Darryn Peterson

Draft talk all year round

Moderators: Marcus, Duke4life831

User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 37,524
And1: 19,808
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#521 » by babyjax13 » Sun May 17, 2026 5:53 pm

RookieJazz wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:Peterson's comp for himself is Bradley Beal, which feels pretty self-aware. I also like Sonics Ray Allen as a comparison (I see a bit of Ben Gordon, too). We just haven't really seen "point guard" at Kansas and I think the off-ball stuff in college was way more interesting than on-ball. I really expected his on-ball stuff to translate better, but I think I overestimated the level of athlete he is - which I often do when watching high school players, lol. I really thought he would outperform AJ but that was wrong (and AJ developed quite a bit over the course of the season, I like him way more now than I did to start the year - and I did like him then, too). I think AJ is the clear #1, and it is a good debate between Boozer and Peterson for #2.


The only thing that keeps DP close to Boozer is medical tests. If DP have medical clearance, he is one tier above Boozer and debatable #1 pick.

He didn't show anything in college that suggests he should go first or be in a tier separate from Boozer. I have him over Boozer, but I do think that is mostly hopium based on the seasons they had.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 32,893
And1: 31,865
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#522 » by mademan » Sun May 17, 2026 7:23 pm

babyjax13 wrote:Peterson's comp for himself is Bradley Beal, which feels pretty self-aware. I also like Sonics Ray Allen as a comparison (I see a bit of Ben Gordon, too). We just haven't really seen "point guard" at Kansas and I think the off-ball stuff in college was way more interesting than on-ball. I really expected his on-ball stuff to translate better, but I think I overestimated the level of athlete he is - which I often do when watching high school players, lol. I really thought he would outperform AJ but that was wrong (and AJ developed quite a bit over the course of the season, I like him way more now than I did to start the year - and I did like him then, too). I think AJ is the clear #1, and it is a good debate between Boozer and Peterson for #2.


I like the Ray Allen comp a lot, with the caveat that i think he's a much better player in this era
User avatar
MalonesElbows
Starter
Posts: 2,496
And1: 1,536
Joined: Sep 14, 2009
     

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#523 » by MalonesElbows » Sun May 17, 2026 8:49 pm

mademan wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:Peterson's comp for himself is Bradley Beal, which feels pretty self-aware. I also like Sonics Ray Allen as a comparison (I see a bit of Ben Gordon, too). We just haven't really seen "point guard" at Kansas and I think the off-ball stuff in college was way more interesting than on-ball. I really expected his on-ball stuff to translate better, but I think I overestimated the level of athlete he is - which I often do when watching high school players, lol. I really thought he would outperform AJ but that was wrong (and AJ developed quite a bit over the course of the season, I like him way more now than I did to start the year - and I did like him then, too). I think AJ is the clear #1, and it is a good debate between Boozer and Peterson for #2.


I like the Ray Allen comp a lot, with the caveat that i think he's a much better player in this era


Allen was one of the best shooters to every play the game. That's a hell of a leap to assume DP's shooting will be in the 99.9% range of all NBA players.
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 37,524
And1: 19,808
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#524 » by babyjax13 » Sun May 17, 2026 9:00 pm

MalonesElbows wrote:
mademan wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:Peterson's comp for himself is Bradley Beal, which feels pretty self-aware. I also like Sonics Ray Allen as a comparison (I see a bit of Ben Gordon, too). We just haven't really seen "point guard" at Kansas and I think the off-ball stuff in college was way more interesting than on-ball. I really expected his on-ball stuff to translate better, but I think I overestimated the level of athlete he is - which I often do when watching high school players, lol. I really thought he would outperform AJ but that was wrong (and AJ developed quite a bit over the course of the season, I like him way more now than I did to start the year - and I did like him then, too). I think AJ is the clear #1, and it is a good debate between Boozer and Peterson for #2.


I like the Ray Allen comp a lot, with the caveat that i think he's a much better player in this era


Allen was one of the best shooters to every play the game. That's a hell of a leap to assume DP's shooting will be in the 99.9% range of all NBA players.

