What could have been but thank god it wasn't

Bmoney · Post #1 » by **Bmoney** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:17 am

All I have to say is THANK GOD KP traded ZACK cause if he was on this team they'd never win 15 of 16.

Good riddance!

:clap:

Frye is better than Zack baby & we got J.Jones too, what a genius move!

Pattycakes · Post #2 » by **Pattycakes** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 10:36 am

Qft..?

Yadadimean · Post #3 » by **Yadadimean** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 1:17 pm

QFT!!!!!!!!!! curse words curse word!!!!!!!! WE GIOT GREG ODEN!!!!! drunk post#2

Goldbum · Post #4 » by **Goldbum** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:15 pm

Frye is not better than Zach. Zach has never been used properly in NY.

Walton'sBeard! · Post #5 » by **Walton'sBeard!** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:24 pm

To me, it depends on your definition of "better". If we are talking about stats, then yes Zach is much better. But if we are talking about value to a team then Frye is better. Zach has a negative impact on any team he'd ever play for while Frye has a small positive impact. By my definition of better, Frye is better. But this argument is so 7 months ago.

Milkdud · Post #6 » by **Milkdud** » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:33 pm

Frye's impact on our team is better since he allows LA to be one of the blazers offensive focal points. That was not gonna happen as long as Z-Bo was around. But if you were just matching the 2 up in terms to talent Zach is clearly a better players both offensively and rebounding aspect... Frye might be better on D if at all its marginal.