ImageImageImageImageImage

The Amazingly Suck Winger/Dawkins thread

Moderators: LyricalRico, nate33, montestewart

User avatar
doclinkin
RealGM
Posts: 16,698
And1: 7,913
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: .wizuds.

Re: The Amazingly Suck Winger/Dawkins thread 

Post#421 » by doclinkin » Mon Sep 7, 2026 10:53 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
doclinkin wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:You missed my posts on this. Trading Deni made sense the following year - only for a much bigger haul. I think nate had it best on why this was the right move (it does annoy me a bit that we can wrap or collective heads around that one).

And nobody has ever answered the argument of how we would no question get a better deal for Deni than we got.

Come on Doc, it has been answered - just not an answer you like.


Must’ve missed it. Probably based on a lot of if-only’s. And 20/20 hindsight. Like the rest of this thread.

I’m so ready for new arguments.

Let’s see: Why does this front office keep recruiting too many Tre’s? We are cornering the market on them. Don’t they know that’s gonna be maddening to keep track of in the broadcast?

Hmm. How come Winger has no imagination beyond borrowing from Oklahoma? Trae Young grew up there. Tre Mann was recruited. Alex Sarr’s brother played for them. He even tried to bring in Westbrook. Dillon Jones for a moment. I’m waiting to hear news that he’s gotten the rights to Nikola Jokic’s severed testicle.

What else.

What is their fetish for top picks? We even added John Wall to the front office. Ewing. Couldn’t quit on Bagwell. Ayton.

Why are we allergic to rebounding? Low post skill. They like multi tool players but the only tool missing from the kit is competent board work. We can dribble and pass and hoist outside shots from any position, but the only plus rebounder we’ve picked up is AD. And he’s tired of doing that work. Wants to play like another giant guard. We’ve got 13 oversized guards on the roster. Can we get bigs who want to play big?
closg00
RealGM
Posts: 26,340
And1: 5,290
Joined: Nov 21, 2004

Re: The Amazingly Suck Winger/Dawkins thread 

Post#422 » by closg00 » Yesterday 4:20 pm

When the Kings outsmart the Wizards FO, it’s gotta go in this thread.
Read on Twitter
DCZards
RealGM
Posts: 11,760
And1: 5,502
Joined: Jul 16, 2005
Location: The Streets of DC
     

Re: The Amazingly Suck Winger/Dawkins thread 

Post#423 » by DCZards » Yesterday 4:51 pm

^^^When Trae is ballin’ out and the Zards are winning…and Cap One is rocking…very few fans are going to care about—or even know—how much money Young is making.
ledell_gumbo
Sophomore
Posts: 163
And1: 110
Joined: Jul 09, 2025

Re: The Amazingly Suck Winger/Dawkins thread 

Post#424 » by ledell_gumbo » Yesterday 5:28 pm

I don't love the Young contract, but this news item isn't some zinger. The Kings are in a very different situation -- ie, at the very beginning of a rebuild, and already with a high payroll. The Wizards' rationale doesn't apply to the Kings.
ledell_gumbo
Sophomore
Posts: 163
And1: 110
Joined: Jul 09, 2025

Re: The Amazingly Suck Winger/Dawkins thread 

Post#425 » by ledell_gumbo » Yesterday 5:32 pm

doclinkin wrote:Why are we allergic to rebounding? Low post skill. They like multi tool players but the only tool missing from the kit is competent board work. We can dribble and pass and hoist outside shots from any position, but the only plus rebounder we’ve picked up is AD. And he’s tired of doing that work. Wants to play like another giant guard. We’ve got 13 oversized guards on the roster. Can we get bigs who want to play big?


I think there's some truth to this one. Their emphasis on versatility has come at the expense of physicality. The young players will surely bulk up some, but I doubt any (aside from maybe AJ) will become a plus in that regard. They could really use an Isaiah Stewart type, something Dawkins has not yet shown any interest in (unless we count Okpara?).

Return to Washington Wizards