POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
Moderators: loserX, HartfordWhalers, Trader_Joe, Texas Chuck, Andre Roberstan, pacers33granger, Mamba4Goat, MoneyTalks41890
POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum

- Posts: 95,692
- And1: 103,458
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
Blazers trade: Sharpe
Blazers get: Washington
Kings trade: LaVine
Kings get: Sharpe/Martin/Thompson
Mavs trade: Washington/Martin/Thompson
Mavs get: LaVine
Feels to me like Portland owes a bit of value to the Kings, but I might be lower on Sharpe than I should be?
Blazers part much discussed, balances their lineup, gives them a nice 3 man forward rotation, clears some guard glut.Washington can also play some small ball 5 which helps when Williams misses games.
Kings move a guy they aren't committed to even playing for a young SG to move forward with. Maybe due value?
Mavs deal from their forward glut to get backcourt help, with no long-term commitment but Bird Rights if he fits. If nothing else financial flexibility moving forward. Dumping Martin makes up some for the value loss in trading Washington for LaVine.
Blazers get: Washington
Kings trade: LaVine
Kings get: Sharpe/Martin/Thompson
Mavs trade: Washington/Martin/Thompson
Mavs get: LaVine
Feels to me like Portland owes a bit of value to the Kings, but I might be lower on Sharpe than I should be?
Blazers part much discussed, balances their lineup, gives them a nice 3 man forward rotation, clears some guard glut.Washington can also play some small ball 5 which helps when Williams misses games.
Kings move a guy they aren't committed to even playing for a young SG to move forward with. Maybe due value?
Mavs deal from their forward glut to get backcourt help, with no long-term commitment but Bird Rights if he fits. If nothing else financial flexibility moving forward. Dumping Martin makes up some for the value loss in trading Washington for LaVine.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
- JES12
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,873
- And1: 132
- Joined: Jul 05, 2006
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
I think the whole point of Levine in the trade rumors was the 1st round pick that is to accompany him. Honestly, Ai think, if we trade for him, he will take the Kris Middleton role and not be in Mavs future. The pick would be in Mavs future.
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
- longfellow44
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,277
- And1: 424
- Joined: May 04, 2007
- Location: Washinton DC
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
I would prefer washington over sharpe for the kings. Sharpe might be younger but the reason we don't want lavine is the same reason we don't want sharpe, we can't play him with Acuff and expect the other team not to just kill us at the guard spot.
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
- JasonStern
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,560
- And1: 4,453
- Joined: Dec 13, 2008
-
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
Completely indifferent on a Sharpe/Washington swap.
Feels like LaVine is being slightly overvalued here.
Feels like LaVine is being slightly overvalued here.

Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
-
mademan
- RealGM
- Posts: 33,319
- And1: 32,135
- Joined: Feb 18, 2010
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
I think Blazers owe some value here, but not a 1st. Maybe Yang? Who's youth/potential still carries a bit of value? Though agree with the Kings fan, i think they cut out the Blazers here.
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
-
sackings916
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,431
- And1: 958
- Joined: Sep 07, 2002
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
Like the deal for Sac with Washington coming back instead of Sharpe. A wing rotation of Keegan Murray/Washington/Hunter gives 3 switchable plus size wings that can shoot.
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
-
sackings916
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,431
- And1: 958
- Joined: Sep 07, 2002
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
JasonStern wrote:Completely indifferent on a Sharpe/Washington swap.
Feels like LaVine is being slightly overvalued here.
Possibly. But I think LaVine has a chance to have a strong year. He’s healthy, in a contract year, and Sac for some reason stacked last years roster with guards and ball dominant guys. Now with DeRozan, Westbrook, Schroder, Ellis, Devin Carter all gone the playmaking duties will fall mostly on LaVine, Monk and Acuff.
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
- zimpy27
- Forum Mod

- Posts: 48,405
- And1: 46,954
- Joined: Jul 13, 2014
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
Seems like Blazers get cut out
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it rebuild it's perennial play in team
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it rebuild it's perennial play in team
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
-
jayjaysee
- King of the Trade Board
- Posts: 24,144
- And1: 9,913
- Joined: Aug 05, 2012
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
If Portland isn’t adding value, I assume they get cut out.
I don’t love it for Dallas, but at some point there should be a roster balancing move.
I don’t love it for Dallas, but at some point there should be a roster balancing move.
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
-
OGSactownballer
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,997
- And1: 1,471
- Joined: Oct 02, 2005
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
At this point with Lavine opting in I’m happy to send him home to rot until he begs for a reasonable buyout.
I see zero point to giving up the $49 million in expiring money he repreeents for next season. And I laugh at people thinking that there is any world where Scott Perry is fool enough to ADD VALUE to move him for no reason.
Unless a package of young prospects/picks is coming back for an expiring of that size who actually can still help the right team? Not interested in the slightest.
I see zero point to giving up the $49 million in expiring money he repreeents for next season. And I laugh at people thinking that there is any world where Scott Perry is fool enough to ADD VALUE to move him for no reason.
Unless a package of young prospects/picks is coming back for an expiring of that size who actually can still help the right team? Not interested in the slightest.
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
- Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum

