Post game thread: Milwaukee Bucks VS Wizards
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
-
xTitan
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,135
- And1: 2,283
- Joined: Mar 03, 2006
-
Epicurus wrote:I realize that with Redd and Mason out that Simmons would have extra time, but isn't over 40 minutes a bit much, given his recovery?
How with Redd out does Bogut not bring more to the game? Sooner or later he needs to step up and demand more action--spread down low, get the knees bent, the hands up, and call for the ball, holding his man on his rearend. Then get the ball and move immediately. So what if it doesn't work, what alternative for success is negated?
I agree with this, they did it for a stretch in the second and Bogut had decent success....in the 3rd Jordan went to a zone, basically collapsed on him and dared the Bucks to shoot from the outside...at which point the bucks quit trying to go inside and bogut quit trying.....a bigger question is how can the Roger Masons, Daniels, and Stevensons of the world play hard and make shots when much more highly paid players on the Bucks can't.
-
msiris
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,040
- And1: 2,290
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
- Location: Central Wisconsin
Would not make a difference. CV is a crappy defensive player.paul wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
This point is being overlooked a lot. I like Yi's potential as well but apart from that 29 point game he's given very little. We need to start CV, now.
Need to blow up this team from the GM and down. Even LK.
Ride the tank
- rilamann
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,067
- And1: 15,594
- Joined: Jun 20, 2003
- Location: The Land of Giannis.
-
Simulack wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Please find a quote where I said anything remotely comparable to "Bogut was the problem tonight."
I made comments about Bogut in the game thread specifically in reference to someone claiming Bogut was a "bright spot" tonight. Even a cursory understanding of elementary logic should make it obvious that saying "Bogut was not a bright spot" is not the same thing as claiming "Bogut was the problem tonight." Or maybe you have to bring the 2nd one up because it would be a losing battle to try to argue against the 1st?
The key word is effort and Bogut was realy the only guy on the Bucks tonight who gave a solid effort.I wouldnt say Bogut had a great game by any means tonight but the effort was there thats been my point on why Bogut was the only bright spot tonight.
Your trying to make out like im saying Bogut had an outstanding game tonight which is not what im saying at all.
We all realize you don't like Bogut and are almost as biased agianst him as Classicjack and im not going to argue with you about this all night.
The guy gave a good effort just leave at that.
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks

- Posts: 62,817
- And1: 30,081
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
-
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks

- Posts: 62,817
- And1: 30,081
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
-
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 112,320
- And1: 27,981
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
I feel like the fans need to go Lou Brown from Major League on the team.
"You guys keep making excuses. THAT'S ALL YOU DO GOOD!"
"You guys keep making excuses. THAT'S ALL YOU DO GOOD!"
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.












