ImageImageImageImageImage

Would you want Barry Bonds on the Yankees?

Moderator: nykgeneralmanager

Would you want Barry Bonds on the Yankees?

 
Total votes: 0

HDMAVS760CA
Senior
Posts: 668
And1: 31
Joined: May 13, 2006
Location: ONTARIO, CA
       

Would you want Barry Bonds on the Yankees? 

Post#1 » by HDMAVS760CA » Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:12 am

There's been talk of Bonds going to the D. Rays. Why, proabably cause nobody else wants him & his attitude & baggage. Plus he's probably washed up. But for many years the Yankees seem 2 want every single person to ever play the game of baseball on their team. I'm surprised they yet haven't tried 2 sign him. Bonds, i'd have no problem with going there. Since 2001, he talked about wanting a WS ring. But I think that this is another lie he's telling cause if he did really want a ring, he woulda stopped staying in Frisco cause THEY WILL NEVER WIN A WS! It woulda made sense whenever he was a free agent throughout this decade, cause other players go to the Yankees trying 2 win a WS.
If he was ever gonna win a WS, it would more likely be with the Yankees & not Frisco. The D.Rays will get 3rd place in the AL East b4 Frisco will ever win a WS. Only way the Giants will win one is if they moved back 2 NY. Make him a DH, you don't have 2 worry about him missing an easy fly ball once in a blue moon.
User avatar
Slamm Goodbody
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,364
And1: 101
Joined: Feb 22, 2006
Location: NY

 

Post#2 » by Slamm Goodbody » Tue Feb 26, 2008 12:40 pm

No reason to bring Bonds here. We're trying to get younger and clear out the dead weight, not bring on old players with more baggage. The NY media would tear him apart anyway.
Mardy Collins Superfan
User avatar
VinnyTheMick
RealGM
Posts: 13,843
And1: 5
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Getting wasted with Ron Swanson.
Contact:

 

Post#3 » by VinnyTheMick » Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:28 pm

If he wasn't a locker room cancer & if we hadn't gotten so beat down in the Mitchell Report & if we didn't already have a glut at DH. Bonds would have a monster year with the short right porch in YS.
http://www.nyccan.org/
Ask questions. Demand answers.
A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth.- Albert Einstein
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#4 » by 34Celtic » Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:54 pm

Horrible...just horrible.

I would want him if there weren't so much baggage, and he didn't have a federal indictmint looming...who knows if he'll get to play an entire season....
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
Yankee
Junior
Posts: 419
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 21, 2006

 

Post#5 » by Yankee » Tue Feb 26, 2008 6:03 pm

Why not...roidger clemens is no diferent
“Let me ask you this: The Secretary General of the U.N. was sitting near me. Do we fire him because we don’t have world peace? I mean, come on.” -Rev. Al Sharpton on Isiah
HCYanks
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,427
And1: 2
Joined: May 24, 2002

 

Post#6 » by HCYanks » Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:15 pm

On a short-term contract, sure. Probably makes us the clear favorite to win the division. It won't happen given the team's stance on him and the roster situation. At bare minimum, they'd have to deal Matsui to open up a spot for him. Part of the reason the Rays report caught some media fire is that Tampa is arguably the best match for him in the league right now.
a-rod
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,778
And1: 21
Joined: Aug 12, 2006
Location: Rest In Peace Dad
Contact:
       

 

Post#7 » by a-rod » Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:51 pm

oh god no hes not worth the risk, hes ego-maniac, self-centered ,whiner, and immature (plus we have two guys of that nature already).

lets to build a team with good chemistry.
pillwenney wrote:
SacKingZZZ wrote:No thanks to Deng. I read a rumor surfing hoopshype awhile back saying Gay for Reke is a possibility.


Must be true, if it's a rumor you read on Hoopshype.
:rofl:
34Celtic
Analyst
Posts: 3,406
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2007

 

Post#8 » by 34Celtic » Tue Feb 26, 2008 8:45 pm

Yankee wrote:Why not...roidger clemens is no diferent


Roger Clemens didn't have the federal indictment looming over him last season, he also wasn't a raging prick to anyone and everyone in his way...only Mike Piazza.
HCYanks wrote:Thanks for reminding me Clay Buchholz is a couple of blocks away from me, Fox. Now I have to go hide my laptop.
Curmudgeon
RealGM
Posts: 41,472
And1: 25,000
Joined: Jan 20, 2004
Location: Boston, MA

 

Post#9 » by Curmudgeon » Wed Feb 27, 2008 12:48 pm

Sure, give him a 5 year deal for 18 million a year. That's what George would have done.
"Numbers lie alot. Wins and losses don't lie." - Jerry West
"You are what your record says you are."- Bill Parcells
"Offense sells tickets. Defense wins games. Rebounding wins championships." Pat Summit
User avatar
Da big3
Starter
Posts: 2,405
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 29, 2007
Location: #hellobrooklyn

Steinbrenner speaks, what else 

Post#10 » by Da big3 » Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:02 pm

SARGO127
General Manager
Posts: 7,902
And1: 3,175
Joined: Jan 11, 2004
Location: CT
       

 

Post#11 » by SARGO127 » Sat Mar 1, 2008 10:41 pm

He can still rake, period. I don't care about the off the field issues. The guy will help us win a championship.
User avatar
PR07
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,180
And1: 2
Joined: Jul 25, 2003
Location: PacersRule07

 

Post#12 » by PR07 » Sun Mar 2, 2008 8:35 am

Absolutely not. He has a ton of baggage and is a clubhouse cancer. He can't field anymore, and we already have a former juicer locked in as our DH in Jason Giambi. The Yankees need to try to distance themselves as much as possible from the steroids era after recent events, signing Bonds would do just the opposite.
sully00
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 28,105
And1: 7,738
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Location: Providence, RI
       

 

Post#13 » by sully00 » Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:02 pm

Unless he can handle the 7th or 8th inning who cares. Does anyone really think he is that much better than Giambi in the end, both are huge health risks, at least Giambi is only 36 not going on 43. We don't need both that is for sure.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,229
And1: 25,675
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#14 » by moocow007 » Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:05 am

The Yankees have enough offense, not to mention DH's...what they could have used is a good shot of speed and defensive aptitude in the OF. Barry Bonds is just NOT a need at all, whatsoever. And Bonds is a 24-and-1 player if there ever was one. He has his own ROW of lockers (yes, a whole ROW) and a private (yep, only he can watch it) giant HD TV in the lockerroom when he was with the Giants. The Yankees need to go back to the formula that worked for them when they were actually winning championships. Bonds would bring another circus of distractions here that this team just does not need regardless of how many juiced up balls he can hit out of Yankee stadium.
User avatar
Dirty Water
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,785
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 29, 2005
Location: The future

 

Post#15 » by Dirty Water » Mon Mar 31, 2008 7:00 am

User avatar
Da big3
Starter
Posts: 2,405
And1: 2
Joined: Nov 29, 2007
Location: #hellobrooklyn

 

Post#16 » by Da big3 » Tue Apr 1, 2008 9:46 pm

no, like we really short on offense, not needed.......

Return to New York Yankees