- Posts: 95,692
- And1: 103,458
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
Weird response to a deal the OP suggested the Kings were owed value.OGSactownballer wrote:At this point with Lavine opting in I’m happy to send him home to rot until he begs for a reasonable buyout.
I see zero point to giving up the $49 million in expiring money he repreeents for next season. And I laugh at people thinking that there is any world where Scott Perry is fool enough to ADD VALUE to move him for no reason.
Unless a package of young prospects/picks is coming back for an expiring of that size who actually can still help the right team? Not interested in the slightest.
Sent from my SM-A376U1 using RealGM mobile app
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
-
LightTheBeam
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,573
- And1: 12,534
- Joined: Sep 17, 2010
-
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
I dont want Sharpe. Id do it without Portland, with them Included its an easy no.
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
-
daoneandonly
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,872
- And1: 4,471
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
Yea if PDX were cut out, could Sacramento do a 1 for 3 trade? WOuld they be interested in PJ/Klay/Caleb? I think PJ is the best player of all the guys being dealt, so that alone could be an incentive.
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
-
tester551
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,973
- And1: 1,520
- Joined: Jan 10, 2005
- Location: Missing the Coast & Trees
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
I think the Sac/Dallas trade works best
Lavine
for
PJ, Klay, & Martin
This allows the Kings to fill out their roster while staying below the tax.
It helps Dallas balance the roster better
Lavine
for
PJ, Klay, & Martin
This allows the Kings to fill out their roster while staying below the tax.
It helps Dallas balance the roster better
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
-
daoneandonly
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,872
- And1: 4,471
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
tester551 wrote:I think the Sac/Dallas trade works best
Lavine
for
PJ, Klay, & Martin
This allows the Kings to fill out their roster while staying below the tax.
It helps Dallas balance the roster better
Yea id hate to lose PJ. But the FO has essentially dug this team into an imbalanced hole, so this type of trade makes sense. Plus it opens up roster spots for them to potentially sign the 2nd round pick they like and maybe another vet min PG
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
- codydaze
- Forum Mod - Kings

- Posts: 6,684
- And1: 5,165
- Joined: Jul 06, 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA
-
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
daoneandonly wrote:Yea if PDX were cut out, could Sacramento do a 1 for 3 trade? WOuld they be interested in PJ/Klay/Caleb? I think PJ is the best player of all the guys being dealt, so that alone could be an incentive.
We're at 13 roster spots right now so we could do a 1 for 3 deal and not need to cut anyone. I imagine Klay would be bought out regardless though and we would just keep the open roster spot or bring in another point guard.
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
-
daoneandonly
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,872
- And1: 4,471
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
codydaze wrote:daoneandonly wrote:Yea if PDX were cut out, could Sacramento do a 1 for 3 trade? WOuld they be interested in PJ/Klay/Caleb? I think PJ is the best player of all the guys being dealt, so that alone could be an incentive.
We're at 13 roster spots right now so we could do a 1 for 3 deal and not need to cut anyone. I imagine Klay would be bought out regardless though and we would just keep the open roster spot or bring in another point guard.
Is that a deal you'd be in favor of as a Kings fan?
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
- codydaze
- Forum Mod - Kings

- Posts: 6,684
- And1: 5,165
- Joined: Jul 06, 2013
- Location: Sacramento, CA
-
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
daoneandonly wrote:codydaze wrote:daoneandonly wrote:Yea if PDX were cut out, could Sacramento do a 1 for 3 trade? WOuld they be interested in PJ/Klay/Caleb? I think PJ is the best player of all the guys being dealt, so that alone could be an incentive.
We're at 13 roster spots right now so we could do a 1 for 3 deal and not need to cut anyone. I imagine Klay would be bought out regardless though and we would just keep the open roster spot or bring in another point guard.
Is that a deal you'd be in favor of as a Kings fan?
If it came with a couple seconds I think I would do this, yes. I like PJ's fit between Keegan and Sabonis in the starting unit quite a bit, I think moving Keegan back to the 3 will be a huge benefit to him too. Ideally we'd dump Martin somewhere at the deadline or next summer to preserve some of the space that opens up, we'd still have some space to maneuver and gather some assets. Either get a point guard to round out the roster or target someone like Agbaji as a placeholder 2 guard in the starting lineup.
Acuff/Sharp
Agbaji/Monk/Clifford/Plowden
Keegan/Hunter/Martin
PJ/Precious/Karaban
Sabonis/Max/Cardwell
If we're holding on to Sabonis for this season at least, this would be a decent group to put around him. I don't expect we'd be any good still but it's a team I could root for.
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
- babyjax13
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,982
- And1: 20,255
- Joined: Jul 02, 2006
- Location: Fresno, eating Birria
-
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
Is what Dallas sends a neutral value package? I think that is where the problem is. Probably can be balanced with Sacramento getting a bunch of seconds between POR/DAL.

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.
JColl
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
-
daoneandonly
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,872
- And1: 4,471
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
-
Re: POR/SAC/DAL Probably needs help
babyjax13 wrote:Is what Dallas sends a neutral value package? I think that is where the problem is. Probably can be balanced with Sacramento getting a bunch of seconds between POR/DAL.
I think the only negative is Martin. Klay is expiring so I don't think that can be considered negative. PJ is more positive than Caleb is negative imo
Deuteronomy 30:19 wrote:I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live
Return to Trades and Transactions






