CLE - NY - SAC

Post #1 » by **Spykes** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 10:48 pm

Cleveland Trades

Larry Hughes
Drew Gooden
Eric Snow

Cleveland Receives

Mike Bibby
Zach Randolph

NY Trades

Zach Randolph

NY Receives

Larry Hughes

Sacramento Trades

Mike Bibby

Sacramento Receives

Drew Gooden
Eric Snow

Crimson King · Post #2 » by **Crimson King** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 10:56 pm

Don't understand why this is a 3 way. There are 2 trades:

1) NY-CLE: Hughes for Randolph

2) SAC-CLE: Snow, Gooden for Bibby

About B), Sacramento shouldn't do that, it's much better keep Bibby than take those two IMO.

Rasheed36 · Post #3 » by **Rasheed36** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 10:57 pm

Sorry son but this has been discussed hundreds of times already and it's been officially declared that Cavs don't have the parts for Bibby or Artest.

Rasheed36 · Post #4 » by **Rasheed36** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 11:00 pm

Also I would like to add that this is way to good to even be true for Cleveland. And why does the Knicks need anymore over payed guards? Especially one that is injury prone.

LeQuitterNotMVP · Post #5 » by **LeQuitterNotMVP** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 11:30 pm

Cavs accept both deals, but only if they're both done. They wouldn't make sense if they were independent of each other. Also, would the Kings do it if we took KT in exchange for Marshall?

Bac2Basics · Post #6 » by **Bac2Basics** » Mon Jan 7, 2008 11:42 pm

Kings say no, and quickly.