I am not saying he will be that good, just that his game is reminiscent. I do think his shooting is going to be pretty effective, though. I think he has a range of outcomes from a bigger Ben Gordon, to Bradley Beal, to Ray Allen. That is a wide spectrum, and for the most part, you'd be pretty pleased with all but the worst outcomes.
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
User avatar
Cammo101
Mr. Mock Draft
Posts: 31,704
And1: 2,482
Joined: Feb 11, 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, TN
     

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#525 » by Cammo101 » Sun May 17, 2026 9:33 pm

MalonesElbows wrote:
mademan wrote:
babyjax13 wrote:Peterson's comp for himself is Bradley Beal, which feels pretty self-aware. I also like Sonics Ray Allen as a comparison (I see a bit of Ben Gordon, too). We just haven't really seen "point guard" at Kansas and I think the off-ball stuff in college was way more interesting than on-ball. I really expected his on-ball stuff to translate better, but I think I overestimated the level of athlete he is - which I often do when watching high school players, lol. I really thought he would outperform AJ but that was wrong (and AJ developed quite a bit over the course of the season, I like him way more now than I did to start the year - and I did like him then, too). I think AJ is the clear #1, and it is a good debate between Boozer and Peterson for #2.


I like the Ray Allen comp a lot, with the caveat that i think he's a much better player in this era


Allen was one of the best shooters to every play the game. That's a hell of a leap to assume DP's shooting will be in the 99.9% range of all NBA players.


He plays a lot like Ray Allen, he doesn't yet shoot it like Ray Allen.
Catchall
RealGM
Posts: 20,823
And1: 11,433
Joined: Jul 06, 2008
     

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#526 » by Catchall » Tue May 19, 2026 10:16 pm

Though these are not direct comps, I think his talent level and potential impact entering the league are comparable to SGA and James Harden.
Upperclass
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,278
And1: 2,417
Joined: Aug 09, 2005

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#527 » by Upperclass » Wed May 20, 2026 1:48 pm

Peterson literally plays nothing like Ray Allen.. Allen was quick as any point guard, could pass, dunk on you, dribble fairly well, fast and could shoot better than anyone before him. Peterson doesnt have any of that except above average shooting. He's closer to Tre Johnson.
lastemp3ror
Senior
Posts: 547
And1: 234
Joined: Jul 02, 2008
   

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#528 » by lastemp3ror » Wed May 20, 2026 2:08 pm

Upperclass wrote:Peterson literally plays nothing like Ray Allen.. Allen was quick as any point guard, could pass, dunk on you, dribble fairly well, fast and could shoot better than anyone before him. Peterson doesnt have any of that except above average shooting. He's closer to Tre Johnson.


He is not like Tre Johnson. Tre Johnson cannot create a shot for himself off the dribble.
ReggiesKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,232
And1: 5,293
Joined: Jan 25, 2025
   

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#529 » by ReggiesKnicks » Wed May 20, 2026 3:19 pm

Upperclass wrote:Peterson literally plays nothing like Ray Allen.. Allen was quick as any point guard, could pass, dunk on you, dribble fairly well, fast and could shoot better than anyone before him. Peterson doesnt have any of that except above average shooting. He's closer to Tre Johnson.


Tre Johnson can't create a shot and can barely dribble. I don't think that comparison is Apt, even if you are los on DP.

Time to remove the emotion from reality
Upperclass
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,278
And1: 2,417
Joined: Aug 09, 2005

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#530 » by Upperclass » Wed May 20, 2026 4:54 pm

lastemp3ror wrote:
Upperclass wrote:Peterson literally plays nothing like Ray Allen.. Allen was quick as any point guard, could pass, dunk on you, dribble fairly well, fast and could shoot better than anyone before him. Peterson doesnt have any of that except above average shooting. He's closer to Tre Johnson.


He is not like Tre Johnson. Tre Johnson cannot create a shot for himself off the dribble.


The H.S. Peterson isnt the same as the one who played at Kansas.. these 2 will get comped quite a bit next season imo
prime1time
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,251
And1: 3,115
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#531 » by prime1time » Wed May 20, 2026 5:43 pm

lastemp3ror wrote:
Upperclass wrote:Peterson literally plays nothing like Ray Allen.. Allen was quick as any point guard, could pass, dunk on you, dribble fairly well, fast and could shoot better than anyone before him. Peterson doesnt have any of that except above average shooting. He's closer to Tre Johnson.


He is not like Tre Johnson. Tre Johnson cannot create a shot for himself off the dribble.

That's all Tre did in college. Tre's actually a warning for Peterson supporters. They are similar athletes. Stats show that Peterson struggled down the stretch to get good looks. I think there's a lot of wishful thinking when it comes to Peterson's on ball creation. He really struggled to create good looks to end the season. And most of his good numbers were from working off ball and coming off screens. I don't even think teams were really sending help. If Peterson becomes a great scorer it'll be because he technically mastered the position like SGA. He's not an overpowering athlete.
prime1time
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,251
And1: 3,115
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#532 » by prime1time » Wed May 20, 2026 5:53 pm

ReggiesKnicks wrote:
Upperclass wrote:Peterson literally plays nothing like Ray Allen.. Allen was quick as any point guard, could pass, dunk on you, dribble fairly well, fast and could shoot better than anyone before him. Peterson doesnt have any of that except above average shooting. He's closer to Tre Johnson.


