jefferson, in reality.

What a reductive way of looking at a prospect without even pretending to acknowledge the actual skills that Boozer has.
User avatar
FrodoBaggins
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 4,900
Joined: Dec 25, 2013

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#870 » by FrodoBaggins » Sat May 23, 2026 12:42 pm

Tyrus Thomas? I'd expect that as a diss for Caleb Wilson. Tyler Hansbrough or Luka Garza would've been better names to use.
esvl
Veteran
Posts: 2,798
And1: 846
Joined: Jun 02, 2022
     

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#871 » by esvl » Sat May 23, 2026 1:07 pm

FrodoBaggins wrote:Tyrus Thomas? I'd expect that as a diss for Caleb Wilson. Tyler Hansbrough or Luka Garza would've been better names to use.

I agree. It might have been another Thomas that came up in my mind. I like the Luka Garza comparison.
esvl
Veteran
Posts: 2,798
And1: 846
Joined: Jun 02, 2022
     

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#872 » by esvl » Sat May 23, 2026 1:09 pm

The-Power wrote:
esvl wrote:The most promoted player of the draft, probably ever. A buldozer type of player, probably another Tyrus Thomas or Al Jefferson, in reality.

What a reductive way of looking at a prospect without even pretending to acknowledge the actual skills that Boozer has.

He has tremendous skills, and he is hell of a basketball player, his future in the NBA is nothing but bright, but at this draft he is a Tier 2 guy, who is for whatever reason is being sold quite persistently as undeniably a Tier 1 generational talent.
User avatar
FrodoBaggins
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 4,900
Joined: Dec 25, 2013

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#873 » by FrodoBaggins » Sat May 23, 2026 1:09 pm

prime1time wrote:I think the concern for Boozer has to be whether or not he can be a #1 scoring option. Like what does Boozer do against a player like Gobert? Or Wemby? Or Jalen Duren? Or Wendell Carter? Do we really see Boozer pushing these guys around? John Hollinger has Boozer at #1 on his board.

1. Cameron Boozer, freshman, 6-9, PF/C, Duke
Yes, Boozer.

Similar to Cooper Flagg a year earlier, Boozer both destroyed college basketball and, at 18 years old, is the youngest college prospect in the draft. That he isn’t obviously the No. 1 pick at this point is a tell on the strength of this class, but I also wonder if everyone is overthinking things a bit.

Yes, some weaknesses jump out when you watch Boozer. He struggles to elevate and finish against length around the rim, something that stood out when Virginia’s Ugonna Onyenso repeatedly blocked his shot in the ACC championship game. Yes, Boozer’s ability as a rim protector is suspect, to say the least, with a minuscule 0.9 percent block rate in conference games. Finally, at 6 feet 9 and 250 pounds, he’s undersized for a center but may not have the mobility to play power forward.

The reason you take him No. 1 anyway is that Boozer was basically “college basketball Nikola Jokić” last season. He’s a huge, wide big man who nonetheless can handle on the perimeter and shoot 3s (39.1 percent from distance, 78.9 percent from the line). Duke ran inverted pick-and-rolls for him last season, where he was picking out 3-point shooters on the weak side and flicking one-handed crosscourt passes. As a rule, teenage centers do not do this, and when they do, they turn out to be pretty special.

That, basically, is my elevator pitch for Boozer as the top pick: Don’t worry about the defense, because the offense is going to be ridiculous. Pairing him with a mobile shot-blocker will be important, but Boozer’s resume is overwhelming.

I’ll throw in a few other Boozer nuggets while I’m here. First of all, his feel at the defensive end is pretty strong too; he averaged 2.8 steals per 100 possessions in conference play, which a lot of first-round guards didn’t do.

But let’s get back to that passing, because that to me is the ultimate reason to take him. I have a basic draft theory that I call the Marc Gasol Rule: Bigs who can pass, figure it out. Gasol was thought to be so vulnerable on defense that the Grizzlies drafted Hasheem Thabeet to play next to him. Gasol ended up winning a Defensive Player of the Year trophy. So much of big-man defense is reading what’s happening and figuring out position and angles. That’s why a lot of “feel” bigs like Gasol (or Jokić!) end up being solid-to-good defenders even with meh tools.

Boozer is only 6-9, so he’s operating with a different ceiling, and ultimately, he may play a lot at power forward. But he showed enough mobility that I don’t think he’d be a disaster at that spot defensively, and he’d have massive advantages at the other end if matched up that way.

In the end, it’s hard not to see a Kevin Love-type impact as a median outcome for Boozer, but he was so dominant at such a young age that there may be upside for more.


He basically says the offense outweighs the defense. Ok. But how good is offense? Is it most secondary scorer good passer? Or primary scorer good passer? I don't buy the high end upside on Boozer's scoring. I buy his passing, but you still would need to find a primary scorer who's not bad defensively and a rim protector who could ideally space the floor. I'm concerned about his switchability, I'm concerned about his rim protection, I'm concerned about his potential to be a primary scorer. He's a very good player who doesn't easily fit into building a winning team. Boozer's best fit is for teams that already have a two way primary scorer. Like Cade or Ant or Flagg.

