NYK: Could they be possible trade partners?

JD225 · Post #81 » by **JD225** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 9:40 pm

Crawford and Calderon? In our back court? Playing defense?

N1QUE24 · Post #82 » by **N1QUE24** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 9:56 pm

Against bench players.. it's not that hard to defend 3rd tier players.

basketball royalty · Post #83 » by **basketball royalty** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 10:08 pm

I like Crawford but would definitely say no to Curry.

Post #84 » by **Harry Palmer** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 10:10 pm

Where did all these closet Crawford fans come from?

Wacky.

basketball royalty · Post #85 » by **basketball royalty** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 10:13 pm

Harry Palmer wrote:Where did all these closet Crawford fans come from?

Wacky.

I have always liked him. I realize he is streaky, but he is a crunchtime performer and would be a great combo guard. I also think he, amidst the chaos that is the Knicks, has actually improved as a player. Mostly due to Larry Browns tenure there.

Post #86 » by **YogiStewart** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 10:55 pm

am i too late to make fun of this post?

richardhutnik · Post #87 » by **richardhutnik** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 11:03 pm

RockTHECasbah wrote:Curry isn't a REALLY bad contract

He needs to be masked with someone who plays great defense

He can also opt out after the end of next season.

- Rich

richardhutnik · Post #88 » by **richardhutnik** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 11:05 pm

Are people here saying they would rather have Rasho over Curry? Did I see that correctly?

- Rich

Mak · Post #89 » by **Mak** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 11:10 pm

richardhutnik wrote:Are people here saying they would rather have Rasho over Curry? Did I see that correctly?

- Rich

I would rather have have a bag of basketballs over Curry.

- Mak

The_Hater · Post #90 » by **The_Hater** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 11:15 pm

richardhutnik wrote:Are people here saying they would rather have Rasho over Curry? Did I see that correctly?

- Rich

Curry with only 1 skill, several negative skills, a huge contract and a 'don't care' attitude has negative trade value.

Rasho's not great by any stretch but trading him for Curry who then ties up a lot of cap space for several years would be a backwards move.

It's an unfortunate reality that most Knick fans haven't come to realize yet. Marbs, Crawford, Curry and Randolph all have between marginal and negative trade value due to their contracts.

richardhutnik wrote:
He can also opt out after the end of next season.

- Rich

Which he won't do --> unless taking a huge paycut is his ultimate goal.

Post #91 » by **Harry Palmer** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 11:15 pm

The Hater, get with the program.

-Schadenfreude

Edit-crap, I meant to say Guy Smiley.

Paperclip · Post #92 » by **Paperclip** » Wed Jan 9, 2008 11:24 pm

Not sure why there is 8 pages but I assume there might be some debate of some knicks players being useful here. For the record:

-crawford sucks
-curry sucks

I dont see where they would fit in at all. I wouldn`t take them for free unless I knew for a fact I could trade them for something somewhat useful without eating a contract.

Post #93 » by **YogiStewart** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:20 am

aznAce wrote:Not sure why there is 8 pages but I assume there might be some debate of some knicks players being useful here. For the record:

-crawford sucks
-curry sucks

I dont see where they would fit in at all. I wouldn`t take them for free unless I knew for a fact I could trade them for something somewhat useful without eating a contract.

hahaaa you said "Curry" and "eating" in the same post.

how sweet the iron knee!