SeattleJazzFan wrote:Cammo101 wrote:JMAC3 wrote:I would rate Flagg higher than AJ, mainly because of age and defense... however AJ is underrated at this point. People talk about his passing like he is Michale Porter Jr or Ace Bailey. Dybantsa averaged 3.8 assists/36 playing with a bunch of Mormons while Flagg averaged 4.9 assists/36 playing next to the best shooter in the NBA last year, a 7-2 Center who was the 10th pick and 4 other guys that will be drafted.
AJ is also just bigger and more explosive 42 inch Vert vs 35.5 for Flagg.
AJ also had higher FTr by 6%- with far worse spacing
AJ better 2pt% by 5%- with far worse spacing
AJ would immediately be the Alpha on Wizards, allowing Trae Young to play a more natural 2nd or 3rd option facilitator role and having Davis and Sarr as shot blocking behind two iffy defenders. Tre Johnson, Kyshawn and Riley are all good swing swing attack guys as players, not guys that should dominate ball.
AJ is easily the most clean franchise guy in this draft, honestly probably followed by Acuff.
Peterson is best off ball, going to need to develop a ton on the ball before he will be effective.
Same with Boozer who doesn't really have a natural role, because he isn't really back to basket big or a primary ball handler.
The majority of this is spot on. I have no interest in Flagg vs. AJ, when both are elite level prospects. When I watch AJ, I see a less athletic, more skilled Tracy McGrady. With a little Paul George sprinkled in for good measure.
less athletic? i can pretty much guarantee AJ, at the same stage, is bigger/stronger than McGrady and a 42" vert for a guy AJ's/McGrady's size is about as elite as anybody who has been officially measured. i'd struggle to see what makes AJ less athletic than TMac. AJ is pretty much at the very top of the charts in terms of athleticism.
AJ is stronger and more stout, but he is not the run and jump athlete TMac was. He's a very good athlete, but TMac was a freak of nature in his prime.