I have a different view from John Hollinger.

I think Cameron is going to be more of a combo forward (PF/SF) than a PF/C. I don't view him as an undersized center; rather, I think he has the positional versatility to switch onto centers, defend them in the post, block/box them out, and compete with them for contested rebounds. I also think he can play the 5 in some small-ball lineups with the right personnel.

I honestly wouldn't be surprised if he becomes a good defender in the NBA. Something closer to Kyle Anderson, Aaron Gordon, or Jayson Tatum.
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 17,106
And1: 1,661
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#874 » by ecuhus1981 » Sat May 23, 2026 2:48 pm

I can appreciate your belief in Cam. He can become great, and I think spending any time at the 3 would be a waste of his greatness.

Try this thought experiment for me: on which playoff roster would he make sense as a SF?

On OKC, with Chet and Isaiah? Chet could switch onto SFs, sure, but that's not your argument. Anybody could play SF if every other teammate could fill the void that their mismatch presents.

On SAS, with Wemby and Champagnie? Again, not with Champagnie at the 3, but with Cam on the perimeter.

On NYK, with OJ or Hart in the post and KAT at the 5?

In Cleveland, with Evan and Jarrett clogging the paint?
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
User avatar
FrodoBaggins
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 4,900
Joined: Dec 25, 2013

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#875 » by FrodoBaggins » Sat May 23, 2026 3:03 pm

The problem with your thought experiment is that you're starting with the assumption that Cam is a liability on defense at the SF position.

I thought he defended the perimeter better than he did the paint. I think he moves well laterally, supported by the NBA Draft Combine results. But we won't get an accurate assessment of his defensive ability until we see him in an environment where he doesn't have to pace himself and avoid foul trouble due to a gargantuan offensive load. Like Edey at Purdue, who's flashed legitimate All-Defensive upside in the NBA.
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 17,106
And1: 1,661
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#876 » by ecuhus1981 » Sat May 23, 2026 3:09 pm

Eh, All-Defensive upside for Zach is overstatement, but I take your point.

Maybe in a smaller role, Cam can devote more if his energy to defense. This is true of most prospects. Sometimes, guys that don't fit the mold can thrive at the 3, like Markkanen and Dort.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
User avatar
FrodoBaggins
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 4,900
Joined: Dec 25, 2013

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#877 » by FrodoBaggins » Sat May 23, 2026 3:19 pm

The upside that Zach showed this season was legitimately DPOY-level, but it was only slightly under 300 minutes on-court and like 11 games. So, small sample. But the defensive presence was real and scary. Wemby-like, and that's not an exaggeration. Check the numbers (OnCourt, On-Off DRtg, shot contesting, one number metrics, DRAPM) and watch this video:

Time stamps for defensive highlights:

0:11 Defending in Space
25:38 Defensive Rebounding/ Outlet Passing
34:55 Rim Protection
42:42 Rim Deterrence

User avatar
MalonesElbows
Starter
Posts: 2,494
And1: 1,535
Joined: Sep 14, 2009
     

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#878 » by MalonesElbows » Sat May 23, 2026 5:17 pm

prime1time wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
prime1time wrote:I think the concern for Boozer has to be whether or not he can be a #1 scoring option. Like what does Boozer do against a player like Gobert? Or Wemby? Or Jalen Duren? Or Wendell Carter? Do we really see Boozer pushing these guys around? John Hollinger has Boozer at #1 on his board.



He basically says the offense outweighs the defense. Ok. But how good is offense? Is it most secondary scorer good passer? Or primary scorer good passer? I don't buy the high end upside on Boozer's scoring. I buy his passing, but you still would need to find a primary scorer who's not bad defensively and a rim protector who could ideally space the floor. I'm concerned about his switchability, I'm concerned about his rim protection, I'm concerned about his potential to be a primary scorer. He's a very good player who doesn't easily fit into building a winning team. Boozer's best fit is for teams that already have a two way primary scorer. Like Cade or Ant or Flagg.


I don't think the rim protector next to him has to space the floor at all. Boozer projects as a plus shooter, you could play next to any rim runner big like Gafford, Gobert, whoever... I actually think he fits into most teams pretty flawlessly because he is a good floor spacer at the 4, good rebounder and has good size- that is basically the modern NBA 4 man. Could be awesome 2nd or 3rd option like a Kevin Love or Karl Anthony Towns.

Where I have my doubts is that he will be good enough ball handler to play like a Paolo or Jalen Johnson where he is trying to get downhill from perimeter vs mismatches. He mostly played back to back basket in college and overpowered smaller players- his drives per game were few and far between and that is vs college defenders, not #1 option defenders. He has good size, but he will be nothing special in the NBA where guys longer, taller, more athletic will be guarding him on the regular.

