Baltimore @ Seattle
Baltimore @ Seattle
- BlackMamba
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 16,297
- And1: 81
- Joined: Jun 20, 2004
- Location: Cd. de M
-
Baltimore @ Seattle
3 game home series.
the pitching matchup gives the mariners the edge, first two games we have f
the pitching matchup gives the mariners the edge, first two games we have f
- b_roy7
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,908
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 11, 2007
- Contact:
Re: Baltimore @ Seattle
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,215
- And1: 36
- Joined: Aug 12, 2001
-
Re: Baltimore @ Seattle
BlackMamba wrote:3 game home series.
the pitching matchup gives the mariners the edge, first two games we have f
- Bay_Areas_Finest
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,505
- And1: 1
- Joined: Apr 10, 2006
- Location: Bay Area, California
- b_roy7
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,908
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 11, 2007
- Contact:
- BlackMamba
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 16,297
- And1: 81
- Joined: Jun 20, 2004
- Location: Cd. de M
-
yeah, i've been worried about the felix situation. he has pitched some amazing games, still the offense can do anything so he goes out without decision.
and good to have putz back, i think this stabilizes the bullpen.
and yes, i just saw dickey i no longer the starter for game 3, it's washburn.
and about bedard, if he's back i think it would be vs. the A's or even vs. the indians.
and good to have putz back, i think this stabilizes the bullpen.
and yes, i just saw dickey i no longer the starter for game 3, it's washburn.
and about bedard, if he's back i think it would be vs. the A's or even vs. the indians.
Re: Baltimore @ Seattle
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 112
- And1: 0
- Joined: Apr 11, 2007
- Location: Pullman/Federal Way, WA
- Contact:
Re: Baltimore @ Seattle
Sweezo wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Actually, Dickey was just optioned to Tacoma. Which I'm thinking means he's gone since last time he went through waivers any team could have claimed him. I think he has some value to an MLB team...
Didn't we give Minnesota some scrub minor league catcher so we didn't have to deal with that anymore? I'm pretty sure we did.
- Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
Yeah; the Mariners gave up Jair Fernandez to obtain Dickey's option.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,213
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jun 17, 2003
I don't think Sweezo was referring to the requirement that he be offered back to Minnesota or Milwaukee or whoever it was. That was taken care of by the trade. It was about a possible waiver wire claim. I'm not sure I understand, though, since Dickey's contract is a minor league contract -- not that I really know, but I'd think a player under a minor league contract can actually be sent to the minors like the agreement says. Or maybe not; maybe when the team "purchased the contract" of Dickey rather than "recalling" him the way they do with prospects, it subjected him to the normal procedures. I don't know. Anybody got a baseball equivalent of the Larry Coon FAQ here?
- Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
Looking at his career, I think Dickey may have had some of his original options left.
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,215
- And1: 36
- Joined: Aug 12, 2001
-
I'd been bagging on the Rhodes idea quite a bit, but...who expected him to be throwing as hard as he is right now? I'm still 100% against having him overtake RRS but I guess I'll take a hard throwing Rhodes over an inconsistent EOF for the time being.
It's great having JJ back. I was concerned, but he looked as good as ever last night.
Yep.
This Dickey thing really doesn't make sense to me now, as it seemed pretty clear that once we traded away the scrub catcher to the Twins, we still had to pass Dickey through waivers to get him to AAA. Why would we have to go through the latter process if he still had options remaining?
It's great having JJ back. I was concerned, but he looked as good as ever last night.
Ex-hippie wrote:I don't think Sweezo was referring to the requirement that he be offered back to Minnesota or Milwaukee or whoever it was. That was taken care of by the trade. It was about a possible waiver wire claim. I'm not sure I understand, though, since Dickey's contract is a minor league contract -- not that I really know, but I'd think a player under a minor league contract can actually be sent to the minors like the agreement says. Or maybe not; maybe when the team "purchased the contract" of Dickey rather than "recalling" him the way they do with prospects, it subjected him to the normal procedures. I don't know. Anybody got a baseball equivalent of the Larry Coon FAQ here?
Yep.
This Dickey thing really doesn't make sense to me now, as it seemed pretty clear that once we traded away the scrub catcher to the Twins, we still had to pass Dickey through waivers to get him to AAA. Why would we have to go through the latter process if he still had options remaining?
- Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
Silva pitched a pretty decent game but, man, were the M
Manocad wrote:The universe is the age it is. We can all agree it's 13 billion years old, and nothing changes. We can all agree it's 6000 years old, and nothing changes. We can all disagree on how old it is, and nothing changes. Some people really need a hobby.
- Bay_Areas_Finest
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,505
- And1: 1
- Joined: Apr 10, 2006
- Location: Bay Area, California
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,215
- And1: 36
- Joined: Aug 12, 2001
-
I'm comfortable with the pitching. For the most part, the starters have kept the M's in ballgames. I can't fault Silva, a contact pitcher, for giving up two runs in seven innings. Or even RRS for giving up a solo shot. If your staff gives up three runs, they've done their job.
And if a starter goes down, other teams have worse contingency plans than Baek or Dickey. Meanwhile, Morrow's looking alot better as well.
Offensively, though...holy crap. It's a problem when you think adding Barry Bonds would bring some youth to the lineup...
Meanwhile, Oakland signs Frank Thomas for about $350k. What a crock of ****.
And if a starter goes down, other teams have worse contingency plans than Baek or Dickey. Meanwhile, Morrow's looking alot better as well.
Offensively, though...holy crap. It's a problem when you think adding Barry Bonds would bring some youth to the lineup...
Meanwhile, Oakland signs Frank Thomas for about $350k. What a crock of ****.
- Basketball Jesus
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 31,180
- And1: 7
- Joined: Sep 04, 2003
- Location: P-nuts + hair doos
- b_roy7
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,908
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 11, 2007
- Contact: