ImageImage

Blazers ownership/relocation drama

Moderators: DeBlazerRiddem, Moonbeam

tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,989
And1: 1,530
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#561 » by tester551 » Mon Sep 21, 2026 4:14 am

Shem wrote:Why do people think that besides the fact that he owns an NHL team from there?

Fearmongering

Norm2953 wrote:Dundon is a large part of Raleigh, NC's play for a MLB expansion team. If he were allowed to move the Blazers
to Raleigh, he'd do it in heartbeat for he'd be a part of 3 teams (MLB, NBA, NHL) assuming MLB wants any part of Dundon.

I see that as unlikely. If I in that position-> owning 3 franchises in the same city is the last thing that I would want. It's stupid to put 'all your eggs in one basket' and being completely reliant on a single market.
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 39,098
And1: 24,779
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
 

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#562 » by DusterBuster » Wed Sep 23, 2026 3:16 pm

Just realized media day is next week and we still haven't heard who the new Radio PxP guy is.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 37,179
And1: 8,739
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#563 » by Wizenheimer » Wed Sep 23, 2026 4:18 pm

DusterBuster wrote:Just realized media day is next week and we still haven't heard who the new Radio PxP guy is.


and, if they have announced the new TV play-by-play person, I missed it. Callabro is gone. Hurd is back apparently, although I wouldn't miss either one. Brooke Olzendam is coming back, reportedly.
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,776
And1: 2,353
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#564 » by Norm2953 » Wed Sep 23, 2026 4:39 pm

Maybe they will broadcast the games on TV without announcers
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,989
And1: 1,530
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#565 » by tester551 » Wed Sep 23, 2026 4:46 pm

Norm2953 wrote:Maybe they will broadcast the games on TV without announcers

Are you insinuating that would be a BAD thing?
Honestly, I'd prefer it...
zzaj
RealGM
Posts: 10,101
And1: 4,379
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#566 » by zzaj » Wed Sep 23, 2026 7:00 pm

As we speak, Scrooge McDundon is probably having Cronin canvas UofO and PSU Communications and Media Studies majors looking for interns to announce the games for free.
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 29,564
And1: 12,397
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#567 » by wco81 » Wed Sep 23, 2026 7:38 pm

Timberwolves owners making noise about public money for a new arena for Wolves and Lynx.

If the Portland Fire built a competitive team, they might draw well and make the cost-benefit calculations on renovating the arena better.
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,776
And1: 2,353
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#568 » by Norm2953 » Yesterday 1:40 am

tester551 wrote:
Norm2953 wrote:Maybe they will broadcast the games on TV without announcers

Are you insinuating that would be a BAD thing?
Honestly, I'd prefer it...


Didn't they try this for NFL games?
zzaj
RealGM
Posts: 10,101
And1: 4,379
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#569 » by zzaj » Yesterday 3:27 pm

wco81 wrote:Timberwolves owners making noise about public money for a new arena for Wolves and Lynx.

If the Portland Fire built a competitive team, they might draw well and make the cost-benefit calculations on renovating the arena better.


The Fire were 4th in the WNBA in attendance at about 14.4k, despite only going 17-27. That's only about 3k less than the Blazers average attendance.
dunlop212
Senior
Posts: 571
And1: 124
Joined: Jun 22, 2008

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#570 » by dunlop212 » Yesterday 4:19 pm

Maybe he is waiting for a tesla robot to come up for sale. It could be two way. "Hey Grok, how many 3s has Ja missed tonight?"
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 29,564
And1: 12,397
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#571 » by wco81 » Yesterday 6:01 pm

zzaj wrote:
wco81 wrote:Timberwolves owners making noise about public money for a new arena for Wolves and Lynx.

If the Portland Fire built a competitive team, they might draw well and make the cost-benefit calculations on renovating the arena better.


The Fire were 4th in the WNBA in attendance at about 14.4k, despite only going 17-27. That's only about 3k less than the Blazers average attendance.



Wow that's great.
zzaj
RealGM
Posts: 10,101
And1: 4,379
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#572 » by zzaj » Yesterday 11:59 pm

wco81 wrote:
zzaj wrote:
wco81 wrote:Timberwolves owners making noise about public money for a new arena for Wolves and Lynx.

If the Portland Fire built a competitive team, they might draw well and make the cost-benefit calculations on renovating the arena better.


The Fire were 4th in the WNBA in attendance at about 14.4k, despite only going 17-27. That's only about 3k less than the Blazers average attendance.



Wow that's great.


I'm sure some of it is honeymoon for a new team in town. But considering the 90s Fire team averaged only about 8.3K per game? We'll take it...

I can say that having a WNBA team has piqued my 8.5 year old daughter's interest in basketball, when she had absolutely zero interest before.
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 29,564
And1: 12,397
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#573 » by wco81 » Today 1:05 am

So I looked up the situation with the Packers and Lambeau Field.

Found this article.

For over 67 years, Lambeau Field has been the home of the NFL franchise Green Bay Packers. The stadium was originally built at a cost of $960,000, which would equate to almost $11 billion today. Between 1957 and 1977, the city of Green Bay contributed approximately $334,000 toward the construction costs and initial renovations. On the other hand, the city currently receives more than $1 million (€922,100 / £766,600) in annual rent, which is several times the amount it originally invested. The Packers are also reported to have invested approximately $600 million of their own funds into modernization projects since 2003.

For the Packers, this gives them ample reason to propose a new lease agreement, as the current contract runs until 2032. Essentially, the NFL franchise is requesting the abolition of the annual rent increase and a reduction in the overall lease payment. In return, the Packers are offering to cover all maintenance costs. This comes in the context of the fact that the maintenance fund established in 2003 will be depleted by 2031.


Furthermore, the four-time Super Bowl champion has announced plans to invest approximately $1.5 billion (EUR 1.38 billion / GBP 1.15 billion) in the renovation and modernization of Lambeau Field over the next 20 to 30 years. The project is to be funded entirely without public money. “The Packers have put forward a plan that is the best approach any city could hope for—a plan that does not require public taxpayer money to meet the future needs of Lambeau Field,” said Aaron Popkey, Director of Public Affairs for the Packers. “In contrast, other professional sports cities have had to rely on significant taxpayer subsidies for their stadiums,” Popkey continued. For this reason, the Packers are pushing for a long-term agreement to secure their longtime home, having already been negotiating with the city of Green Bay for a new lease since 2020.


https://www.stadiaworld.com/news/87664/disputes-about-stadium-rent-in-green-bay


Team has spent hundreds of millions over the years to improve different parts of the stadium, without a penny of public money. It's not charity though, a lot of these projects are to make the game day experience better for fans as well as build an entertainment district next to the stadium which ultimately brings the team more money.

But they want a new lease, don't even like paying $1 million rent a year. Their annual profits are in the range of $65-85 million.

Of course, they can't threaten to move the team or at least not so easily. Team is owned by the fans in the community. Presumably they'd get a say if the team was considering moving the franchise.
User avatar
Shem
RealGM
Posts: 15,735
And1: 3,616
Joined: Dec 15, 2009
     

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#574 » by Shem » Today 1:23 am

Image
April 4, 2014:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:I never said Dallas was good as Portland


Earlier on December 8, 2013:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:That's the Whole Point Portland is No better than Dallas
Dame Lizard
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,876
And1: 2,381
Joined: Dec 03, 2012
 

Re: Blazers ownership/relocation drama 

Post#575 » by Dame Lizard » Today 1:26 am

I absolutely hate our owner. He's a clown.

Return to Portland Trail Blazers