Jones boys
Moderator: HMFFL
Jones boys
- utjazzfan4life
- Banned User
- Posts: 690
- And1: 33
- Joined: Jun 25, 2006
Jones boys
I know, I know, its still very early in the season.
However, through 5 games they are a combined 7-37 to start the year (.189 AVG), with no HR, and only 1 RBI.
Cause for concern?
However, through 5 games they are a combined 7-37 to start the year (.189 AVG), with no HR, and only 1 RBI.
Cause for concern?
- utjazzfan4life
- Banned User
- Posts: 690
- And1: 33
- Joined: Jun 25, 2006
HMFFL wrote:No reason to even allow this to bother you. They are two of the best at what they do and they will come around.
Oh no doubt, I know they will too. I just always want them to do well and to see them struggling out the gate is tough. But hey, we're 4-1, so i guess its a good sign that even though they arent driving in runs we are winning.
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,836
- And1: 622
- Joined: Nov 08, 2004
- Location: ATL. ^^ 22 on the shot clock.
-
- Mardy2Curry
- Junior
- Posts: 344
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 13, 2007
The averages will continue to go up as will the run production. The key IMO to our lineup is Franceour. McCann is giving AJ good protection in the 5 hole but Franceour needs to give some protection to Mac. Judging from the current homestand Wilson will not give up much contribution against lefties, I'd much rather see Thorman in there against lefties than that guy. As far as Langs and Diaz splitting time I like it.
- HMFFL
- Global Mod
- Posts: 53,769
- And1: 10,229
- Joined: Mar 10, 2004
AKsWill wrote:Well Chip's RBI production would be much better if we had a decent lead-off guy.. As much as I hate to say it, I kinda miss Giles.
I hate to admit it also but I'm also missing Marcus. He's having a good season so far and we could really use some lead off help. I hope we fix this problem before we get to deep into the season.
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,513
- And1: 2,087
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
-
The production you're really missing is Furcal. You guys don't have that prototypical leadoff speed guy to set the table and create havoc. Johnson isn't going to cut it. Woodward won't cut it either (he didn't with us, anyway). He's just a decent utility type who can spell Larry/Renteria every so often. In fact, if Renteria doesn't produce like last year and reverts back to Boston days, the Jones' won't have much to drive in.
- Mardy2Curry
- Junior
- Posts: 344
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 13, 2007
As much as I agree that Johnson isn't your prototypical leadoff hitter he is still getting on base via walks which is second to chipper. So lets not start killing kelly cuz he's not exactly ripping the league. JS knew that we needed a leadoff hitter or a power hitting LF and got neither, instead he chose Wilson and bullpen help which I don't disagree since our bullpen was a horrible last season. Hopefully come trade deadline he will go out and make a move for a leadoff hitter that can steal bases. 12 games into the season and we have 3 SB's as a team will not cut it. Buts let not forget that before Furcal arrived we really didn't have a SB threat at the top of the lineup.

-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,513
- And1: 2,087
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
-
Mardy2Curry wrote:As much as I agree that Johnson isn't your prototypical leadoff hitter he is still getting on base via walks which is second to chipper. So lets not start killing kelly cuz he's not exactly ripping the league. JS knew that we needed a leadoff hitter or a power hitting LF and got neither, instead he chose Wilson and bullpen help which I don't disagree since our bullpen was a horrible last season. Hopefully come trade deadline he will go out and make a move for a leadoff hitter that can steal bases. 12 games into the season and we have 3 SB's as a team will not cut it. Buts let not forget that before Furcal arrived we really didn't have a SB threat at the top of the lineup.
At the very least, you guys should have kept Giles for lack of a better option. That lineup is going to be hard-pressed to manufacture runs. As it stands, you're going to have to rely on the long ball - which can be feast or famine.
I see you're a Knicks fan


- Mardy2Curry
- Junior
- Posts: 344
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 13, 2007
ToHoleWithSoul wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
At the very least, you guys should have kept Giles for lack of a better option. That lineup is going to be hard-pressed to manufacture runs. As it stands, you're going to have to rely on the long ball - which can be feast or famine.
I see you're a Knicks fan. How does that work? Oh well, at least you got it half right
I kinda wished we would have kept Pena, Jr instead of Johnson better bat and glove. Giles should have been kept around but I wonder if the saving of money is for resigning Andruw, sure hope so as all of us do.
Braves where the first team I saw when a child and figured might as well root for them. Been a Braves fan for 16 yrs now.