Tre Johnson can't create a shot and can barely dribble. I don't think that comparison is Apt, even if you are los on DP.

Time to remove the emotion from reality

The comparison is very apt. It's who he played like in college. 1.6 assists. Also there's a ton of Tre Johnson myths on this thread. Tre Johnson was all off the dribble in Texas. He didn't have a pg to pass him the ball. Actually go and watch some tape. Johnson shot 39.7% from 3 on on 11.4 Off-Dribble 3PA/100. There's so many myths being pushed lol. Put Tre Johnson on this Kansas team and he outplays Peterson.



You can say what you want about DP in high school. I'd personally argue that he dominated the ball and generated assists that were schemed. I've never seen a player just stop being able to generate assists. DP averaged a stunningly low 1.6 assists. DP supporters would have us believe that this is because of full body cramps. But the apparently the cramping didn't impact the scoring or the defense lol. The man is a scorer first, second and third. Maybe he has some more explosion but I still expect a very similar situation to Tre Johnson. He's to be an average to above average athlete in the NBA and he's going to have to work on the technical skills of scoring to become a great scorer. DP generated a stunning amount of points off screens. Something that Tre didn't have the ability to do because Texas sucked. The Tre Johnson disrespect in this thread is crazy.
prime1time
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,251
And1: 3,115
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#533 » by prime1time » Wed May 20, 2026 5:56 pm

After BYU DP shot 35.8% from the field and 1.4 assists a game. Teams were not swarming him. They let him attack. DP just couldn't generate easy looks so every shot he took was contested. How is it that I can see him sliding his feet, playing passing lanes, coming off screens and knocking down shots but when he gets the ball in his hands and attacks he can't do it? What injury impacts only on ball creation and passing?
prime1time
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,251
And1: 3,115
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#534 » by prime1time » Wed May 20, 2026 6:16 pm

In terms of shooting Tre Johnson is light years better than DP. In terms of handles they are about the same. That is unless DP's injury hurt his ball handling. DP's ball handling is reflected in his terrible assists numbers.

Read on Twitter
?s=20

https://sports.yahoo.com/nba/article/does-darryn-peterson-still-belong-in-the-top-3-conversation-in-the-nba-draft-questions-persist-after-tourney-exit-153540021.html
The box score shows 21 points. But it came on 5-for-15 shooting from the field. Dillon Mitchell — assigned to shadow him by St. John’s head coach Rick Pitino — gave him genuine length problems. Peterson struggled to create separation off the dribble, settled for tough pull-ups, and never found a consistent way to pressure the basket. He once again didn’t look explosive in the paint, a concerning trend for a 6-foot-6 guard.

The advanced creation moves that would let him turn the corner against length simply aren’t there at this stage of his development, especially when juxtaposed against BYU forward AJ Dybantsa creating at will, Duke big man Cameron Boozer generating shots both inside and outside, and Arkansas point guard Darius Acuff scoring from every spot on the floor.

Peterson ends his year with an effective field goal percentage of 51.3% against Quad 1 and 2 teams. That’s 13.2% worse than his 64.5% number against Quad 3 and 4 teams, which is the largest drop off of any possible top-10 pick, per CBB Analytics. The better Peterson’s competition, the more his efficiency erodes.

“I was hurt for the majority of the year,” Peterson said. “I went through some really bad stuff. I wasn’t really myself for real until like the end of the year.”

The numbers don’t quite back that up. After Peterson pulled himself out of a game against Oklahoma State on Feb. 18 following a 23-point, 18-minute burst, the criticism was deafening. Jayhawks fans questioned his toughness. Draft boards flickered. And then suddenly, he was available. In the nine games since, he averaged the most minutes (32.7) of his entire season.

But his production was at its worst. He took only 15% of his shots in the half-court at the rim and made just 37% of them. From outside, shots weren’t falling either. He made just 34% of catch-and-shoot jumpers and only 31% of dribble jumpers. If he was as healthy as he says, that’s almost worse.

The scoring numbers are only half of it. The assist column features a big fat goose egg. Peterson had zero assists and three turnovers. Pitino had actually previewed this in his pregame press conference, joking about whether Peterson had any flaws: “You know he's going to shoot the basketball, because he has a negative assist-turnover ratio.”