I still think he is a top 3 asset in this draft because with his IQ and Skill he will be a good player, just not sold he is a special player vs NBA talent.

Boozer can space the floor but I'm talking about when he scores. Like he needs to score points. This is why I was raising the question, what does Boozer the scorer look like in the NBA?


C'mon now, we have pretty good empirical evidence of that. Just replace about 4 of his midrange jumpers with 3 point shots. C senior did not have a 3 point shot.

prime1time
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,243
And1: 3,109
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#879 » by prime1time » Sat May 23, 2026 5:27 pm

MalonesElbows wrote:
prime1time wrote:
JMAC3 wrote:
I don't think the rim protector next to him has to space the floor at all. Boozer projects as a plus shooter, you could play next to any rim runner big like Gafford, Gobert, whoever... I actually think he fits into most teams pretty flawlessly because he is a good floor spacer at the 4, good rebounder and has good size- that is basically the modern NBA 4 man. Could be awesome 2nd or 3rd option like a Kevin Love or Karl Anthony Towns.

Where I have my doubts is that he will be good enough ball handler to play like a Paolo or Jalen Johnson where he is trying to get downhill from perimeter vs mismatches. He mostly played back to back basket in college and overpowered smaller players- his drives per game were few and far between and that is vs college defenders, not #1 option defenders. He has good size, but he will be nothing special in the NBA where guys longer, taller, more athletic will be guarding him on the regular.

I still think he is a top 3 asset in this draft because with his IQ and Skill he will be a good player, just not sold he is a special player vs NBA talent.

Boozer can space the floor but I'm talking about when he scores. Like he needs to score points. This is why I was raising the question, what does Boozer the scorer look like in the NBA?


C'mon now, we have pretty good empirical evidence of that. Just replace about 4 of his midrange jumpers with 3 point shots. C senior did not have a 3 point shot.


Hard to just add 3-point shots lol. And I think he'll find it harder to score close to the rim than in college. Boozer will be a good player but I have concerns about his defense and his scoring. Let's say he adds 4 3-pointers a game. There's another issue. Can he be the #1 guy? I don't think he can. I think he fits best playing off a star like Cade or Ant. It'll be interesting to see how his career tracks.
FarBeyondDriven
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,152
And1: 3,875
Joined: Aug 11, 2021

Re: Cameron Boozer 

Post#880 » by FarBeyondDriven » Sat May 23, 2026 9:47 pm

prime1time wrote:
FarBeyondDriven wrote:
prime1time wrote:I think the concern for Boozer has to be whether or not he can be a #1 scoring option. Like what does Boozer do against a player like Gobert? Or Wemby? Or Jalen Duren? Or Wendell Carter? Do we really see Boozer pushing these guys around? John Hollinger has Boozer at #1 on his board.



He basically says the offense outweighs the defense. Ok. But how good is offense? Is it most secondary scorer good passer? Or primary scorer good passer? I don't buy the high end upside on Boozer's scoring. I buy his passing, but you still would need to find a primary scorer who's not bad defensively and a rim protector who could ideally space the floor. I'm concerned about his switchability, I'm concerned about his rim protection, I'm concerned about his potential to be a primary scorer. He's a very good player who doesn't easily fit into building a winning team. Boozer's best fit is for teams that already have a two way primary scorer. Like Cade or Ant or Flagg.


what does any player do against Gobert and Wemby? I mean, they're elite defenders. Boozer will at least force Gobert out to defend the perimete freeing up the paint for drivers. I mean, nobody can matchup with Wemby. Carter and the rest? He's basically there size but way more skilled. He'll probably force them to foul him and live on the FT line tbh. I've seen him punish guards and wings on closeouts so not sure what scrub centers are going to do. Sure, he'll get blocked plenty and he'll get scored upon by those scrubs so it's not all daisy's but I am betting he'll be a well-above net positive player despite that.

This is true but the issue is that Boozer's being drafted for his offense. What I'm getting at is I need more than just pound it inside. I need Boozer to round out his offensive game. Middies, floaters, step back 3's etc. This is what's required of him because going inside means he's going to disappear in big games. What I'm basically saying is that you're drafting Boozer to develop into a Luka/Cade/Jokic style player. Slower, but stronger. If we're drafting Boozer to give us 17/10/5 and mediocre defense I don't see the value. Boozer has tremendous offensive upside. If the Wiz drafted him. I'd let Trae Young walk and basically groom Boozer as the player we'd run the offense through. His defense isn't great but it's better than Trae's. And I think the potential is there for him to develop into a 3 level scorer with playmaking ability.


Sengun had a 20/9/6 season with putrid defense and only 30% from three. That to me is Boozer's worst case scenario. I think 22-10-5 with 36-40% from three with better defense is possible. Only 1 players in the whole league did that and it's multiple time MVP Jokic. The beautiful thing is it'll come in the flow of the offense with very little turnovers or need to dominate the ball. Guys are going to love playing with him.
Foes..you DO realize I don't see your posts....right?

Return to NBA Draft