Kings @ Bulls Postgame Thread: Its a hard-knock life..

Shill · Post #41 » by **Shill** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:31 am

sk33 wrote:don't care if we got a W or L in the standings. Tyrus got 23 minutes, so this game's a win for the Chicago Bulls organization.

fudgie · Post #42 » by **fudgie** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:32 am

If anybody is wondering why this game was so close, it's because Wallace and Duhon combined for 1 point in 58 minutes. This is just brutal.

Can we please trade Du and Noc for a big guard. I'd really love to do Wallace for a guard but that's probably too much to ask for.

newskoolbulls · Post #43 » by **newskoolbulls** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:33 am

coldfish Jaque Vaughn with the Hawks a few yrs ago missed like 47 shots to start the season i believe. Cdoo shots all look good but I think he shoots them to hard. You think playing with a gunner like BG in practice he and Kirk could pick up some pointer from the guy.

Post #44 » by **kulaz3000** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:33 am

Boylan wants to use Thabo more, but more for his defense. Thabo needs to slow down on the offensive side.

whonka · Post #45 » by **whonka** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:34 am

_snake_ wrote:If anybody is wondering why this game was so close, it's because Wallace and Duhon combined for 1 point in 58 minutes. This is just brutal.

Can we please trade Du and Noc for a big guard. I'd really love to do Wallace for a guard but that's probably too much to ask for.

wasn't that 1 point the most important point of the game?

yeah?

kobebull · Post #46 » by **kobebull** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:34 am

You guys should be happy regardless. We had no Deng, who's one of our top two options. Take him out, and all the while having BW in, it's like playing 3 on 5 instead of 4 on 5 like usual. Kudos to the guys who stepped up and did their share (Tyrus and Thabo).

BigUps · Post #47 » by **BigUps** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:34 am

JamesOn in, Duhon out? :dontknow:

I'm kind of intrigued by what JamesOn could do.

newskoolbulls · Post #48 » by **newskoolbulls** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:35 am

Du and Noc for Magette and a lottery protected pick?

Post #49 » by **kulaz3000** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:35 am

BigUps wrote:JamesOn in, Duhon out?

I'm kind of intrigued by what JamesOn could do.

Im also curious to see what JamesOn can do aswell. He could very well be our Douby..

whonka · Post #50 » by **whonka** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:36 am

BigUps wrote:JamesOn in, Duhon out?

I'm kind of intrigued by what JamesOn could do.

i wish i could put the on in front of the james and then add a lebr

Post #51 » by **coldfish** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:36 am

At this point, I would start Griffin at the 2. You simply cannot start a guy playing this poorly. The starters are not playing that bad and if Duhon could convert the opportunities being handed to him, the team would look pretty good.

newskoolbulls · Post #52 » by **newskoolbulls** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:36 am

JamesOn and Nichols baby. We need some scoring. Nichols stats in the NBDL through 4 games are quite interesting.

chicagobull · Post #53 » by **chicagobull** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:37 am

newskoolbulls wrote:You think playing with a gunner like BG in practice he and Kirk could pick up some pointer from the guy.

You just can't teach awesome, you either have it or you don't.

Seriously though Duhon really is having problems now, I think it's time to bench him again, put Gordon in the starting.

fudgie · Post #54 » by **fudgie** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:37 am

newskoolbulls wrote:Du and Noc for Magette and a lottery protected pick?

Oh dear God YES! I'd even do it without the pick.

newskoolbulls · Post #55 » by **newskoolbulls** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:38 am

lol you cant teach awesome, funny stuff.

whonka · Post #56 » by **whonka** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:38 am

chicagobull wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

You just can't teach awesome, you either have it or you don't.

Seriously though Duhon really is having problems now, I think it's time to bench him again, put Gordon in the starting.

good point. usually it's around this time that gordon gets re-inserted. (or is it a month or two later)?

JackFinn · Post #57 » by **JackFinn** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:38 am

Throwing down a shot of patron, toasting my fellow fans who had a good time tonight. Cheers.

*oh christ*

Gregnice33 · Post #58 » by **Gregnice33** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:39 am

BuLLs>LiFe wrote:I don't really care if Duhon fouled him. BW definitely didn't foul him, people saying otherwise need to look at it again. Miller got a foul call when he clearly just lost the ball on a previous possession and tied the game. Works out for me.

Very true, so we can call it even. Add that to the fact that even if Duhon wasn't in the gym there was a 1% shot Miller makes a jump shot with Wallace on top on him, after he was catching a rejected shot with less than second.

It was a good no call, even though it was a foul.

fudgie · Post #59 » by **fudgie** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:39 am

whonka wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

wasn't that 1 point the most important point of the game?

yeah?

Yeah, but it wouldn't have even been close if either of them could score at a reasonable rate.

newskoolbulls · Post #60 » by **newskoolbulls** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 4:39 am

Rember Vaughn was drafted to be Stocktons replacement lol.