Sunday validated the scouting report. St. John’s dared him to kick it out to Tre White and Melvin Council Jr. He made one beautiful read to White on a corner 3 that was bricked, but for the most part he didn’t really look to pass. He averaged 1.6 assists all season long, and Kansas’ offensive rating was actually better without him on the floor: 113.2 compared to 109.8 with him
Upperclass
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,278
And1: 2,417
Joined: Aug 09, 2005

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#535 » by Upperclass » Wed May 20, 2026 11:57 pm

Imo a pretty huge caveat on the Peterson analysis is the MINUTE the season was over his team concocted a ridiculous excuse on why he underperformed despite solid scoring and shooting numbers..Which in and of itself should be telling. I think the jump in competition level didnt allow some of his skills to translate and he also seemed poorly conditioned.
User avatar
JMAC3
RealGM
Posts: 15,162
And1: 7,412
Joined: May 22, 2010
     

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#536 » by JMAC3 » Thu May 21, 2026 4:41 pm

Upperclass wrote:Imo a pretty huge caveat on the Peterson analysis is the MINUTE the season was over his team concocted a ridiculous excuse on why he underperformed despite solid scoring and shooting numbers..Which in and of itself should be telling. I think the jump in competition level didnt allow some of his skills to translate and he also seemed poorly conditioned.


This is a pretty common theme especially for guards, who are now at a much larger height discrepancy vs the average player of the floor. Austin Rivers was once considered the best high school player since LeBron.... not everything always translates.
prime1time
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,251
And1: 3,115
Joined: Nov 02, 2016
         

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#537 » by prime1time » Thu May 21, 2026 5:21 pm

JMAC3 wrote:
Upperclass wrote:Imo a pretty huge caveat on the Peterson analysis is the MINUTE the season was over his team concocted a ridiculous excuse on why he underperformed despite solid scoring and shooting numbers..Which in and of itself should be telling. I think the jump in competition level didnt allow some of his skills to translate and he also seemed poorly conditioned.


This is a pretty common theme especially for guards, who are now at a much larger height discrepancy vs the average player of the floor. Austin Rivers was once considered the best high school player since LeBron.... not everything always translates.

I have to agree just look at SGA in the Spurs series. He has to make some really tough shots. Not saying that Peterson couldn't be injured but only the most explosive 2 guards make it look easy. Kobe, MJ, Vince, Wade. Everyone else is making tough shots or is super skilled.Peterson can still be a great guard but he's going to need to adjust and improve his game. The "he moves like Kobe" always seemed silly to me. Kobe practice thousands of hours in the gym. That wasn't something that was innate.
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 28,759
And1: 12,146
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#538 » by wco81 » Tue Jun 16, 2026 9:12 am

Peterson said he will only do predraft workouts for the Wizards.

On the KOC podcast they said he’s introverted, different from other franchise players or top draftees who are usually expected to become face of the franchise.
bucknut
Senior
Posts: 544
And1: 277
Joined: Feb 27, 2012

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#539 » by bucknut » Mon Jun 22, 2026 9:12 pm

babyjax13 wrote:Peterson's comp for himself is Bradley Beal, which feels pretty self-aware. I also like Sonics Ray Allen as a comparison (I see a bit of Ben Gordon, too). We just haven't really seen "point guard" at Kansas and I think the off-ball stuff in college was way more interesting than on-ball. I really expected his on-ball stuff to translate better, but I think I overestimated the level of athlete he is - which I often do when watching high school players, lol. I really thought he would outperform AJ but that was wrong (and AJ developed quite a bit over the course of the season, I like him way more now than I did to start the year - and I did like him then, too). I think AJ is the clear #1, and it is a good debate between Boozer and Peterson for #2.


i don't think peterson has beals bag; or fluidity for self creation. i can see some allen, kerry kittles or larry hughes.

peterson isn't a creator for others - I don't think he can go #1 and have outcomes that he is a 3rd option
sikma42
General Manager
Posts: 7,776
And1: 7,065
Joined: Nov 23, 2011

Re: Darryn Peterson 

Post#540 » by sikma42 » Tue Jun 23, 2026 1:12 am

Upperclass wrote:Imo a pretty huge caveat on the Peterson analysis is the MINUTE the season was over his team concocted a ridiculous excuse on why he underperformed despite solid scoring and shooting numbers..Which in and of itself should be telling. I think the jump in competition level didnt allow some of his skills to translate and he also seemed poorly conditioned.


He looked like a kid playing through an injury. Was saying that earlier this season, he just looked like he a 34 year old with a degenerative injury. If this was just some freak thing, then his pure talent level is up there with the best shooting guards (wade, Kobe, SGA). If he’s always going to be dealing with whatever this is… then it’s a different story

Return to NBA Draft